Chelsea-Manchester United: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
- Why did Man Utd find so much in the first 35 minutes in midfield?
- United's out of possession off-ball structure looking really good
-Potter's substitution changes the game
With Chelsea's front 3 pressing with Jorginho not too far behind but not really man to man anyone, defender Chilwell and even Cucurella in a back three would race forward to try create turnovers dragging defenders wildly out of position
With Mount playing in the 3 and the press not always being intense and passive letting United have the ball deep in their own defence, Jorginho hovered sort of marking space looking to make an interception or tackle rather than stick tight to a player
When Jorginho wasn't cutting off the passing lane to Eriksen hoping to make a tackle instead. Loftus Cheek was occupied with Casemiro leaving Fernandes free to hover and Chelsea overran in midfield.
This dragged out Azpilicueta trying to cover for the large gap in midfield, as Fernandes exchanged with Eriksen who could play in Shaw darting into the space left by Azpilicueta to shoot wide. The first phase press made it easy for Eriksen to receive and exploit the midfield two
The distances between Chelsea's front 3 and United's defence was alarming as it let Utd easily play out from the back. Chelsea's front 3 were not in close proximity themselves meaning they barely squeezed the pitch or cut off passing lanes. Jorginho again wasn't close to Casemiro
Instead it seemed Chelsea were more keen to use the wide areas as a pressing trigger which only dragged defenders out of position. Jorginho opted to zonally mark space in anticipation of where the ball might go (maybe to Antony) before it was too late to tackle Casemiro
With Loftus Cheek caught in two minds as to whether to mark Eriksen or Fernandes, it let Fernandes receive between the spaces of defence and a scant midfield where Eriksen and Fernandes were available options. As Eriksen really should've played Rashford in here
With Mount-Aubamayeng-Sterling not really tracking back or dropping in when Chelsea didn't have the ball they had to defend in a 4+2 at times or a very staggered 5+2 but with defenders dragged all over the pitch
For the first 35 mins Martinez could use his excellent ability to pass progressively through the lines to find a spare midfielder, with no attacker picking up any of the midfield 3 and simultaneously Loftus Cheek and Jorginho finding it difficult to stick to Eriksen or Fernandes
Selectively, Chelsea would press Casemiro-Eriksen receiving from defence with the midfield pivot, perhaps trying to stop Casemiro distributing as he had some trouble in his 1st game when pressed, but Eriksen-Casemiro found it simple to dictate the game and spray passes wide
It was almost like Chelsea had forgotten the need to press Martinez (Utd's main distributor from defence) and wanted to press Casemiro/Eriksen but not consistently. Even with Sterling-Mount dropping in to create a midfield four here, they aren't cutting off the wide options
On occasion one of Chelsea's midfield two would get attracted to an inverted full-back leaving a little more space in midfield and letting the opposite full-back stretch the pitch wide as Chelsea shifted over slightly allowing for that quick switch of play
United out of possession are really starting to look formulated. We saw it work (to a degree) vs Arsenal, brilliantly vs Spurs and now Chelsea. Pressing in a 3+2 matching Chelsea's back 3 and midfield 2, with the wide wingers on the wide CB's, Fernandes-Eriksen on the midfield 2
With Rashford pressing Kepa, United's 3+2 ensured Chelsea couldn't play it into defence, forcing them to go for clipped balls over the top wide, where the full-back would jump on the winger receiving, squeezing Chelsea into a small space
The disciplined, organised structure out of possession is a massive boost for United under Ten Hag in only 3 months. As it isn't the 1st time they have been able to halt a team building up smoothly from the back by limiting the centre of the pitch, restricting teams playing out
The structure created one of United's best opportunities, with Chelsea trying to play out from the full-backs, the inside midfield passing option was cut off by Fernandes and the forward pass cut off by Eriksen, Chelsea went long to Sterling which Martinez aggressively won
It's worth noting how close United's players are in this off-ball structure going man to man making it difficult for Chelsea
Potter had seen enough and credit must be given to recognise the wide open spaces in midfield sooner rather than later. To stem the bleeding Kovacic came on as an extra man in midfield so him and Loftus Cheek could jump on Fernandes-Eriksen with Mount following Casemiro
This still allowed Jorginho to hover zonally which I guess Potter wanted for him to mop up or intervene as United found it harder to smoothly transition the ball from defence to attack with less space in midfield.
Ten Hag responded in the 2nd half subbing on Fred, probably wanting to win more duels or press Chelsea in midfield a little more harrying them in possession
The 2nd half was a stop start game with neither team really able to sustain attacks cancelling each other out. However, United's improved midfield understanding and good shape out of possession certainly show good signs so early on
End of thread!
As always thanks for reading, all likes/comments appreciated, sorry for the slight delay (tech issues)
As usual will be going through this in more detail on my substack dharnish.substack.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Manchester United-Manchester City: Analysis (a thread)
▪️How Michael Carrick nullified Pep Guardiola, comprehensively beating City
Whilst in attack United were fast. direct, had pace on the wings and up front as well as there best player playing in his best position, it was without the ball where United stopped City then wasted no time in going forward.
City tried to build-up with a wide 3 and often, Rodri and Bernardo were wary that they weren't creating space as they both dropped deeper. But the 4 in midfield and 2 up top sitting off kept the middle compact and the wide wingers of Semenyo-Doku quiet.
Analysing Ruben Amorim's 4-3-3/4-2-4 Manchester United vs Bournemouth (a thread):
Has the Portuguese manager finally shifted and is it worth the risk?
▪️Advantages, weaknesses
▪️Overlapping defenders
There was reports from before the game that Amorim was finally shifting his coveted 3-4-3 to a 4-3-3. It was pretty clear throughout the game and early on vs Bournemouth that there had been a tactical shift that offered more flexibility and made United more unpredictable.
Teams normally press United's back 3 with their own front 3. But because there was no longer a wide full-back pushed up the pitch and more of a flat back 4, there was an option to pass to wide as well as space for Casemiro in the middle of the pitch with Fernandes pushed up
Newcastle United-Arsenal: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
How Arsenal used central half-space wingers giving them variety in attack.
The positioning of Trossard and Eze centrally meant there was always two players in behind Newcastle United's midfield and offered Arsenal a threat, because whenever there was a gap in Newcastle's midfield, a line-breaking pass from defence would find a player in the middle.
It's interesting because playing Newcastle away is meant to be one of the toughest tests of an attack particularly with how Arsenal struggled to create last season, but with this tweak it means they can drag players wide (Trossard) and find players in the half-space (Merino)
Manchester United-Arsenal: Tactical Analysis Thread
▪️Bayindir cutting through Arsenal's press
▪️Man Utd's pressing
It's wildly ironic that Bayindir's mistake was the reason Manchester United lost but he was a huge reason United got into Arsenal's half often too. What this system does for United is create situations that make the opposition press high, as Arsenal committed players high
It led to situations like this. Bayindir would cut through Arsenal's press to find a forward for a United forward (Mbeumo) to be released in behind. The problem Arsenal had was how many men they committed in the press, as United used a dropping forward to play off of
Manchester United Pre-Season: Detailed Analysis (a thread) Part 1
▪️Improved Progression, Better Movement aided by the 10's
▪️Going direct if needed
A big problem for Man Utd last season was the stagnant, stand-still ball progression. They'd get it in defence find no space in the centre and launch it up to Hojlund in hope. There has been improvement on this in pre-season, mainly because of better movement from the 10's
Well, it's the two 10's and the midfield pivot, as you can see from below: Fernandes and Cunha are very deep, allowing the full-backs to push on but also dragging West Ham players out of position
Liverpool - Newcastle United: Tactical Analysis (a thread)
▪️How Newcastle United nullified Liverpool in the Carabao Cup final
Newcastle's press was excellent, it kept pushing Liverpool back. The key component was a full-back pushing up from defence to close down a Liverpool defender (Quansah) on the ball, just behind them meanwhile the midfield 3 matches up with Liverpool's midfield 3
As Guimarães tracked Mac Allister, Tonali would jump on Gravenberch and Joelinton tracked Szoboszlai's movements, because a Newcastle full-back would push up high it forced Liverpool long often, stopping their progression in the middle of the pitch and having them go long