JK Rowling opens by mentioning two opponents of GRA reform, Maya Forstater and Helen Joyce.
Forstater has recently been throwing a fit about a non-binary alien children's character.
Joyce was recently photographed smiling over a desecrated pride flag.
JK Rowling also helpfully assures readers that supporting her personal version of women's rights is not, in fact, as brave as Iranian women risking assault, imprisonment and death to stand up against gender inequality.
"Remarkably, nobody seems able to explain what living in an acquired gender actually means."
• Firstly, the requirement for a trans person to live as their gender is *already part of the current law* that Rowling presumably wants to keep. It just takes two years.
• Rowling gives no argument why forcing a trans person to spend two whole years getting their documents updated is somehow better for anyone but bureaucrats and sadists.
• And finally, yes, it can be explained what living in acquired gender actually means:
• The GRA has absolutely *nothing* to do with access to spaces, Jo.
• Trans people who have not undergone surgery have *already* have a legal right to use those spaces since the passing of the Equality Act in 2010 and in many cases before that as well.
• Not only that, but as previously mentioned the currently law requires a trans person to live as their authentic gender for a period of 2 years as part of getting a gender recognition certificate. For trans women, *that includes using the spaces JK Rowling lists*.
• The original FOI requests were about incidents across the entire premises, not just the changing rooms.
• That includes facilities with both unisex and separate changing rooms.
• The Times did not give serious investigation to other possible factors.
It feels unprofessional to describe JK Rowling as having plucked this claim from the depths of her own anus, but I mean... what else can you say to this absolute manure?
Supposedly, this an argument "beloved of trans activists."
Look, if Rowling can find a single, real, genuine trans person or "trans activist" who will earnestly argue that no trans individual on the face of the earth could ever conceivably harm a woman in any way whatsoever, we will delete our account.
What on earth does any of this have to do with trans people?
Why is anyone suppose to take examples of abuses not committed by trans people as any kind of argument that trans people shouldn't be able to update their ID more easily?
JK Rowling, who a few paragraphs ago implied that there were "trans activists" that believed trans people were fundamentally incapable of hurting women, would like to reassure us that "feminists" don't think that all trans people are predators.
"When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. […] They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.
WHEN YOU ARE "DEBATING" THE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS AND SAFETY OF AN ENTIRE CATEGORY OF MARGINALISED PEOPLE THAT SUFFER FROM INCREASED RISKS OF VIOLENCE AND SUICIDE, THE FACT THAT MANY ARE EXTREMELY VULNERABLE **IS** IN FACT THE POINT, ACTUALY!
... I'm sorry, so the very worst thing JK Rowling was able to find out about the GRA reform consultation was that they preferred to receive written rather than spoken evidence from people who, by the sounds of it, did not actually have much evidence on GRA reform?
Some fun facts about Andrea Dworkin:
• Andrea Dworkin was a famously trans-supporting radical feminist.
• She did not believe that sex was binary and opposed biological essentialism.
• She would probably have thought that JK Rowling was a complete and utter prat.
We would like to take a moment to thank JK Rowling, the multi-multi-millionaire who tweets things from her castle, for very generously sharing this opinion regarding people in situations they will never have to face.
The attempt to reform the GRA in Scotland is not new; it's been in the works for years. JK Rowling even referenced it in her 2020 "TERF Wars" manifesto.
And do you want to know the sum total of concrete evidence anti-trans campaigners have amassed in all that time?
Anti-trans campaigners had years to do their research and test their beliefs. They had data from 20 countries that already have so-called "Self-ID" laws for trans people.
And they found nothing that could seriously support their claims.
The absurd claims that Rowling made in her Times article could not have survived journalistic fact checking.
But she is a rich, powerful celebrity, and so her opinions, however unevidenced, however asinine, can be published unchallenged under the guise of "news".
And while JK Rowling is given an endless, unchecked media platform to suggest that GRA reform will lead to rape and violence, the mainstream British media turns a careful blind eye to the real-life heinous actions of the anti-trans movement.
JK Rowling is - I suppose safe in the knowledge that her supporters do not care about facts, evidence, or reality - asking for examples of the many, many times she has spread disinformation.
So here is just a tiny handful of those occasions🧵
Most recently, JK Rowling shared a falsely headlined story about a toddler being removed from a nursery with a fake claim that it was for "being able to recognise sex" that she apparently either completely made up or copied from someone who made it up.
There was the very infamous time that JK Rowling suggested the well documented Nazi attack on the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, and one of the Nazi's most infamous book burnings, was in fact a "fever dream"
This is a bizarre but incredibly important interaction for understanding how JK Rowling's mind works post-radicalisation, and how cult movements and extremist groups are able to function in conflict with seemingly undeniable reality.
A small thread 🧵
... Rowling makes a post suggesting that the Nazi attack on Institut für Sexualwissenschaft was "a fever dream" without a "source"
Alejandra Caraballo responds by giving sources. It's a well documented historical event. Sources are easy to find.
And then things get weirder...
... JK Rowling suggests those sources don't actually count because they don't prove "all research on trans healthcare was burned" or "trans people were the first victims of the Nazis".
Well yeah. They don't claim that.
The tweet Rowling called a fever dream didn't claim that...
This was going to be a short post about yet another victim of JK Rowling being compelled to apologise...
... but unfortunately after a little checking up it's become a thread on how Caolan Robertson appears to be going above and beyond to throw LGBTQ+ people under the bus.
For context, Caolan interviewed India Willoughby about transphobic abuse she'd received on Twitter from JK Rowling.
In turn, Caolan was also targetted by Rowling and received a pile-on from her extremely abusive fanbase.
Caolan used extreme language to respond to Rowling.
Now, conversations about tone policing, hypocracy, and "sinking down to JK Rowling's level" aside, if Caolan wishes to apologise for the specific language he used, fair enough.
But it looks very weird to declare he "respect[s]" her after seeing the behaviour she partakes in...
Irish writer John Boyne has - and we swear this is completely real - tweeted out a bizarre poem apparently attacking gay journalist Owen Jones over his public support for lesbian, gay, bi, and trans people.
The poem is very very very exceedingly not good.
Owen Jones receives relentless abuse and harassment from "Gender Critical" activists due to his sexuality and vocal support for LGBTQ+ people. He has been attacked in the street by far-right homophobes.
John Boyne suggests that he penned his assault on literature in response to Owen Jones explaining why the term "homosexual" is disliked by many gay people due to its history, which Boyne sneers at.
Boyne has also written about how being described as queer is traumatising to him.
Extreme anti-LGBTQ+ MP Rosie Duffield instigates misogynistic harassment against a mother featured on the news because she is allegedly trans.
Duffield has been endorsed on multiple occasions by JK Rowling. She has never condemned Duffield's bigotry or abusive behaviour.
A quick glance at Rosie Duffield's Likes is quite illustrative.
The fury at a mother simply existing while trans is bound up with fury at women for not "correctly" performing womanhood.
"Gender Critical" ideology is built upon misogynistic policing and enforcing stereotypes.
JK Rowling's pal Rosie Duffield featured on this account recently - though not in most of the British media - after her ghoulish reaction to one of Kirsty Blackman's constituents contemplating suicide.
JK Rowling has retweeted a post from Chris Rufo, one of the American extreme right's most influential and dangerous propagandists.
Rufo was the architect behind the "Critical Race Theory" moral panic, which sought to promote racism and forcefully censor schools and universities
Here is Rufo outlining his tactics in promoting racism and demonising anti-racists.
He tacitly admits that, without genuine facts to support his position, his aim is to create a moral panic that will shut down critical thought and propagate lies and racist hysteria.
Anyone familiar with the "Gender Critical" hate movement will recognise these tactics, and it's no surprise that recently Rufo has pivoted to extreme anti-LGBTQ+ and transphobic lobbying.
The bizarre post promoted by Rowling suggests that trans healthcare makes people non-human.