The US economy looks very typical late cycle where modest growth at elevated output levels maintains inflation pressures.
Tomorrow’s GDP report will show more of the same, with more balance vs 2Q. Nominal at ~1.3% q/q with real growth at ~0.7% and deflator at ~0.6%. Thread:
Those figures roughly align with what we are seeing in various timely forecasts.
GDP now is running about 3.1% ann. Based upon the already reported PCE deflator and Sept estimate from the Cleveland Fed, quarterly headline inflation is likely to come in around 2.5% ann.
When you scan across the whole economy, many sectors look the same. Moderating real growth at high levels of demand and output. Its important to look at both the growth and levels
Real consumption has slowed to barely positive based on reported data and September retail sales.
But levels of demand are still strong at or above trend.
Production growth is a bit weaker than earlier in the year, running slightly positive.
From levels that are very strong:
Construction is one area slowing more significantly, though it’s a much smaller piece of the overall economic picture.
But even with the slowing that we’ve seen its still at relatively elevated levels overall. Of course residential is expected to contract on a forward looking basis, but as I highlighted previously, its not likely enough to tip the whole economy.
End demand in the US is weaker than what the top line GDP number suggests. Interesting to see inventories still building.
This stocking will not continue forever, but it is beneficial to production in the short term.
Levels of stocking are now well above trend.
The improving trade balance is also a net positive to the reported GDP figure as a bigger share of our demand is being met by domestic production vs. external production.
What's happening under the hood is imports are slowing, while exports sit at around zero growth.
A big part of that is that the big inventory stocking that happened earlier this year which creates a spike in imports has now reversed. Exports look like everything else - slowing growth from high levels.
What we see above is very typical late cycle dynamics. The first step of the slowdown is moderation of growth at high levels of output. Just as we are seeing now.
We've all become accustomed over the last 20 years to crisis driven declines (08 & 20). But those weren't typical.
Economic cycles take years to play out. We are almost a year in and just starting to have reliably softer growth, but still some growth.
Typically its another 9-12 months before employment starts to weaken and inflation comes down sustainably. And then another year or two before employment bottoms.
With all that in mind, it looks like we are still early in this process and this GDP report will confirm that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The ECB is still way behind. Headline inflation is rising at 10% and core at 5%.
This morning's slew of country data confirmed more of the same for October. That paired with GDP growth rates which remain modestly positive suggests that the ECB is unlikely to stop soon.
European core had seen a slight pause late summer, but in recent months it has reaccelerated and its clear that the headline figures are seeping in to the core. October data doesn't help the case.
The 75bps rise yesterday was a step in the right direction. But 2% is well behind the curve in creating tight enough policy to stem the massive inflation surge. Just compare rates today vs. where they were financial crisis.
Hope of a bottom in the stock and bond markets on expectations of a coming pivot.
What matters to a pivot is the *actual data* the Fed is seeing and how they respond to that data. Look at the charts below with a eye unbiased by your positions.
What aligns with a pivot?
Median CPI
Core PCE. Nowcast for September is close to 5.5% annualized.
Most investors today have not experienced a normal recession. It's important to remember that they typically take a *long time.*
A few charts about the 2000s cycle. End to end it took 3 years: the full equity market index peaked in Mar '00. That last bottom was Mar '03.
While growth slowed starting 1Q 2000, it took nearly a year before the unemployment rate started to rise significantly. From there it took another 2 years to finally bottom.
Inflation wasn't a big part of the story, but you can still get a feel of how long it took to play out. Core inflation y/y peaked roughly 2 years after the peak in stocks and slowdown in growth.
So even despite growth being close to zero for years, inflation didn't come down.
PBOC used optimal market conditions to make a big splash this AM. Dollar weakness overnight inspired the MoF to bid JPY, and then seeing the progress, the PBOC came in hard.
Suggests a little more tactical thoughtfulness in policy to make the biggest impact possible.
The MoF action got started before the PBOC. The line is the same time as above. The JPY was already through much of its rally before the PBOC came in.
The underlying move was connected to the broader dollar weakness, which was driven by the bond move, which was driven by weak post-close tech earnings.
But its clear from the market action the big moves came from actions from the PBOC and MoF.
For most investors currencies are a window into the way cross border capital flows impact asset markets.
This week a series of readings about FX and the impacts on asset markets. We all know the dollar is strong, but how did we get here and what are the implications? A thread:
To understand the global FX system today you have to start with Bretton Woods 2.
Starting back in the early 2000s Asian exporters provided cheap goods to the US. Their central banks recycled that income into US bonds to keep their FX competitive.
Looks like an extra shift for folks at the MoF. They stayed late, sold some bonds as US markets opened, and then hit the market with probably 20bln or so to get 4 handles out of it.
A quick scan through the market action around the BoJ intervention:
The pressure on the yen had been building up overnight as US bonds sold off. Though much of the bond selloff reversed before the Japanese intervened.
Possible the MoF was selling bonds just ahead of when they intervened? Would explain the sell-off then reversal market action.
Stocks had rallied as bond yields had fallen. Not much response in US markets from the intervention.