New from @pamela_herd & I: the Biden administration's loan forgiveness application is so well-designed that it turned an administrative process into a moment of joy.
Governments are deeply attuned to failure, something we call negativity bias. This creates vicious cycles of blame avoidance. But if we want better government, we also need to celebrate and learn from successes.
So thanks to NYT for giving us space to write about a success story!
Without much formal promotion 22 million people signed up for a one-off benefit in a week, 8 million during an unannounced beta test period. That is amazing!
It reflects a government devoting time and resources to the unglamorous but vital work of policy implementation.
Administrative burdens arise partly via policy design, implementation design choices & administrative resources.
For example, the Biden admin made the process more burdensome by means-testing ($125K limit), but reduced the documentation requirements via self-attestation.
An even less burdensome approach would have been to automatically discharge debt. The Dept of Ed has done
this for borrowers it has income data for. It could do it for all 40M eligible borrowers, but lacks IRS income data.
We need to improve govt data-sharing to reduce burdens.
One other source of burdens is privatization, which often creates confusion and fragmentation (e.g. private lenders in the PSLF). The beauty of the current student loan relief process is that the borrower is interacting directly with one actor: the government.
Two big points here:
*The quality of the student loan application is not a one-off. Lots of very talented and competent people are trying to make it the norm
*It's not all on them. legislators can reduce or create admin burden in their policy design choices.
At the moment, a conservative court has paused the Biden admin's ability to process the applications, which would have started as soon as this weekend. But you can still submit for loan forgiveness while the case is being determined. studentaid.gov/debt-relief/ap…
If you don't have a subscription, here is an ungated version of our piece about student loan relief here: nytimes.com/2022/10/23/opi…
If you are interested in learning more about administrative burdens and student debt relief, you can sign up for my newsletter. donmoynihan.substack.com
I wrote something about the effects of the de-facto court injunction and what happens next: donmoynihan.substack.com/p/i-wrote-in-t…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The connections are pretty clear. Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society helped bankroll the work of Ginni Thomas. He also arranged for Clarence Thomas to attend Koch fundraisers. propublica.org/article/claren…
The shared purpose of Leonard Leo, Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas and the Koch network was to put right-wing judges on the court. And Clarence Thomas used his public position on the court to raise money for that.
Clarence Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine, which allows delegation to administrative expertise. But the people who fund the Koch network can't buy off administrators, so they want to remove their influence from the process. Now Thomas agrees with the donors.
Also this guy: young people today can't afford a house because they occasionally buy new clothes
If the people @FinancialReview care for free speech at all, they will do the decent thing and allow replies to this tweet, allowing a full and frank exchange of views.
America has 22 times the firearm homicide rates as the European Union.
We are less safe and less free because of how available guns are in this country. healthdata.org/news-events/in…
America makes up about 15% of gun homicides, and together with five other countries constitutes half of gun homicides in the world. vox.com/2018/8/29/1779…
The reason more people in America are dying from guns is because there are more guns in America.
America is the only country with more guns than people. cnn.com/2021/11/26/wor…
New, from me: I wrote about how the emerging debacle at New College (one-third of faculty gone, students can't find classes, housed in airport hotels) reflects the incompetence of populists like DeSantis.
Competence, the ability to perform organizational core tasks, is an underrated quality. It is an especially overlooked quality by people who value other things, like ideological goals, or believe that existing institutions are corrupt, or who have never actually run things.
Fuck Around (left, celebrating the firing of a faculty who criticized the Regents)
and
Find Out: (right, soliciting faculty applications because you don't have enough to teach classes - one-third have left for some reason).
The DeSantis takeover of New College was meant to offer a model of a conservative-run higher ed.
The result is chaos, which is what happens when incompetent people who don't actually care about organizational mission take over public services. insidehighered.com/news/students/…
The NY Times recently featured Chris Rufo to explain how DEI was undermining liberal education.
You know what actually undermines a liberal education?
Losing one-third of faculty.
Not offering core classes to students.
Raging incompetence and blind indifference.
Rufo is seeking to personally recruit replacements. Which is completely at odds with what university trustees are supposed to do. No way that could go wrong, right?
From the internal Texas A&M reports: it was A&M Regents who signaled their opposition to McElroy, at which point the university figured out they would not tenure her.
Seems like the Regents cost A&M $1M. Nice job.
: ... tamus.edu/wp-content/up
Not great when a university President is saying "I'm assuming all texts were deleted" and then tells faculty she was not involved in hiring process. (She has since resigned).