#EthereumClassic is now dominating non-BTC mining. Whether or not that is currently profitable, given the excess of hash which can no longer mine ETH, is another matter.
ETC network hashrate seems to have settled to a new equilibrium close to 150 TH/s. Peak was 300 TH/s.
That was around a 6x gain in hashrate and security since before The Merge.
More importantly, though, is that ETC in now *the* apex predator for POW outside of SHA256 market.
The majority of ETC hash is likely ASICS (I have heard ~70%) which is fantastic.
I wrote this article in February 2020 which I still stand by, and we have arrived in that inevitable destination. Funny that we have an “ASIC resistant” algorithm but here we are, ASIC dominated anyway (market forces always win over central planning): bobsummerwill.com/2020/02/02/asi…
“ECIP-1049 - Change the ETC Proof of Work Algorithm to Keccak256” was a flop, mainly because it was was choosing one group over another group (and the losing group were the existing miners who had invested on the basis of the existing social compact): ecips.ethereumclassic.org/ECIPs/ecip-1049
As others said at the time, the only defensible position is NEVER to change hashing algorithm, barring some catastrophic threat to the network as a whole (ie. quantum computing making the hash insecure), such that consensus can be reached that we HAVE to switch.
So, Etchash it is for the foreseeable future. Welcome to ETC, miners!
We really appreciate the vital role which you play in securing the chain, and in the uniqueness of POW which makes blockchain revolutionary.
We look forward to decades of collaboration and building together!
Here is a handy table of the block rewards per day for all chains which are still GPU-mineable.
After ETC, ETHW and RVN it drops off a cliff, and ETC is double any other chain.
And ETHW will not last given their 🤮 launch and ongoing multi-sig base fee theft.
On that point about ASIC resistance being anti-free-market, @nishantsharma87 (Head of International PR and Community Relations at @BitmainOfficial at the time) expressed it best on the miners panel at #ETCSummit 2019:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I did not spot this article from you at the time, but was delighted to unearth it while Googling for ADEPT and "Device Democracy" recently gendal.me/2014/09/22/dev…
I spoke about it myself at DEVCON2 in Shanghai, and name-checked @pbrody in that talk.
👋 guys!
I last saw Henning Dietrich at @ETHBerlin in 2019 and was told that he was at DEVCON6 last week, but I had no means to contact him.
If anybody has a Telegram handle or email for Henning, please do DM me it. I would love to catch up with him. Very few know his role in early Eth!
CES, February 2015.
ADEPT demo, IBM and Samsung.
Using (very early) Ethereum, Telehash and BitTorrent.
Now you hit the biggest crisis for Ethereum since the DAO and the stakes are orders of magnitudes higher, yet you still have an opaque Swiss foundation with no public information.
@virgilgr was probably #4 (behind Vitalik, Aya and Albert) and he has gone sanctions busting in NK.
Your initial question felt like it was a disingenuous trolling attempt, but I see now that perhaps you are genuinely unaware. Perhaps you joined the whole ecosystem after these events and are playing catch-up?
@rstormsf@belfordz@ConsenSys This split was very bitter at the time, with many people on the ETH majority side (myself included) thinking that ETC chain would die off almost immediately.
At the time there were no examples of contentious hard forks from which both sides survived.