The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Oct 14, 2022 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Why did Vincent van Gogh paint this skeleton smoking a cigarette in 1886?
The answer is simple: we don't know.

In the absence of any explanation from the painter himself, we simply have to speculate about what prompted van Gogh to paint this rather gloomy, if not morbidly funny, portrait...
It was painted when van Gogh was thirty three and studying (briefly) at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp.

In such academies they used skulls as models for drawing; students would learn both about human anatomy and how to render depth and surface.
Van Gogh also painted these skulls in 1888, which with the smoking skull are three of only four times he ever painted a skeleton.

Was he simply practicing anatomical modelling with his own personal flair? Or was he making fun of the whole, old-fashioned, stuffy process?
We know that van Gogh ran into trouble at the Antwerp Academy.

They, just like the influential Parisian School of Fine Arts, taught painting as it had been in the Renaissance: drawing first, colour later.

This Academic style was about perspective, depth, and "realism". Sappho and Alcaeus by Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema, a fellow gra
But we know that van Gogh was less interested in studio realism and more in the feeling of a moment or place, wrapped up in a kaleidoscope of vivid colours.

Less depth and shape, a flatter perspective, unnatural colours, though perhaps realistic in a *different* way. The Church at Auvers by Vincent van Gogh (1890)The Church of San Giorgio Maggiore by Canaletto (1740s)
So, at the very least, we might say that Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette is a mission statement about van Gogh's identity as an artist.

That he rejected the "drawing" and "realism" of the Academy in favour of colour and feeling. The Red Vineyard by Vincent van Gogh (1888)Cincinnatus Receives the Ambassadors from Rome by Alexandre
And we might also suppose that the smoking skeleton is a "vanitas" or "memento mori".

This is a genre of painting, popular down the centuries, which can take many forms. The idea is to remind us of the transience of life and the inevitablity and ubiquity of death...
There was a long tradition of painting still lifes with a memento mori.

As in this 1642 work, where we see the finely detailed fabric, careful lighting, and exquisitely realised surfaces of metal and glass and flowers that we associate with the still life.

Along with a skull... Vanitas Still-Life with a Bouquet and a Skull by Adriaen van
Or in this rather more strikingly composed still life from the same time, by Harmen Steenwijck.

Life, whatever its pleasures, must end. Vanitas by Harmen Steenwijck (1640s)
The unexplained presence of a skull is certainly startling, especially when considering what still lifes are usually like.

They are a moment frozen in time, one of seeming decadence, with a focus on luxurious foods and materials: really the *opposite* of a memento mori. Still Life by Pieter Claesz (1623)
But the memento mori goes beyond still life, as in this wonderful self-portrait by the great proto-Romantic artist Salvator Rosa, painted in 1647.

The book on the table is by Seneca, and on the skull Rosa is writing "Behold, whither, eventually" in Greek.
One of the most famous memento moris in art is the distorted skull in the foreground of The Ambassadors, painted by Hans Holbein the Younger in 1553.

On the right you can see it from a different angle, revealing the full skull. This is another of art's great mysteries.
And so, returning to van Gogh, we may draw a connection with the memento mori and his smoking skull.

Just before its creation van Gogh had been living with and painting the peasants in Nuenen, whom he depicted rather gloomily, plus becoming sick and poor himself... Farm with Stacks of Peat (1883)
And so, perhaps inspired by the poverty and ill-health in which he been living, van Gogh took the standard practice of modelling human skulls as a chance to say something deeper and profounder.

It certainly says more to us than a typical student's skeleton study: Attributed to John Linnell (1792-1882) a British portrait an
Is it an anti-smoking message? Apparently not. Van Gogh was a heavy pipe-smoker throughout his life and basically lived on tobacco.

And, as he once wrote, "the most beautiful paintings are those one dreams of while smoking a pipe in one's bed."
So that's the memento mori.

But returning to the original question - why did Vincent van Gogh paint the smoking skeleton? - brings us to something fascinating and interminable about art.
Consider: why did Vincent van Gogh paint these sunflowers?

Did he find them beautiful? Did he find their brightness charming? Did he simply wish to experiment with vivid shades of yellow? Was he angry, sad, happy?
We may ask this question about any given painting, and in the absence of an anecdote or explanation from the artist, we must simply speculate about why they painted it.

Though, in the end, it might not even matter. What's important, perhaps, is what a painting means to us.
We shall never be sure why Vincent van Gogh painted the Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette.

Perhaps it was satire, perhaps an artistic statement, perhaps a momenti mori, perhaps a joke, perhaps a playful experiment, maybe none of these... maybe even he didn't know!
We have all probably spent far more time wondering about this question than van Gogh ever did.

Which leaves us with the most important question of all, then: what does it mean to you?
If you enjoyed reading about Van Gogh's smoking skull then you may wish to join the 40k+ readers of my free weekly newsletter, Areopagus.

It features seven short lessons every Friday, including art, architecture, and rhetoric.

Consider subscribing here:
culturaltutor.com/areopagus

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(