Jonathan's translucent form Profile picture
Oct 17, 2022 28 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Ebola transmits by air

Believe me (and others) or not, at your peril.

Just the main posts from the main thread. No time.
38 from hospital room? Touch? Sure. Tell me another one.

Infected the control monkeys in biocontainment lab ... by ... air.

Transmitted Ebola from pigs to monkeys via air. Found it in respiratory cells.

"supports the concept of airborne transmission" - they are trying to warn us but editors shut these papers down.

Hypothesis that it is not must cover all these edge cases as droplets, which again, was a made up thing from Chapin 1912.

Plus must account for modelling that shows it superspreads, and 3% of patients are responsible for 60-80% of cases or whatever.

I'm done w this denial
Main thread:



As I said at the top, personally, you believe as you wish. I'm not here to convince anyone. I just can't stand misinformation.
Other misinformation that will arise from denial/lack of crisis training:

Well people are certainly thinking about air on those numbers. Good

I'm not debating. Take it or leave it. Doesn't matter to me. Lots of info on PubMed. All free. People saying droplet haven't read, it's a knee-jerk resp

Not a single person has proven droplet in 3 yrs <shrug>
If you don't agree, no worries. Lots of Twitter left for you to explore :)
Sounds like the locals understood more than some give them credit for.

They don't sound so panicky. They sound pretty darned logical actually, wanting isolation tents.

From WHO publication on Ebola 2014. Image
Image
Didn't even want to come back to this thread but if people talk nonsense they get science back.

"Virtually all cell types" Image
Just one snippet here.

This whole article is a warning. It's just written in scientific language.

Disinformation *IS* a problem.

I will just point out it took me 5 seconds to find MORE refs about Ebola replicating in the lungs. There it is, hit #3 on a simple search. Oh, in fact #2 says it too. Image
Proof of those who assert _no_ replication in lung is on those who assert.

Please produce.
Hits #6 and #7 as well Image
I have another job, but here is the hit right after the CIDRAP one (see pic 1)

And if you pull the actual scientific report being referred to, it says it expressly (see pic 2) Image
Image
Ah, the one two after that, too.

Anyway, enjoy your research, all. Image
Took some heat for this post, then got blocked. Saving this for when I am vindicated. Might take some years.

I'll wait.

waiting patiently :)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan's translucent form

Jonathan's translucent form Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jmcrookston

Oct 14, 2024
@ExtroSpecteur I presume he is saying airborne mitigations should be equally alongside touch or droplet.

No, there is no evidence for any. As I keep saying, but happy to say again, for thousands of years people flipflopped between "it's touch" and "it floats but generates in swamps because ...
@ExtroSpecteur ... they did not understand pathogens. Once they did, referring to respiratory illness, they simply assumed it was droplet because most infections can be traced to an infected having been near the index case. Droplet became an idea with Chapin in 1910, to explain why one needed..
@ExtroSpecteur ...to be close. However, first, their idea of droplet was not necessarily 2 metres. Their idea of airborne was many kilometers, so their discussion of close has to be understood in this context. Two, their investigations were crude, by the 30s air people like Wells
Read 15 tweets
Oct 4, 2024
Rasmussen saying she always believed in aerosols oh come on now 🤡
2021 Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 4, 2024
Another one for the pile.

Call me in two years when you haven't heard anything at all about this vaccine.

And how would it be administered. We take shots every morning?

We have nasal vaccines for flu btw. Still have flu.
But hey 250,000 views. If I wanted to sell books I might post stuff like this. 🤷
Hey here are some other ideas:

sun entering cooling phase which should obviate climate change.

Just bang the like button. That's all we're here for I guess. Let's all be irresponsible. 🤷
Read 6 tweets
Aug 18, 2024
It's always funny to me that virologists get everything and transmission so wrong. I guess because they work with viruses they think they know everything about them. 🤷

The sad part is we would assume that because they work with viruses they know everything about them. Image
*everything about
Virologists don't really work on transmission. Maybe sometimes they spin a tub and flip some in the air or something. But they don't really know what's going on. And then the doctors know the biological clinical side of things but they don't work on transmission either.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 8, 2024
COVID-19 took measles out back and absolutely SHOT IT DEAD.

1 sick player infected 100% OF BOTH HOCKEY TEAMS - 42 people - then another 102 spectators.

172 people in total.

You can watch it sweep the first team then the second team then the stands in the epi curves.

Wow.
A few sick kids at a doctor's office?

Pfft, measles, get out of here you weakly-transmitting pathetic cold of a virus. Even pre-vax you weren't doing this.

SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely mind-blowingly transmissible.
Read 10 tweets
May 8, 2024
Imma help you with this "science speak"
Just remember the ladder of denial and elite panic myth means if you are hearing a 2 it's a 4. If a 4 it's a 6. If a 6 pack your bags. You'll never hear 8 and up the TV will just play static

Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(