Jonathan Cohn Profile picture
Oct 26 6 tweets 3 min read
I've said previously who you think "won" a debate usually says more about which candidate you support than how that candidate performed. I still think that. I'm not even sure how you define "win." Most truthful? Most articulate? Most engaging? ... #MIGov
But after the last #MIGov debate, I noticed conservatives flooding twitter with declarations that Dixon won -- I guess because she had some good lines and looked like she belonged on the stage. Not how I saw it. ...
So in case that happens again, following #MIGov debate 2, I'd just like to note that Whitmer -- to my eyes and ears -- was sharper, seemed more engaged, and had a lot more to say about what she's actually done and what she wants to keep doing ...
And while both candidates dodged some questions, stretched truth here and there, Dixon seemed -- again, by my lights, pending a closer review of the notes -- to be doing a lot more of both. #MIGov
Not sure how much that matters. Ultimately, how you vote should depend on which candidate's views are closest to yours, which one you trust most to govern. I'm not sure a debate tells you that. #MIGov ...
But these post-debate tweets have a habit of shaping perceptions, for media and funders etc., so I hope anybody drawing a judgment on #MIGov will actually watch the debate or read a transcript, rather than going by tweets.

Including mine!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Cohn

Jonathan Cohn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CitizenCohn

Oct 27
Epstein is "hard-core MAGA," as Steve Bannon once put it.

She wants to "minimize" federal funding, which she says means federal control. UM among top recipients of such $$$, which underwrites its world-class research.

Can't replace that with banners.
The whole Bannon interview is worth watching if you want a sense of where she's coming from, what she wants to do. rumble.com/v11hpzl-the-ca…
If you've heard of Epstein, it's because she was the Trump/MAGA Republican who ran for Congress against Haley Stevens back in 2018. Epstein didn't win, but she did make some news.

@joshtpm can tell you about that. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/never-g…
Read 5 tweets
Sep 23
This is a principled position for Republicans, who voted against the Democratic Rx reforms. It's also politically hazardous.

These reforms consistently poll well, even when voters hear counter-arguments.

axios.com/2022/09/23/gop…
See, for example, the polling from @KFF kff.org/health-costs/p…
I would imagine Kevin Brady saying that repeal of the Rx provisions would be a "top priority" for Republicans is in the script of an advertisement Democrats are crafting this very minute.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 22
"Top Republican Healthcare Message" seems to be a set of broad principles that don't make especially clear the actual GOP position on health care -- i.e., their opposition to the Rx pricing system Dems just enacted.
The policy platform that appeared online briefly this week, before GOP leaders took it back down, was a little more specific on this point. huffpost.com/entry/kevin-mc… Image
Which, by the way, is an intellectually coherent view that plenty of serious people have.

There is an honest and important debate to be had over tradeoffs between regulation and innovation -- how real those tradeoffs are, how new policies affect them, etc.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4
Democrats are making a big play for seniors in the midterms, citing

(a) the Medicare drug price reforms they just enacted

(b) threats to Social Security and Medicare by the likes of Rick Scott.

@Robillard has the details (1/x) huffpost.com/entry/democrat…
As @Robillard notes, seniors turn out more reliably in midterms and in recent elections they’ve skewed Republican — although Ds kept margin close in 2018, helping them to their big sweep that year. (2/x) huffpost.com/entry/democrat…
You can see this playing out in Arizona, where Sen. Mark Kelly (D) is focusing on Rx prices, Social Security and opponent Blake Masters (R) is trying to downplay/walk back past support for Social Security privatization.

Again, @Robillard has details (3/x) huffpost.com/entry/democrat…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 2
This is wild.

So that Michigan abortion rights petition, the one that deadlocked the election board because of no spaces between some words?

Turns out spaces are there electronically, but for some reason don’t display on official copy.

@jonathanoosting shows it here:
Full backstory in the @BridgeMichigan article

Apparently removal of an extra “the” in the text of the original somehow triggered a set of changes in the display, and effect was to compress a bunch of spaces between words.

bridgemi.com/michigan-gover…
Anyway there’s never been any real ambiguity over meaning of the amendment, which got what appears to be a record number of signatures and has a good chance of passing — but only if the state Supreme Court acts.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28
Looks like another Republican candidate has removed abortion language from his website.

This time it’s Tom Barrett, who is challenging Elissa Slotkin for a U.S. House seat in Michigan.

Via @nannburke @CraigDMauger detroitnews.com/story/news/pol… Image
Barrett said he was unaware of the change, adding that they try to keep website current with most important issues — and abortion, he says, isn’t one.

An interesting statement, given that Michigan voters identified abortion as their top issue in not one but two polls this week. Image
Btw a plug here for local journalism.

This is from @detroitnews whose writers — alongside counterparts from @freep @MLive @BridgeMichigan @MichiganAdvance @MichiganRadio — are producing amazing Michigan politics coverage every day.

Worth following and supporting!
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(