Thursday 🧵 1. In yesterday’s thread, we travelled the grim & dark road that is peat extraction in Ireland. Today, something brighter & jam-packed with potential for the environment in general, & for the climate in particular.
Folks, let’s talk REWETTING & RESTORATION
2. First, we need to define what we mean by #rewetting and #restoration as these terms are frequently used interchangeably and often incorrectly.
3. @IPCC_CH Wetlands Supplement describes #rewetting as the management act (e.g. drain blocking, bund construction etc.) that is carried out to permanently #restore all the functions of the pre-damaged peatland, e.g. water level, plant species, carbon cycling.
4. Others interpret peatland restoration as setting the site on the “pathway to full functioning”. However, for some modified peatland sites, such as grasslands, achieving full restoration will certainly not happen tomorrow and may require many, many human lifetimes.
5. In Canada, restoration is a legal requirement on peat extraction companies once extraction ceases. @RochefortLine and colleagues have been at the forefront of restoration research for decades and their methods have been exported to other countries.
6. In Ireland, one of the first large-scale peatland rewetting projects was established at a former extraction site at Turraun, Co. Offaly in the 1990s by @BordnaMona with the aim to create an amenity wetland.
7. In the following decades, the @BordnaMona Ecology Team (@seewilkie@davidfallon8) fine-tuned rewetting methodology to deliver biodiversity and carbon benefits, rather than for amenity purposes.
Photos: @davidfallon8
8. Currently, under the Peatlands Climate Action Scheme, @bnm have committed to rewet 33,000 hectares of peatland (slightly less than 50% of their land holdings). @stephenbarry01 & colleagues are investigating carbon exchange at a number of locations.
10. So, does rewetting work from a carbon perspective? Does it plug the enormous emissions from degraded sites? Does it lay the groundwork for carbon sequestration?
11. The first peatland carbon exchange research carried out at Turraun in 2002/03 was not promising. As the site had not been rewetted with carbon storage in mind, the water table fluctuated considerably with the result that it lost more carbon than it took in.
12. However, at the same time, new rewetting techniques (bunds, cells) were being put in place at sites, such as Bellacorick, Co. Mayo that were proving to be very successful in keeping the site wet and the carbon locked in. Photos: @seewilkie
13. Between 2009 and 2013, we monitored carbon exchange at that site and found that water levels stayed up, CO2 emissions had stopped, methane emissions were relatively low, and we were in bonus territory with considerable CO2 uptake 🥳🥳🥳
13. Other peatland rewetting studies in Ireland using similar techniques have since confirmed the very promising results from Bellacorick.
14. Our most recent 5-year study at Moyarwood bog, Co. Galway has just been published. The 230-hectare site was drained in the 1980s for industrial extraction that never took place. Drain blocking was carried out in 2012/2013 and we commenced carbon measurements immediately.
15. Our results showed that drain blocking was incredibly successful in rising the water table and the site rapidly switched from losing around 6 tonnes CO2 per hectare per year to taking up (sequestering) around 5 tonnes. GAME ON!!
16. While rewetting also resulted in a large surge of methane emissions, modelling work indicated that the site was having a less warming effect on the climate than the drained site, & that we can expect it to have a cooling climate effect by 2085, similar to natural sites.
17. Similar findings have been reported for peatlands elsewhere (see work by @terhorab
& @VytasH for example). Peatland rewetting is a triple win 👇
18. The last few years have seen the establishment of a plethora of peatland carbon monitoring projects across the country specifically looking at post-extraction peatlands (e.g. @CarePeat). We await their findings with great interest.
Photos: @AitovaInNature@matts20000
19. In summary, evidence from Ireland and abroad clearly shows the environmental and climate benefits from rewetting peat extraction sites.
REWET & RESTORE, my friends, REWET & RESTORE.
20. If this thread has sparked an interest in carbon and rewetted peatlands, feel free to visit and download any of the publications I have been involved with over the last 2 decades. Great bedtime reading. earthymatters.ie/publications
21. Tomorrow, I’ll be talking about forestry, carbon and peatlands.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Friday 🧵
1.After our journey through wet peatlands yesterday, we return to drier footing today. For this thread, we’ll go down to the woods and have a look at how forests planted on peat affect the carbon stored within.
Photos: @flo_renouwilson@JonayJovani
2.Forests in Ireland cover approximately 11% of the country but are largely monocultures composed of coniferous trees, such as Sitka and Norway Spruce.
3. In 2021, forests planted on peat soils were estimated to cover 453,000 hectares of the country (approx. 37% of the forest total), much of which was planted in the second half of the 20th century driven by State incentives.
Wednesday 🧵
1.For the past two days, I have described the invaluable & critical role that natural peatlands play in regulating the global climate through the sequestration & storage of atmospheric carbon.
Today, our thread takes us on a dark, dark road.
👉 PEAT EXTRACTION
2. Ireland has a long tradition of cutting turf for heating homes and cooking food that stretches back through centuries. I am not going to get into the economic rationale for cutting turf in this thread. Today, we are here solely for the carbon.
Photo: arthouseireland.com
3. Estimates of the area of Irish peatlands that have been affected by peat domestic extraction vary widely from 100,000 to over 600,000 hectares. The area under industrial extraction is marginally more accurate at 80,000 hectares, although even that number is very uncertain.
Tuesday 🧵 1. Today, I want to talk about carbon cycling in natural peatlands, as these ecosystems provide the baseline against which we assess damaged sites & evaluate restoration success. Plus, they act as the “canary-in-the-mine” for ongoing & future climate change.
2. A natural peatland is undamaged, drained or modified and is characterised by a persistently high water table that ensures that more carbon goes into the system than goes out. The old adage that a wet bog is a good bog holds true here.
3. In Ireland, very little (if any) of our peatlands can be considered natural. Instead, we use the terms near-natural and near-intact to accept the fact that all our sites have been modified to some extent.
Monday thread 🧵 1. At this stage, I think most people are aware that the overwhelming scientific evidence indicates that humans have had a direct impact on the climate through the increased emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane.
2. Over the last 40 years alone, the concentrations of both CO2 and methane in the atmosphere have increased significantly and have contributed to the observed rise in global air temperatures.
3. Peatlands have played a unique role in regulating the global climate over the last 10,000 years by sequestering (taking up) CO2 from the atmosphere, releasing methane (another carbon gas) back, and storing vast amounts of carbon in the process. Map: @greifswaldmoor
Good morning folks.
I'm David Wilson (@peatyGHG) and I'll be taking you on a whistle-stop tour of carbon, peatlands and climate this week.
1. First, let me give you some background. I’m an environmental consultant/scientist, so not strictly an environmentalist.
2. As a young fella, I worked for many years on my uncle’s beef sucker farm, where we also grew seed potatoes for export (my love affair with potatoes continues to this day – both growing and eating).
@GrimesRoisin here, finishing off @SimonGray14 & I's week taking over this account. I wanted to add to this thread & cover a few other techniques we've tried. I'll start with a little more on the wool log trials 1st...1/15
The trial plot has 15-20 wool logs and a few coir logs for comparison. The wool logs are installed the same way as the coir, and made by Terry and Aidan by hand. They've gone very 'squishy' within a few months in comparison to coir, so likely need to be packed in tighter... 2/15
And we're fairly certain they'll break down quicker, so maybe only able to replace coir in areas of lower surface flow. Lots of other aspects to consider, like potential nutrient leeching, netting material etc. But, testing & research still needed so I'll reserve judgement...3/15