First, we call for stronger financial privacy protections. The U.S. government has been chipping away at financial privacy for decades with little to no public oversight.
It's time to restore the protections that should have been there all this time.
Next, we turn our attention to stablecoins and CBDCs. While stablecoins offer a promising step forward, CBDCs are clearly a step back.
Congress should work to lessen government regulations inhibiting stablecoins while ensuring that the Fed cannot issue a CBDC.
In the third chapter, we consider cryptocurrencies more generally.
From removing the Infrastructure bill's broker definition to removing capital gains taxes on transactions, there is much Congress can do to level the playing field for cryptocurrency competition.
Next, the guide takes a look at the growing ESG debates ahead of @jenniferjschulp's conference next month.
Investors should be free to invest as they see fit, but neither Congress nor the SEC should be mandating that decision for them.
Shifting to monetary policy, it's long past time to rein in the Fed.
To get started, that means narrowing the mandate, holding the Fed to a credible rule, and shrinking the balance sheet.
Next, we turn to removing barriers for small businesses and investors, alike.
For instance, Congress should remove the barriers keeping average Americans out of the stock market. How much money you have shouldn't be the deciding factor for whether you are "qualified" to invest.
Finally, the guide ends with broader reforms to improve competition across financial markets as a whole.
That includes winding down the GSEs, eliminating duplicative federal regulators, fixing MMF rules, and much more.
That is a lot of ground to cover, but don't fret! The entire policy guide is just 41 pages. Sifting through hundreds and thousands of pages of research is our job, not yours.
With @iampaulgrewal’s latest FOIA requests out, there’s a ton of new information to go through.
The most shocking finding across the letters is still the repeated instructions to “pause” cryptocurrency-related activity. But the problems go deeper.🧵
Again and again, the FDIC told banks “pause all crypto asset-related activity.” For example, in this case, a bank wanted to offer customers the option to transact with bitcoin.
While the FDIC figured out a few different ways to say it, the message was clear: banks might recognize the financial system is changing, but they are not allowed to take part in this change.
Agreed. And this is precisely why @norbertjmichel and I published a new paper calling for both the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to be prohibited from issuing a central bank digital currency, or CBDC.
Proponents claim a CBDC would promote financial inclusion, spur faster payments, protect the dollar's status, and improve monetary policy---all worthy goals.
Yet all four arguments fail to stand up to scrutiny.
Financial inclusion?
Considering privacy and distrust for banks are the two of the top three reasons for being unbanked, it's hard to imagine how a CBDC would remedy the issue when trust in the government is at historic lows.
All eyes are on Jackson Hole, but the real statement of the summer came from @neelkashkari: “I keep asking anybody to explain to me what problem [a CBDC] is solving.” 🧵
I may not always agree with @neelkashkari, but he is absolutely correct when he points out that he can send anyone money with Venmo. You don’t need a CBDC to do that.
But what about financial inclusion or cross border payments? Again, @neelkashkari is right: there is no evidence to suggest it will actually help here.
The UN officially recommends restricting cryptocurrency and providing a CBDC. Here's a quick thread on why this recommendation couldn't be more flawed. 🧵
While I wrote this paper with the U.S. Congress in mind, every country should be looking towards cryptocurrencies for lessons on how to improve their domestic currencies. cato.org/briefing-paper…
Specifically, part of the reason that people want cryptocurrency (all over the world) is due to the financial privacy protections, faster payments, and more transparent monetary policy. Instead of restricting or prohibiting currency competition, governments should learn from it.