Yep, there's a lot of sus with Zexi Li.
She couldn't even tell the Commission what department of Shared Services she works at - so I will. Here's a little breakdown, with receipts 🙂
According to her LinkedIn:
Zexi Li graduated from UofO in 2021 with a BCom (Business Tech) degree after 4 years (enrolled 2017).
Started working for CRA immediately after as an Innovation & Technology Advisor.
A little odd for a newbie to get an advisor position, no?
Apparently, after only 9 months, she moved to a Data Analyst position with Shared Services Canada. The org under that department she testified she didn't know is DAT-GOU (Data Governance and Enablement). Weird that she wouldn't know where she works exactly. This is public info.
What's this? Oh, she previously worked for a different Shared Services org in Gatineau, QC - Corporate Accounting, Financial Policy and Control.
Hold on... Position: *student*?
Did she work there while at UofO, before CRA? Or after an *advisor role* at CRA (unlikely)?
Someone noted there were MSM articles where she claimed a truck backed into her & that she took photos and/or videos of it, yet she presented no evidence of that. One would think she'd have brought that forward during the Inquiry.
"Demonstrating disregard and apathy for residents’ suffering, the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) continuously described the occupation as a peaceful, successful protest while Ottawa’s leadership expressed their appreciation in blissful—and perhaps willful—ignorance."
"Let’s be clear: this was not a protest. The intention from the very start was to hold the residents of Ottawa hostage and to make our lives so unbearable that we had no choice but to heed their demands..."
"Combined with their use of a constant barrage
of noise and their imposition of sleep deprivation—an internationally recognized method of torture—it was clearly demonstrated that these individuals could not be reasoned with, negotiated with, or allowed to stay."
"Regardless of their reasons, the OPS observing from a distance while the law was being broken in every direction..."
"Paul Champ and his team had been working on the case but they were having difficulty getting an individual to put their name on it, largely due to valid concerns over safety. After the meeting, Paul Champ called to inform me of the work they were trying to accomplish."
"In particular, the potential for the injunction against noise resonated deeply with me. I agreed to be the lead plaintiff almost immediately.
...
By this point, it was quite clear that our city would not be leading a solution so time was of the essence."
Make of that what you will, I feel there's a lot more questions than answers.
I'll leave you all with a compilation video of police brutality during the events in Ottawa & judge by yourself who was silenced, beaten and oppressed for protesting against the government.