The official story is something like “a billion snow crabs disappeared.”
If that sounds fishy to you, keep reading. Let’s dive into the ecology, oceanography, & geopolitical history of the Bering Sea.
A science thread on crabs, corruption, & collapse: 🦀
To begin, let’s differentiate the two major commercially-exploited and now crashed populations of crab in the Bering Sea: the snow and the king.
Their behavior and life histories are very different. So are their collapses. Let’s start by recounting the recent one: the snow crab.
As sea ice forms in winter, salt is expelled and cold, dense water sinks to the floor of the Bering continental shelf, forming what marine ecologists call the “cold pool”. This is where young snow crabs grow up with abundant food, in water too cold for many predators… until now.
As the planet has heated, the shrinking cold pool has put snow crabs’ backs against the wall. Where once safe, juvenile crabs can be caught by predators like cod penetrating the warming water. Evidence shows the young crabs have followed the pool north.
The cold pool connects the snow crab to climate collapse. But let’s not forget that on top of all these environmental factors is industrial-scale extraction and bycatch by the fishing industry. What role is this playing? We’ll come back to that.
First, let’s study their counterpart: the king. King crabs once numbered in the hundreds of millions in the Bering Sea, but crashed in the early 80s and never recovered, numbering less than 10 million in recent years.
Who killed the king crab?
The story is crazy.
In 1959, Japan established a no-trawl zone protecting the breeding territory of king crabs in the Bering Sea. It was a success. Catches were increasing. But in 1976, everything changed when the US passed a law called the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
The Magnuson–Stevens Act codified a management concept called Maximum Sustainable Yield, directing regulators to pursue maximum extraction of marine life. It also codified the concept of the Exclusive Economic Zone, extending 200 mi. from shore — effectively annexing the reserve.
Then, in 1980 — in the midst of the Cold War — the US and USSR joined forces to trawl the reserve, targeting sole. In a period of five years, bycatch of king crabs increased by more than 600%. King crab populations plummeted to single digit proportions.
These words from the director of @PEERorg, the government employee transparency group who published the whistleblower testimony, should be considered in the context of the more recent snow crab collapse, described by NOAA and echoed by media as a mysterious natural phenomenon:
Many have linked the snow crab collapse to climatic contraction of the sea ice. But it doesn’t seem that warm water alone killed the crabs. Was it all predators? Disease?
Or is it possible the role of the fishing industry has been downplayed yet again?
Geotransmitter data compiled by @GlobalFishWatch indicate fishing vessels took advantage of the contracting sea ice. On the left is winter & spring fishing in 2013, a more normal ice year. On the right is the same season in 2020, during the sea ice lows.
When we dig further into the vessel logs, a striking pattern emerges: scores of ships trawling for hundreds of hours across the Northern reaches of the Eastern Bering Sea floor during critical breeding months in areas where snow crabs once could take shelter beneath the ice.
Corroborating the geospatial data, observer data from @NOAAFisheries stock assessments show a massive spike in snow crab fishing mortality correlating with the record low years for Bering Sea ice.
NOAA assures us trawl bycatch is a small contributor to total crab mortality, but observer data often underestimate collateral deaths, trawl bycatch is just one expression of increased fishing impact, & recall — they said the same thing about king crab.
A lot of commentators rushed out hasty analyses of the US election. Now that the dust has settled & 99% of the votes are counted, let’s talk about the data.
You may have seen this visualization going around, used to assert “the country is moving right”.
That’s not accurate. 🧵
To interpret these proportional shifts as a change in ideology assumes the same voters turned out in 2020 & 2024. This is a false premise.
Republicans gained ~2.6M votes from 2020. Dems lost ~7M.
The “rightward shift” in vote proportions belies a Democratic turnout collapse.
By demographic, we can see that groups being blamed in media for Harris’ loss — Black men, Latinos, young people, etc. — did not vote Republican as much as they simply did not vote.
The world still hasn’t come to reckon with the consequences of the fracking boom.
The US’ scorched-earth gas extraction policy in the late 2000’s opened millions of free-flowing methane vents from shale deposits into the atmosphere —
w/ no sign of stopping.
They told us methane gas was a “clean-burning” “bridge fuel” to renewable energy.
What they left out was that it leaks directly into the atmosphere at every stage.
With even a small amount of leakage, gas emits more GHGs than any other fossil fuel.
Biden suspended 26 federal environmental & humanitarian laws to accelerate construction of the US-Mexico border wall, where thousands of asylum seekers remain incarcerated in internment camps.
He lied about this, saying “not another foot” would be built.
Our story begins in Rhodesia: a now-extinct British colony in Southern Africa.
As Britain had little land and high demand for meat, ranching cattle and sheep for export became an important sector of the Rhodesian economy.
But colonists met some challenges…
There were already grazers on the Zimbabwean savannas: antelope of all kinds, buffalo, zebra, rhinoceros — but one animal above all interfered with the colonial agricultural project: the elephant.
Historic buffalo populations only produced around 1/3 the methane emissions of US cattle ranches today, according to population reconstructions and industry feed trial data.