Why did Vincent van Gogh paint this skeleton smoking a cigarette in 1886?
The answer is simple: we don't know.
In the absence of any explanation from the painter himself, we simply have to speculate about what prompted van Gogh to paint this rather gloomy, if not morbidly funny, portrait...
It was painted when van Gogh was thirty three and studying (briefly) at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp.
In such academies they used skulls as models for drawing; students would learn both about human anatomy and how to render depth and surface.
Van Gogh also painted these skulls in 1888, which with the smoking skull are three of only four times he ever painted a skeleton.
Was he simply practicing anatomical modelling with his own personal flair? Or was he making fun of the whole, old-fashioned, stuffy process?
We know that van Gogh ran into trouble at the Antwerp Academy.
They, just like the influential Parisian School of Fine Arts, taught painting as it had been in the Renaissance: drawing first, colour later.
This Academic style was about perspective, depth, and "realism".
But we know that van Gogh was less interested in studio realism and more in the feeling of a moment or place, wrapped up in a kaleidoscope of vivid colours.
Less depth and shape, a flatter perspective, unnatural colours, though perhaps realistic in a *different* way.
So, at the very least, we might say that Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette is a mission statement about van Gogh's identity as an artist.
That he rejected the "drawing" and "realism" of the Academy in favour of colour and feeling.
And we might also suppose that the smoking skeleton is a "vanitas" or "memento mori".
This is a genre of painting, popular down the centuries, which can take many forms. The idea is to remind us of the transience of life and the inevitablity and ubiquity of death...
There was a long tradition of painting still lifes with a memento mori.
As in this 1642 work, where we see the finely detailed fabric, careful lighting, and exquisitely realised surfaces of metal and glass and flowers that we associate with the still life.
Along with a skull...
Or in this rather more strikingly composed still life from the same time, by Harmen Steenwijck.
Life, whatever its pleasures, must end.
The unexplained presence of a skull is certainly startling, especially when considering what still lifes are usually like.
They are a moment frozen in time, one of seeming decadence, with a focus on luxurious foods and materials: really the *opposite* of a memento mori.
But the memento mori goes beyond still life, as in this wonderful self-portrait by the great proto-Romantic artist Salvator Rosa, painted in 1647.
The book on the table is by Seneca, and on the skull Rosa is writing "Behold, whither, eventually" in Greek.
One of the most famous memento moris in art is the distorted skull in the foreground of The Ambassadors, painted by Hans Holbein the Younger in 1553.
On the right you can see it from a different angle, revealing the full skull. This is another of art's great mysteries.
And so, returning to van Gogh, we may draw a connection with the memento mori and his smoking skull.
Just before its creation van Gogh had been living with and painting the peasants in Nuenen, whom he depicted rather gloomily, plus becoming sick and poor himself...
And so, perhaps inspired by the poverty and ill-health in which he been living, van Gogh took the standard practice of modelling human skulls as a chance to say something deeper and profounder.
It certainly says more to us than a typical student's skeleton study:
Is it an anti-smoking message? Apparently not. Van Gogh was a heavy pipe-smoker throughout his life and basically lived on tobacco.
And, as he once wrote, "the most beautiful paintings are those one dreams of while smoking a pipe in one's bed."
So that's the memento mori.
But returning to the original question - why did Vincent van Gogh paint the smoking skeleton? - brings us to something fascinating and interminable about art.
Consider: why did Vincent van Gogh paint these sunflowers?
Did he find them beautiful? Did he find their brightness charming? Did he simply wish to experiment with vivid shades of yellow? Was he angry, sad, happy?
We may ask this question about any given painting, and in the absence of an anecdote or explanation from the artist, we must simply speculate about why they painted it.
Though, in the end, it might not even matter. What's important, perhaps, is what a painting means to us.
We shall never be sure why Vincent van Gogh painted the Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette.
Perhaps it was satire, perhaps an artistic statement, perhaps a momenti mori, perhaps a joke, perhaps a playful experiment, maybe none of these... maybe even he didn't know!
We have all probably spent far more time wondering about this question than van Gogh ever did.
Which leaves us with the most important question of all, then: what does it mean to you?
If you enjoyed reading about Van Gogh's smoking skull then you may wish to join the 40k+ readers of my free weekly newsletter, Areopagus.
It features seven short lessons every Friday, including art, architecture, and rhetoric.
Mont-Saint-Michel in France is one of the most famous places in the world.
You've seen thousands of photos of it... but what is Mont-Saint-Michel? Who built it? And when?
This is a brief history of the world's strangest village...
First — where is it?
Mont-Saint-Michel (which is the name of the island, the village, and the abbey) is a tidal island off the coast of Normandy, in northern France.
"Tidal" means that it is surrounded by sea or by land depending on the tides.
Legend says that during the 8th century a bishop called Autbert of Avranches had a dream in which the Archangel Saint Michael told him to build a shrine on the island.
The Archangel Michael, who defeated Satan in battle, was a popular saint at the time.
This unusual house in Turin was built 123 years ago.
It's the perfect example of a kind of architecture unique to Italy, known as the "Liberty Style".
How to make ordinary buildings more interesting? The Liberty Style has an answer...
During the 1890s there was an artistic and architectural revolution in Europe: Art Nouveau.
It means "New Art" in French, and that's exactly what it was — a whole new approach to design, whether of buildings, furniture, clothes, sculpture, or crockery.
There were many genres of Art Nouveau, but what they had in common was a commitment to traditional craftsmanship, the embrace of new materials like iron, and a turn toward flowing designs inspired by nature.
Like the Hôtel Tassel in Brussels, designed by Victor Horta, from 1893:
It's by Grant Wood (most famous for American Gothic) and it's called The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere.
Why does it look like that? Because Grant Wood had one of the most unusual styles in art history...
Grant Wood was born in 1891 in rural Iowa; ten years later the family moved to Cedar Rapids.
He worked at a metal shop, studied at arts and crafts schools in Minneapolis and Chicago, and then became a public school art teacher back in Cedar Rapids.
Humble beginnings.
In the 1920s, while working as a teacher, Wood made several trips to Europe, including a year studying at the Académie Julian in Paris.
There, like so many artists of his generation, he adopted a generic and basically unremarkable Impressionist style:
This is Mount Nemrut in Turkey, one of the strangest ancient ruins in the world.
It's a colossal, 2,000 year old burial mound on top of a mountain, surrounded by huge stone heads.
Who built it? A king who wanted to become a god...
First, where is Mount Nemrut?
It's in the Taurus Mountains, a range in south-eastern Turkey. And, rising to more than 2,000 metres, it's one of the tallest mountains in the region.
It was part of the ancient Kingdom of Commagene, a small state that fought both with and against the Roman Republic, and eventually became part of the Roman Empire.
The tomb-temple at Mount Nemrut was built in 62 BC, when Commagene was an independent kingdom.
In Medieval Europe landscape painting wasn't a genre of its own, and it hardly featured in art at all.
Notice how the background of this 11th century mural indicates the landscape merely by the generic sketch of a castle and an isolated, highly stylised tree:
This changed in the 14th century with Giotto, a revolutionary painter from Florence.
He introduced proper landscapes into his paintings: rocks, trees, flowers, and skies.
But Giotto's version of nature remains highly stylised; this is not a "realistic" landscape.