Suds G Profile picture
Oct 22 15 tweets 5 min read
The #FATFgreylist normalisation, the F16 package, this is just a Dem regime doing what they do best, push for closer ties with Pakistan. A thread.
1/n The pivot towards Pakistan started under LBJ, his administration explicitly wanted a weaker India. R Nixon then continued this policy.
Carter famously threatened to sanction us if we continued our nuclear experiments and even signed a presidential order
2/n banning export of fisile material to us. Carter initiated Op Cyclone that completely deprioritsed India over Pakistan.

Reagan righted this keel, they provided increased aid, military equipment, even high tech gas turbines for our indigenous vessels.
3/n Dubya Sr then took it to the next level (relative to what it was then), he pushed for the DTAA, approved sale of high speed computers for our space program, when a GoI entity took over a US firm operational in India, he purposely stayed away from intervention.
4/n Then came Clinton and his post Pokhran sanctions,

It was a R, Dubya who again thawed it out.

He did ban Modi from entry but Obama continued the policy and used the USCIRF to vehemently attack Modi and India. Dubya also pushed the landmark Nuclear treaty.
5/n Hillary and her pal Huma Abedin were and are virulently anti India. Under her advise Obama pumped in billions of $ into Pakiland as aid while it is Trump who has been cutting it.

Hillary hated India so much that on her first tour to Asia as a secy of state, she skipped India
6/n Obama hyphenated Kashmir with Pakistan unequivocally, restricted H1B visas. The first POTUS to do so.

His choice of Ambassador was Roemer, a strident advocate of the US negotiating a settlement on Kashmir which is against India's bilateral stand since the Shimla agreement.
7/n In the meantime, Obama gave out

• $ 7.5bn in aid to Pakistan in Oct 09,
• $3.5bn in 2010
• $3.5bn in 2011

When the Republicans wanted to block aid to Pakistan in 2016, Obama fought tooth and nail against it.
8/n Bill Clinton was another pro Pakistan, anti India Potus.

Clinton applied the super 301 clause choking many industries.

Reagan approved sale of Cray Super computers, Clinton blocked this.

Al Gore called Punjab, Khalistan
9/n Robin Rapahel a known India hater& Paki lover held a lot of power in the Dept of State. The is when the latest block 52 fighters were offered to Pakiland.

Bush imposed Pressler amendment on Pakiland that Rapahel helped repeal allowing full flow of arms & funds to Jihadland
10/n Bush had blocked monies paid for F16's which Clinton refunded in full.

Robin in her official capacity as Asst Secy of state literally questioned the Instrument of Accession and said India had to hold a plebiscite.

Clinton followed suit and raised this issue in the UN.
11/n Post the 93 Mumbai blasts, Republicans wanted Pakistan declared a state sponsor of terror. Rapahel convinced her boss Clinton to stand down.Clinton totally ignored these blasts then.

Rapahel + the Clinton administration insisted that India had to talk with Kashmiri jihadis
11/n Rapahel and her boss helped overtly and covertly the creation of the Hurriyat conference AND later insisted Delhi include this body in all negotiations.

Clinton's term 2 was no different. His secy of state, Albright hated India, wanted a plebiscite in Kashmir,
12/n supported Pakistan openly and was a turd to Indian interests while supporting Paki ones.

It was Bill Clinton that set up the shitty USCIRF (that had reps from all faiths but Hinduism, not sure if it is any different now) and used it to beat India.
13/n Fun bonus - Joe Biden sponsored a law in 1991 that promised aid to Russia IF it stopped the sale of cryogenic engines to India.

Every Democrat president after Kennedy has been anti India, anti Hindu and pro Pakistan and pro Jihad

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Suds G

Suds G Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SudsG5

Mar 8
There is a lot of chatter about how the Russian army has underperformed, how it was / is a paper tiger etc etc. Leaving aside the fact that Western propaganda only gives us one side, the Ukranian side, let's look at some possible tactical / strategic reasons. Thread.
1/n The same reason the Americans struggled in Vietnam, or managing the insurgency in Iraq / Afghanistan. Or the Soviets themselves in Afghanistan.

Soviet and later Russian doctrine envisages fast mobile wars with loads of artillery to soften the offense.
2/n A typical Russian Brigade has 2 Arty and 1 rocket arty battalions as support (the US by comparison has only 1 arty battalion for support). Typical Russian doctrine would have massive waves of arty followed by fast moving armour pushed into the gaps formed by these arty preps.
Read 19 tweets
Mar 7
Nice to read but in reality Indian emperors often ravaged towns and cities too. The differences here with Christian and Islamic empires being this was not motivated by Faith, or creed.
Take the campaigns of Raja Raja Chola in Chalukya territory or his utterly destructive wars in Sri Lanka (that saw the ancient Sinhala seat of power Annuradapura sacked to the ground), there are plates that talk about how Brahmanas (in Chaklukyan territory) were killed
Or how women "lost their caste" (this is a direct translation by K A N Sastry that I take to mean rape). How cities were sacked.

The invasion of Narasimha Pallava was was just as destructive.

But yes the wholesale total wars of the west or middle East were more often
Read 4 tweets
Dec 12, 2021
With the #UkraineWillResist crisis heating up, here is a primer on why braindead US actions and foreign policy is responsible for this.

Thread.

1/n America under Bill Clinton didn't care much for democracy and rigged the 1996 elections blatantly.
2/n in which Putin was on the sure to win but eventually los. Many tactics were deployed including a till then record IMF handout, large portions of which were used to grease palms, provide liberal doles etc. All of $ 10bn of it. (washingtonpost.com/archive/busine…)
3/n
Approved in the end of Mar 1996, the sum was $10bn, of which a no conditions attached payout of $1bn was made immediately. Which was unprecedented.

Quote "The fund's 24-member executive board approved the three-year loan despite misgivings about the future of e
Read 23 tweets
Dec 10, 2021
Say what you want of the private sector but in terms of sheer efficiency they are unmatched.

I moved cities, reached my new city last night at 1230 AM.

Woke up at 0800 and since then

1- got my house thoroughly deep cleaned @urbancompany_UC. Placed an order on the app at 0030
Last night, they showed up promptly at 0930, just wrapped it up.

2- booked an @airtelindia broadband connection last evening, 0930 they showed up, by 1030 am online and got a free landline connection to boot.

3- registered online for my gas connection yesterday
The delivery guy shows up with the cylinder at 1030, and now the gas connection is set.

4- thanks to @amazonIN 99% of my house is ready to be unpacked and installed. From white goods like my TV to simple things like table coasters, all delivered over 48 hours
Read 5 tweets
Nov 18, 2021
Let the lies and lies on Chacha commence for the billionth time.

theprint.in/opinion/nehru-…
1/n a personality no less than Ambedkar thought his foreign policy deeply flawed. It left us isolated and weak. Our neighbour Pakistan hitched it's stars to the US orbit and till the mid 2000's had much higher economic parameters.
2/n To will away the problem of Kashmir and China as "hey it was a mistake let's just chill", these have a serious impact on India to this very day. India has spent $100's of billions on border defense and securing Kashmir. Lost 10's of thousands of soldiers and more civilians
Read 10 tweets
Nov 17, 2021
Let's look at data and see what it tells us. If I take rapes of Indian women, liberandus will be like, but under reporting is 100000000 times. So let's take unimpeachable, 100% reported data. Rape of foreign, white women.
1/n the UK foreign office (the US state department doesn't publish such a report afaik) publishes a report on crimes committed by and on UK residents abroad.

In the period 2016-18, sexual assaults reported per country / annum.

Spain - 218 / 72 pa
Turkey - 68 / 23 pa
2/n Thailand & France - 41 / 14 pa

India - 1/ 1

Pre covid, India hosted 1mn Brit tourists. Assume even 40% were women, 400,000 UK women visited India per year, that's 1.2mn female visitors over 3 years and India had 1 case of Rape.

Don't believe me?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(