Getting ready for Clinical Controversies in treatment of S. aureus bacteremia. #IDWeek2022
Increasing recognition that 'persistent' bacteremia should probably be earlier rather than later. Each day longer, associated with increased metastatic complications and mortality.
What is best treatment? ASP or cefazolin? Issues of increased toxicity vs cefazolin inoculum effect.
>>> we need to test in a clinical trial
If still BC+ at 5 days?
No routine role for combination antibiotics - no benefit with rifampin, daptomycin, aminoglycosides in trials
Patient case now still BC+ at 11 days after adding rifampin and linezolid
Next Brian Werth @bdubrx on non standard therapies (lipoglycopeptides, orals)
Oral switch - not controversial for uncomplicated SAB; but less clear for complicated SAB - most data is retrospective and heterogenous. No MRSA in POET. Most studies switch to 2 drugs.
Long acting lipoglycopeptides (LPG)
Cross resistance to vanc & dapto
Dalba - 30 min infusion
Many advantages to single dose / weekly dose
Prescription data - increasing use of dalba, including for invasive infections
Studies heterogenous in quality and data availability
Dalbavancin probably stays above MIC for up to 12 weeks! Even AUC/MIC 111 at 8 weeks.
This can be good, but may lead to overtreatment / dysbiosis / more selection for resistance
When studied in vitro - see development of resistance to vanc, then dapto, then dalba.
Described in 4 clinical case series / reports.
Selection may be reduced by combining with nafcillin
New topic: daptomycin + TMP/SMX
An under-appreciated combination
Steed AAC 2012 and Werth AAC 2014 - clearly synergistic - similar to that with DAP + CPT
But very few case reports of use of the combination
Appears that synergy occurs with DAP susc and DAP resistant; but need TMP/SMX susceptibility
Need for RCTs - mention of DOTS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gianella CMI 2020. Lower mortality in those who had follow-up BC done -> 2 fold reduction.
Maskarinec CMI 2020. 1702 patients. FUBC in 68%. 20% FUBC persistently positive. Higher mortality if no FUBC. If done, FUBC+ higher mortality
I haven't read the studies, but do wonder about both immortal time bias and bias by indication in these studies. Is there something systematically different in those who do get FUBC?
Amipara EClinicalMedicine 2021
766 patients. Excluded if died within 72h. Propensity score adjustment
If FUBC not done, higher mortality. About 0.5 hazard ratio.
So the above 3 studies, consistently found 2 fold decline in mortality if FUBC done.
Infliximab - about 500 in active and placebo arms; no diff in time to recovery. 41% lower odds of day 28 mortality, 32% higher odds of clinical status at day 14.
No diff in adverse events
Abatacept - about 500 in active and placebo; no diff in time to recovery, Reduced odds of day 28 mortality. No diff in adverse events, with slightly higher bacterial infections (not stats sig).
Debating role of vancomycin for MRSA at #IDWeek2022.
Dr Wagner argues that increasing duration of MRSA bacteraemia associated with poorer outcomes (mortality).
I accept this.
BUT, therapeutically reducing duration of bacteraemia has not been associated with improved mortality.
Duration of bacteremia is a SURROGATE. Although logical and biologically plausible that reducing duration of bacteremia with a particular antibiotic (vs another) should improve the outcome we care about (mortality), this has not yet been demonstrated.
Cites 43% of patients with trough-based dosing develop AKI.
We didn't find this in CAMERA2. Almost all on vanc and trough-based dosing. In control arm only 6% developed AKI. jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
Yes, that was in the context of a clinical trial. But 6% is far from 43%