The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Oct 14, 2022 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Why did Vincent van Gogh paint this skeleton smoking a cigarette in 1886?
The answer is simple: we don't know.

In the absence of any explanation from the painter himself, we simply have to speculate about what prompted van Gogh to paint this rather gloomy, if not morbidly funny, portrait...
It was painted when van Gogh was thirty three and studying (briefly) at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp.

In such academies they used skulls as models for drawing; students would learn both about human anatomy and how to render depth and surface.
Van Gogh also painted these skulls in 1888, which with the smoking skull are three of only four times he ever painted a skeleton.

Was he simply practicing anatomical modelling with his own personal flair? Or was he making fun of the whole, old-fashioned, stuffy process?
We know that van Gogh ran into trouble at the Antwerp Academy.

They, just like the influential Parisian School of Fine Arts, taught painting as it had been in the Renaissance: drawing first, colour later.

This Academic style was about perspective, depth, and "realism". Sappho and Alcaeus by Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema, a fellow gra
But we know that van Gogh was less interested in studio realism and more in the feeling of a moment or place, wrapped up in a kaleidoscope of vivid colours.

Less depth and shape, a flatter perspective, unnatural colours, though perhaps realistic in a *different* way. The Church at Auvers by Vincent van Gogh (1890)The Church of San Giorgio Maggiore by Canaletto (1740s)
So, at the very least, we might say that Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette is a mission statement about van Gogh's identity as an artist.

That he rejected the "drawing" and "realism" of the Academy in favour of colour and feeling. The Red Vineyard by Vincent van Gogh (1888)Cincinnatus Receives the Ambassadors from Rome by Alexandre
And we might also suppose that the smoking skeleton is a "vanitas" or "memento mori".

This is a genre of painting, popular down the centuries, which can take many forms. The idea is to remind us of the transience of life and the inevitablity and ubiquity of death...
There was a long tradition of painting still lifes with a memento mori.

As in this 1642 work, where we see the finely detailed fabric, careful lighting, and exquisitely realised surfaces of metal and glass and flowers that we associate with the still life.

Along with a skull... Vanitas Still-Life with a Bouquet and a Skull by Adriaen van
Or in this rather more strikingly composed still life from the same time, by Harmen Steenwijck.

Life, whatever its pleasures, must end. Vanitas by Harmen Steenwijck (1640s)
The unexplained presence of a skull is certainly startling, especially when considering what still lifes are usually like.

They are a moment frozen in time, one of seeming decadence, with a focus on luxurious foods and materials: really the *opposite* of a memento mori. Still Life by Pieter Claesz (1623)
But the memento mori goes beyond still life, as in this wonderful self-portrait by the great proto-Romantic artist Salvator Rosa, painted in 1647.

The book on the table is by Seneca, and on the skull Rosa is writing "Behold, whither, eventually" in Greek.
One of the most famous memento moris in art is the distorted skull in the foreground of The Ambassadors, painted by Hans Holbein the Younger in 1553.

On the right you can see it from a different angle, revealing the full skull. This is another of art's great mysteries.
And so, returning to van Gogh, we may draw a connection with the memento mori and his smoking skull.

Just before its creation van Gogh had been living with and painting the peasants in Nuenen, whom he depicted rather gloomily, plus becoming sick and poor himself... Farm with Stacks of Peat (1883)
And so, perhaps inspired by the poverty and ill-health in which he been living, van Gogh took the standard practice of modelling human skulls as a chance to say something deeper and profounder.

It certainly says more to us than a typical student's skeleton study: Attributed to John Linnell (1792-1882) a British portrait an
Is it an anti-smoking message? Apparently not. Van Gogh was a heavy pipe-smoker throughout his life and basically lived on tobacco.

And, as he once wrote, "the most beautiful paintings are those one dreams of while smoking a pipe in one's bed."
So that's the memento mori.

But returning to the original question - why did Vincent van Gogh paint the smoking skeleton? - brings us to something fascinating and interminable about art.
Consider: why did Vincent van Gogh paint these sunflowers?

Did he find them beautiful? Did he find their brightness charming? Did he simply wish to experiment with vivid shades of yellow? Was he angry, sad, happy?
We may ask this question about any given painting, and in the absence of an anecdote or explanation from the artist, we must simply speculate about why they painted it.

Though, in the end, it might not even matter. What's important, perhaps, is what a painting means to us.
We shall never be sure why Vincent van Gogh painted the Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette.

Perhaps it was satire, perhaps an artistic statement, perhaps a momenti mori, perhaps a joke, perhaps a playful experiment, maybe none of these... maybe even he didn't know!
We have all probably spent far more time wondering about this question than van Gogh ever did.

Which leaves us with the most important question of all, then: what does it mean to you?
If you enjoyed reading about Van Gogh's smoking skull then you may wish to join the 40k+ readers of my free weekly newsletter, Areopagus.

It features seven short lessons every Friday, including art, architecture, and rhetoric.

Consider subscribing here:
culturaltutor.com/areopagus

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Sep 26
A brief introduction to John Singer Sargent, one of the greatest portrait painters in history: Image
John Singer Sargent was born to American parents in Florence, Italy, in 1856.

He spent his early life wandering Europe, studying art in Paris along the way and quickly establishing himself as a painter.

El Jaleo, painted in 1882, was inspired by Sargent's time in Spain: Image
It was in his early days as a student, in 1879, that Sargent made one of his first great portraits — of his teacher, a man called Carolus-Duran.

It was exhibited at the Paris Salon, an annual exhibition and the most prestigious event in the world of art.

People loved it. Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 23
The best of Autumn in art:

1. Three Worlds by MC Escher (1955) Image
2. November by John Atkinson Grimshaw (1879)

A painting that makes you feel cold just looking at it.

Grimshaw was a specialist at nocturnal scenes and here he captures perfectly the damp chill of an autumnal night, infusing it with a darkly dreamlike, Gothic atmosphere. Image
3. Mount Fuji in the Autumn by Kanō Tsunenobu (1690)

A different approach to Grimshaw — rather than depicting the scene in its totality, Tsunenobu essentialises the landscape and focusses on a handful of details, barely even outlines.

The perfect evocation of autumn mist. Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 18
This is Hallgrímskirkja in Reykjavík, Iceland.

And it's the perfect example of an unusual architectural style called Expressionism... Image
This is about architecture — but the story begins with art.

The Scream by Edvard Munch (of which he made several versions) is probably the most famous example of Expressionism in art.

Expressionism was about painting how the world *felt* rather than how it *looked*. Image
Hence Expressionist art — which first appeared in the 1890s and really came to life in the 1920s — was defined by unnaturally vivid colours and unrealistic shapes.

Everything is dramatic, restless, and colourful.

Art as pure emotion rather than outward appearance. Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 12
Portugal has some of the most delightful architecture in the world.

Why? Because it's normal for buildings to be covered in hundreds of colourful, patterned tiles.

They are called "azulejos" — and they show just how easy it is to make cities more interesting... Image
The etymology of the word "azulejo" tells you where it originated.

It comes from the Arabic word "al-zillij", or "zellij", a form of colourful, decorative tilework that emerged in North Africa in the 10th century.

Here's an example from the Al-Attarine Madrasa in Fes, Morocco: Image
Figurative art — depicting humans or animals — is essentially forbidden in mosques, and so Islamic artisans had to master other forms of decoration.

Hence the prevalence of geometric or floral design in Islamic art and architecture, all over the world, from India to Spain: Image
Read 24 tweets
Sep 10
Why do some cities just feel more interesting?

It's not only because of architecture — it's also details like benches, bus stops, signs, and lighting.

So here's a brief introduction to "street furniture", one of the most underrated parts of urban design... Image
Architecture and urban design aren't only about buildings.

They're also about "street furniture" — all the details that every city needs to function.

Benches, bins, bus stops, bollards, lights, signs, post boxes, fences, bicycle racks, fountains, manholes, and so on. Image
The amount of street furniture in the world has increased massively in the last century or so.

See, one of the most striking things about old photographs is how empty the streets feel.

There's just less *stuff* scattered around: Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 6
358 years ago today the Great Fire of London finally came to an end.

The city had been destroyed — and it was rebuilt in a very strange way.

This is the story of what makes London's urban design so unique... Image
London is strange.

It has a confusing Medieval layout with winding streets and narrow lanes... but with very little Medieval architecture.

Just compare it to other cities like York or Durham, full of Gothic towers and timber-framed houses. Image
Well, in the 17th century London was a bustling Medieval city with a population of nearly 400,000.

Contemporary maps and engravings show what it was like.

Wooden buildings crowded together, thatched roofs, narrow streets, winding lanes, and endless Gothic spires. Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(