60 years ago today on the 27th October 1962, human life on Earth came the closest it has ever come to a terrible ending. Everyone alive today owes their life to this handsome devil, and most of us don't even know his name. Let's change that - a thread 🧵
First, a little historical context - in October 1962, the Cuban Missile crisis erupted with USSR responding to American missiles in Italy and Turkey by spiriting missiles to Cuba. This stand-off is often considered the most dangerous moment of the cold war: that is not correct..
..for while Khrushchev & Kennedy were engaged in frantic talks to avert disaster, the real drama was playing out deep beneath the Atlantic Ocean, unbeknownst to either leader. Away from Moscow and Washington, a deadly game of cat & mouse had begun with terrible ramifications.
Soviet submarine B- 59 had been detected by the US Navy, diving too deep to communicate with the outside world. Pursued by a US aircraft carrier & 11 destroyers, the B- 59 crew had been unable to contact Moscow for days. No one aboard knew if war had begun nor how to proceed
Attempting to force B-59 to surface, the Americans dropped depth charges, unsurprisingly interpreted as raw aggression. Senior officers on board, Capt Valentin Savitsky, political officer Ivan Maslennikov, & flotilla commander Vasili Arkhipov – gathered to formulate a response
What the Americans could not know is that the beleaguered B-59 had a nuclear arsenal; a T5 nuclear torpedo. Cut-off from Moscow, B- 59 had autonomy to respond to threats and, if required, authority to deploy the nuke. Unaware of this, the Americans continued their pursuit
The atmosphere on B-59 was oppressive. Air con had failed and the cramped enclosure was like an inescapable sauna, with temperatures above 50ºC. Carbon dioxide had risen to dangerously high levels, & oxygen & water were low – not situations conducive to rational decision-making
Depth charges constantly rocked B- 59, "like sitting in a metal barrel with someone hitting it with a sledgehammer". The rattled Savitsky accepted that war had already begun. "We are going to hit them hard. We shall die ourselves, sink them all, but not stain the navy’s honour"
Maslennikov agreed. Normal protocols dictated that a decision to launch required approval of the captain and political officer only. But Arkhipov’s position as flotilla commander gave him equal rank with Savitsky. For B-59 to use its nuclear weapon, all 3 would have to consent
With Savitsky and Maslennikov resolved to fight, the decision to strike now rested entirely upon Arkhipov’s broad shoulders. Upon his word, the Randolph would have been completely vaporised by the nuclear payload, an act that would have certainly triggered a Third World War.
Neither the Kremlin nor the White House knew that this momentous decision was being made. In the words of historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, "this was not only the most dangerous moment of the Cold War. It was the most dangerous moment in human history."
The commander was, however, no stranger to pressure. Only the year before, he served on the K- 19 submarine, when its nuclear reactor coolant system failed. To stave off a nuclear meltdown, Arkhipov & the crew had improvised a secondary coolant system & narrowly averted disaster
This K-19 incident was infamous throughout the Soviet navy, & Arkhipov’s courage was widely known and deeply respected. Now, aboard the sweltering B- 59, all eyes fell upon him. Facing his fellow officers, he resolutely vetoed their request to engage.
A passionate argument ensued, yet his contention remained that launching the T- 5 meant total nuclear war was inevitable. To do so without complete information was the height of madness, he argued; instead, he urged that they surface and re- establish communication with Moscow.
Finally, Arkhipov won his colleagues over. By that stage the White House had become aware of the North Atlantic chase, ordering B-59 be allowed return to the USSR unmolested. It was only much later before either Moscow or Washington realised how close to destruction we had come
This day 60 years ago, the reasoning of Arkhipov prevented Armageddon. Decades later, the director of the National Security Archive, Thomas Blanton, put it succinctly: "a guy called Vasili Arkhipov saved the world". It is no exaggeration to say we owe our very lives to his logic
For some reason, neither Arkhipov nor his fellow country man Stanislaw Petrov (whom I've written about before) are household names, but they really should be: had less reflective people been in charge, none of us would have survived; a sobering thought
Now, with Putin's nuclear threats, we might be forgiven for a sense of déjà vu. I only hope that if history strives to repeat itself, that new heroes of reason like Arkhipov and Petrov arise to ensure that critical thought never becomes afterthought. This, we can only hope
Anyway, thanks for reading - these stories are to me an illustration of just how vital critical thinking is, & for that reason I opened with them in my book "The Irrational Ape", on and why we get things so dangerously wrong: you can check it out here: tinyurl.com/2s39vu3y
...and just to clarify as I'm asked a lot, if you're in North America, it's got a different title, "Good Thinking", and new content too. Hope you enjoy!
amazon.com/Good-Thinking-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr David Robert Grimes

Dr David Robert Grimes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drg1985

Sep 7
In less than 24 hours, a thread offering tips to avoid / fight cancer 'naturally' (mainly through diet⛳️) has gotten over 100k likes.

Sadly, the advice given is both wrong and dangerous, and *very* likely to cause harm.

A quick thread on why this is so misguided... 🧵
First ⛳️: stem cell quackery. No, you cannot boost stem cells with diet & nor would it likely be beneficial to do so (cancer stem cells are a thing too, btw) - this paper by @CaulfieldTim shows such claims are common, but utter nonsense futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/rm…
Second ⛳️: no, you cannot hack your DNA, and anyone who thinks you can doesn't understand DNA. DNA repair is a complex process, but you have NOTHING to do with it. It evolved millions of years before humans even existed; eating mangos isn't going to change any of that...
Read 16 tweets
Sep 2
Remember the preprint that claimed COVID vaccines caused significant adverse effects, beloved by contrarians? Well it's now been published in an @ElsevierConnect journal - it *really* shouldn't have been, as it remains hot flaming garbage. Here's why...

STRAP IN, IT'S GRIM.. 🧵
..so the authors basically took safety data from Pfizer and Moderna, and ran a post-hoc and totally arbitrary analysis on it. And lo and behold, they claimed to find harms. Only problem? It was complete tosh, as @JHowardBrainMD explained at the time.. sciencebasedmedicine.org/dont-do-this/
..In the most basic sense, the authors shuffled around data until they got the seeming illusion of a result that fringe figures loved. But this was utter bunk; firstly, every comparison you run increases the chance of a spurious findings. As a famous economist once said...
Read 9 tweets
Aug 18
Anti-vaccine (& more broadly, fringe science) harassment is unrelenting. I've lost count of incidents where cranks have threatened me, bombarded my universities with complaints, written slanderous blogs, & tried hard to make life miserable. Fully understand why people step back..
...my experiences aren't unique btw; this happens to *everyone* speaking publicly for vaccination. Nor is this a COVID thing specifically - folks like @gorskon getting it in neck for 20+ years, & first time I had to go to cops with credible threat was 2014. This is MO of fringe..
..it's not just vaccination either: other fringe movements can be even more aggressive. In all cases, they use the same tactics to intimidate. We wrote about these tactics before for the curious:

bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e…
Read 4 tweets
May 26
THREAD 🧵: Throughout pandemic, some scientists gained huge followings by making extreme, scary claims from limited data.

Some justify this, arguing exaggeration / hyperbole makes people do the "right thing".

I think this is morally & scientifically reprehensible. Here's why..
Firstly, it's utterly antithetical to communicating science.

Unjustified extrapolation, neglecting of caveats & limitations, & making statements beyond the confidence of the data really not conducive to public understanding of medical science.

Great for clout, though 🙄
.. it also sets up pointless false binaries. Just as sure as some scientists overstate things, another cohort garner huge audiences by understating or dismissing risks.

When they're both deliberately misleading for their cause, it massively undermines any moral argument too
Read 8 tweets
Apr 3
I've said this before, but really depressing to witness the many scientists, doctors and academics gleefully contributing to a culture of misinformation during a pandemic, weaponising their social media feeds to push fringe or unsupported narratives to huge audiences..
..had you asked me years ago if we needed more scientists and doctors talking to the public, I would have enthused a yes, because I foolishly presumed they would be bound by professional ethics to stick to evidence-based arguments. I really could not have been more wrong ..
There are qualified individuals doing incredible (often unpaid) work to try and counter misinformation. But it is absolutely drowned out by those who took contrarian or populist stances with faux certainty, garnering them far more traction than actually respecting the evidence.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
A few days ago @boucherhayes had a fascinating thread about how Russian propaganda outfit RT tried to co-opt his work to sow the seeds of discord, well worth reading here. I have my own little RT story I thought I'd share too.. 🧵
Way back in 2016, I had a bit of work on why scientific conspiracy theories incredibly unlikely to succeed. It got a press release by @UniofOxford, and media interest worldwide (must have been a slow news week). So media enquiries start rolling in....
bbc.com/news/science-e…
Lots of journalists excited about using it to "prove" stuff on JFK assassination or similar, so I have to politely point out it's JUST on why scientific conspiracies are unlikely to thrive (especially on vaccination, obviously lab-leak people didn't get memo). Then RT email..
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(