As the Reagan-Udall Foundation undertakes its much-needed review of rampant dysfunction at FDA, the agency’s personnel are speaking out – and whey they have to say is shocking. Let’s take a look.
THREAD 🚨🔎
Using the comment portal that RUF set up, FDA personnel describe a broken culture, corrupt political influence, rigged processes, and retribution for anyone that tries to repair it. Their identities have been shielded.
There are courageous whistleblowers here from a variety of offices within FDA, all describing a broad pattern of unethical misconduct at the agency. Here are some of the highlights.
Ignoring the science and rigging the outcomes:
Dr. Califf postures as a champion of inclusion and diversity. But in reality:
And if the scientific review doesn’t comport with the preconceived outcome that FDA leaders want, they just replace the reviewer:
Naturally, this leads to infighting and jockeying among the people who are supposed to be doing objective analysis:
Corrupt political influence infects that entire process. This is truly outrageous and further confirmation of the complaints we have lodged with HHS Inspector General and the Senate Ethics Committee.
Scientific personnel are being actively and routinely intimidated.
Those personnel wish to do the right thing but the agency prevents them.
They know they system is rigged but there’s nothing they can do.
They also know the agency’s corrupt approach is causing active public health harm but, again, no one will listen to them.
They are proposing fixes to the system but FDA leadership doesn’t care.
Yep.
Those who have tried to speak out internally are swiftly penalized or have their careers derailed.
Leadership at FDA has violated their duty to the American public. This is the appalling culture that Mitch Zeller, Brian King, and Robert Califf have created:
Of course, those personnel are forbidden from dialogue with actual stakeholders. Memo to FDA: you can’t catch Covid over Zoom.
I guess when Senator Durbin or Matt Myers calls the head honcho with their latest demands, ya gotta hop to it.
Infuriating.
What happens when the reviewers concur with an application?
Here’s another and read it closely. Because of political pressure, FDA leadership is *altering* the scientific findings of its own staff and reversing their decisions.
Those personnel also point out that FDA is doing most of this in the absence of formal rulemaking – that is to say, unlawfully. Again, political pressure preventing that.
This deserves to be a major scandal and FDA leadership ought to be truly ashamed. It’s a total disgrace. But the FDA beat writers in the national press have done next to nothing to expose this corruption.
Why is it left to vaping advocates like us to bring this story to light? Why haven’t reporters at NYT, AP, WashPost, CBS, or Reuters tried to cultivate these sources and tell the American public what’s really going on inside that broken agency?
We know why NPR, STAT, TBIJ, and Bloomberg haven’t done it – it’s because they are on the prohibition payroll, taking outright cash payments from billionaires that are engineering the political influence. They condone this corruption and they sold out the public.
These whistleblowers are obviously keen to share their stories and their insight – but apparently no one in the national news media wants to hear it. Those outlets quote unnamed officials at federal agencies all the time. But here? No curiosity, zero effort.
Some people say AVM has been too tough on FDA. But does it still seem “hyperbolic” when we say the agency is rigging the process and is riddled with political influence? Even the agency’s own people can’t engage in a meaningful, constructive dialogue with their own colleagues!
Let’s wrap by applauding the integrity and courage of these FDA staff members. It takes real guts to speak out like this and here’s hoping they continue to stand tall.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s talk about how Bloomberg-backed Vital Strategies @VitalStrat bankrolls reporting at “nonprofit” journalism outlets to further the anti-vaping narrative and provide fodder for prohibitionist campaigns. THREAD 🪡
Vital Strategies funnels huge cash to two nonprofit journalism outlets - The Bureau of Investigative Journalism and The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Here’s Vital boasting about these projects on its website:
TBIJ and OCCRP’s nonprofit status is key. Here you can see TBIJ’s list of supporters and the various topics they fund from environmental issues and big tech to global health and, of course, tobacco control.
🚨🔎🚨
Earlier today, @CDCTobaccoFree held a zoom call to coordinate the spin on its latest youth vaping data with its prohibition cronies like the Potemkin parents and TFK. AVM obtained the link and so did a number of other *unapproved* stakeholders. Let's have a look.
THREAD 🪡
CDC Press Officer Robin Scala quickly realized there were parties on the zoom from outside the Bloomberg/Gates-bankrolled chorus and she insisted we all disconnect. We did not. Bloomberg’s minions were not happy.
When the discussion portion began, Reason Foundation's @gbentley1 took CDC’s deceitful pitch about an “epidemic” and sent it into the upper deck with one simple question. Here is the video we obtained.
🔥👀🔥
We need to talk about @NPR for a minute. For many months we have been trying to engage with reporters and @NPRpubliceditor over a long pattern of erroneous and slanted coverage on vaping policy – and have been stonewalled.
🧵THREAD
It’s important because NPR is a top outlet, reaching millions of Americans. Listeners trust them because NPR promises high standards. It’s even one of the very few media organizations that still has an ombudsman, Kelly McBride, from the media ethics center Poynter Institute.
But NPR’s journalism on vaping has been consistently slanted and shot through with inaccuracies. It has erroneously hyped panics like EVALI, relied on discredited academics, touted hypothetical harms, all while disregarding vaping’s crucial role in helping adults quit smoking.
💥⚖️💥
In his fantastic talk at #GTNF2022, esteemed legal scholar @jadler1969 takes on the FDA’s many failings on vaping policy. Let’s look at some highlights. 🪡
First up, he talks about the agency’s fumbling of the PMTA process:
Adler also provides the receipts on how the FDA and CDC’s negligent messaging directly contributed to dangerous misperceptions about vaping – which started *before* the EVALI screw up:
It’s not surprising the public has been misled about the benefits of vaping. That’s because, as Adler points out, the FDA completely forbids companies from talking about how vaping is safer than combustible cigarettes.
🥊💥🥊
Let’s look at a few epic highlights from @Clive_Bates at the Global Tobacco & Nicotine Forum #GTNF last week.
He was crushing it. First up, it takes courage and integrity to confront the prohibition juggernaut.
Americans count on the press to scrutinize powerful, entrenched actors. That ain’t what’s happening. “The media has been utterly pathetic at investigating this and holding them to account."
On FDA’s ulterior motives and perverse incentives.
Let’s talk about @FDAtobacco Brian King's discontent with facing public criticism. During his cursory remarks and abrupt departure at #GTNF today, King complained that “it’s very easy to be an armchair regulator from the luxury of a social media handle.” THREAD 🪡
Sir, you are a public official. You work for the taxpayers, and you are accountable to American citizens. We have every right to direct questions and critique your way and you have an ethical obligation to explain yourself.
What’s more, any discomfort that either you or your boss, Dr. Califf, may experience on Twitter pales in comparison to the devastating economic and public health consequences that are ongoing from your misguided policies on vaping.