Overall mortality in the UK in 2020, adjusted for the increase and age of the population, was the twelfth lowest since records began in 1942. The last time the mortality rate was this high was 2008. So how did the Government turn this into a civilisation-threatening ‘pandemic’? Image
The answer is by changes to: 1) disease taxonomy, 2) the criteria for attributing a death to COVID-19, 3) identifying the underlying cause of death, 4) identifying infection with SARS-CoV-2, and 5) identifying the clinical presence of COVID-19.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2020/05/01/man…
Given these changes, how do we establish how many people actually died of COVID-19 in the UK in 2020, or, to the contrary, how many deaths from cancer, heart disease, dementia, diabetes, influenza and the other primary causes of death were incorrectly attributed to COVID-19 ?
NHS record show that, by 20 January 2021, 11 months into the ‘pandemic’, 61,414 of the 64,111 deaths in England attributed to COVID-19, 95% of the total, had at least one pre-existing health condition. Of the 2,697 deaths that hadn’t, just 486 were under 60 years of age. Image
Of those with at least one health condition, 26% had diabetes, 17% has dementia, 17% had kidney disease, 16% had pulmonary disease, 13% had heart disease, and 72% had some other health condition. But under changes to certification, all these deaths were attributed to COVID-19. Image
In addition to this systemic misdiagnosis, there are the reports of organisations monitoring health and mortality in the UK, which predict and record the deaths not attributed to COVID-19 resulting from the withdrawal of medical diagnosis, treatment and care under lockdown.
In March 2020, the NHS freed up 30,000 hospital beds for general and acute care, postponed all non-urgent operations, and discharged all hospital inpatients medically fit to leave. This resulted in up to 25,000 hospital patients being sent into care homes. england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp…
In April 2020, NHS England reported a total of 916,581 attendances at A&E that month, compared with 2,112,165 in the same month the previous year, a reduction of 57%; and 326,581 emergency admissions, compared with 535,226 in 2019, a reduction of 39%.
england.nhs.uk/statistics/sta…
In June 2020, a survey of 128 care homes by the Alzheimer’s Society revealed that 79% reported a lack of social contact was causing a deterioration in the health and well-being of residents with dementia, and 75% reported GPs had been reluctant to visit.
theguardian.com/world/2020/jun…
In July 2020, the ONS reported 16,000 excess deaths in March-April not attributed to COVID-19 resulting from changes to emergency and social care under lockdown. It estimated a further 26,000 excess deaths in 2020, and 1,400 deaths from withdrawn care.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The same month, July 2020, the Nursing Times reported that, between March and May, deaths from diabetes at home and in care homes had risen by 47%.
nursingtimes.net/news/diabetes/…
In August 2020, the Institute of Cancer Research reported that a delay of 3 months across all 94,912 patients who were due to have surgery to remove their cancer over the course of the year would lead to an additional 4,755 deaths.
annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-…
In September 2020, Cancer Research UK reported that, in 6 months of lockdown, cancer screening was cancelled for 3.2 million people. From April-August, 350,000 fewer people than normal in the UK were referred with suspected cancer symptoms.
news.cancerresearchuk.org/2020/09/11/wha…
In October 2020, the ONS reported that, between March and September, there were 2,095 excess deaths at home from dementia and Alzheimer’s disease above the 5-year average for England and Wales, an increase of 79.3%.
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
Also in October, the British Heart Foundation reported that, between March and September 2020, there were 26,000 excess deaths in private homes, representing an increase of 25.9% in deaths from heart disease in England and of 22.7% in Wales.
bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/new…
In November 2020, the BMJ reported that even a month’s delay in cancer surgery increases the risk of death by 6-13% across all common forms of cancer, with a 3-month delay increasing the risk by approximately 25%, rising to 44% for some treatments.
bmj.com/content/371/bm…
In December 2020, the NHS reported that, in the 10 months since March, attendances at A&E in hospitals in England were down by 6,887,183 from the same 10 months in 2019, a 32% reduction; and admissions to A&E were down by 1,052,807, a 20% reduction.
england.nhs.uk/statistics/sta…
In January 2021, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reported that, during the first UK lockdown, daily hospital admissions for heart attack and failure decreased by 54%, with a correlation between lockdown and reduction in medical care. jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.…
In January 2021, the ONS published ‘Deaths registered by place of occurrence’, in which it records, in the accompanying dataset, deaths between 7 March, 2020 (week 11 of the year) and 1 January, 2021 (week 53).
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
This recorded 40,114 excess deaths occurring at home in the last 43 weeks of 2020, only 3,881 of which were attributed to COVID-19. There were also 26,202 excess deaths in care homes, 20,574 of which were swept under the COVID-19 carpet. That’s 41,861 unaccounted excess deaths. Image
In January 2021, the ONS published ‘Provisional leading causes of death for 2020’, showing the age-standardised mortality rate for leading causes of death in England between 1 January-31 December 2020, compared to the 5-year average between 2015 and 2019. ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
Unsurprisingly, in a year in which 25,000 patients were evicted from hospital into care homes in which 70% of residents have dementia, yet were denied medical care and family visits under lockdown, deaths from these diseases were 4,132 above the 5-year average of 61,928 deaths. Image
Yet, incredibly, in a year in which cancer screening was cancelled for 3.2 million people in the 6 months up to September 2020, and surgery for 94,912 patients was postponed or cancelled, deaths from lung and throat cancer were down 1,537 from the 5-year average of 28,108 deaths.
Just as incredibly, although the British Heart Foundation reported that, from March-September 2020, deaths at home from heart disease were up 25.9% in England due to lockdown restrictions, deaths from heart disease in 2020 were 1,450 below the 5-year average of 53,429 deaths.
More incredibly, deaths from chronic lower respiratory diseases were down by 2,764 from the 5-year average of 29,681, a 9% reduction. And even more incredibly, deaths from cerebrovascular diseases were down by 2,263 deaths from the 5-year average of 29,943, a fall of 13.2%.
Most incredibly of all, there were 7,313 fewer deaths from influenza and pneumonia in 2020 than the 5-year average of 25,969 deaths, a 28% reduction. These figures are not credible as accurate records of the effects of withdrawing healthcare to 60 million people for 10 months.
Given the criteria for attributing a death to COVID-19, what is credible is that these thousands of ‘lost’ deaths, and the thousands more caused by lockdown, have been misdiagnosed and incorrectly recorded as ‘COVID-deaths’. But how do we corroborate this thesis with facts?
On 14 January, Public Health England (PHE) published its analysis of deaths between 21 March, 2020 and 1 January, 2021. These show 7,511 excess deaths in which other health conditions were listed recorded as ‘COVID-19 deaths’. fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports…
Deaths from causes other than COVID-19 numbered 11,013 over the 5-year average; yet 5,057 of these were listed as ‘COVID-deaths’. Even when deaths from the underlying cause were below the 5-year average, 2,454 deaths were still registered as ‘COVID-19 deaths’. Image
75% of excess deaths in which the underlying cause was dementia were recorded as COVID-19 deaths; 41% from urinary diseases; 40% from cerebrovascular diseases; 41% from other circulatory diseases; 33% from heart diseases; 31% from liver diseases, and 50% from all other causes. Image
If COVID-19 had been listed as the ‘underlying cause’ on any of these death certificates, they would all have been recorded as COVID-19 deaths. What these figures don’t show is how many deaths from these diseases not in excess of the 5-year average were attributed to COVID-19.
However, PHE additionally revealed that, between 21 March, 2020 and 1 January, 2021, there were 18,851 excess deaths in England in which diabetes was mentioned on the death certificate, of which 15,589 were recorded as COVID-19 deaths, nearly 83% of the total. Image
There were also 22,081 excess deaths attributed to COVID-19 in which dementia and Alzheimer’s disease were mentioned on the death certificate. That’s the more than the 20,574 deaths in care homes that were attributed to COVID-19 on nothing more than the suspicion of the managers. Image
Finally, there were an astonishing 35,133 excess deaths attributed to COVID-19 in which acute respiratory infections were mentioned on the death certificate. If you’re wondering, as many people have been, where all the deaths from flu disappeared to in 2020, here’s your answer. Image
The 76,065 excess deaths in which 1 of these 3 diseases appeared on the death certificate equal the 76,553 deaths in England attributed to COVID-19 in 2020. So why, given the fatality of these conditions in other years, was COVID-19 recorded as the cause in so many in 2020?
The most logical answer is the changes to disease taxonomy, protocol on completing death certificates, criteria for attributing a death to COVID-19, the false positives produced by the RT-PCR testing programme, and the equation of such a positives with symptoms of COVID-19.
It’s not possible for deaths consequent upon changes to the NHS in 2020 not to show up in the overall mortality. Yet if we deduct the 81,653 deaths attributed to COVID-19 from the 608,002 deaths in 2020, we’re left with 526,349 deaths from all other causes.blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/01/12/cou…
That’s 12,734 fewer than the previous 5-year average of 539,083 deaths, when mortality rates between 2015 and 2019 were at historically low levels. ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
Even with nearly 5 million fewer diagnoses for cancer, withdrawn medical care and treatment, delayed and cancelled operations, 8,000 fewer hospital beds for general and acute care due to social distancing, the medical staff quarantined on the basis of false positives . . .
7 million people too terrorised to attend hospital, more than 1 million people who didn’t receive emergency care, and the assault on the physical and mental health of the population, the number of deaths in 2020 other than those attributed to COVID-19 were lower than since 2016.
So where have all those excess deaths gone? Again, the only answer that makes sense of these otherwise inexplicable figures is that they have been misdiagnosed or inaccurately recorded as COVID-19 deaths, and that the only epidemic we suffered in 2020 was an epidemic of tests.
Between 21 March 2020 and 1 January 2021 there were 376,668 deaths in England attributed to causes other than COVID-19. If even 20% of them were misdiagnosed as COVID-19, the 76,553 deaths in England officially attributed to COVID-19 last year would vanish.
84% of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 2020, over 68,000 deceased, were of people aged 70 years and over. 61% were aged 80 years and over, the average life expectancy in the UK. 90% had at least one pre-existing health condition, with most having two.
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
To put these figures into context, in 2020 there were 9,189,000 people 70 years of age or over in the UK, and 412,408 of them, 4.48%, died of causes not attributed to COVID-19. 0.7% of them officially died of COVID-19.
statista.com/statistics/749…
It wouldn’t take much to push a population of such elderly and frail people into a life-threatening situation. Deny them human contact on pain of arrest and fines. Withdraw medical treatment. Quarantine their carers. Terrorise them with propaganda about a killer disease.
Order them to stay at home and avoid contact with other people like the plague. Tell them hospitals standing empty are being overwhelmed. Turn medical centres into places to fear, the breeding grounds of a deadly new disease. That should be enough. It was more than enough.
Then change the medical protocol and criteria for identifying and recording the cause of death, and use a medically meaningless test to turn traces of a virus amplified over a trillion times into proof of infection and cause of death. This is how the ‘pandemic’ was manufactured.
What these figures show is that lockdown restrictions, far from halting the spread of a respiratory virus, were responsible for a huge percentage of the excess deaths in 2020 that pushed the mortality rate higher than it had been for a dozen years.
The evidence indicates that at least half the 80,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 2020 were caused by lockdown restrictions. But that’s a conservative estimate, and doesn’t include the more than 20,000 excess deaths in care homes swept under the COVID-19 carpet.
If you’d like to read about this evidene in greater detail, this is the article from which this information is taken, which I published in January 2021.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/01/27/lie…
And if you’re asking yourself, as so many are, why the UK state went to such lengths to manufacture a threat to public health that never existed and in doing so killed tens of thousands of UK citizens, you may be interested in my book, The Road to Fascism.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2022/09/28/the…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Architects for Social Housing

Architects for Social Housing Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonElmer2022

Oct 27
What do you call a government whose leader wasn’t elected by party or electorate, was installed after its predecessor was disapproved by the financial sector, is implementing programmes for which it has no mandate, and which will give it totalitarian control over the population?
The Global Biosecurity state under construction draws much of its governance (technocratic rule), juridical procedures (a permanent state of emergency), ideology (biosecurity) and political economy (merger of government authority and corporate monopoly) from historical fascism.
Fascism is not only a form of governance, a configuration of state or a social contract, but how these are imposed on a population; and the programmes being imposed on the justification of manufactured health, environmental and energy ‘crises’ will fundamentally change all three.
Read 16 tweets
Oct 24
To the unelected Prime Minister, the UK People do not recognise this Government as of, by and for the People. We are therefore dissolving Parliament. All existing parties are now categorised as terrorist organisations, and all sitting MPs are banned from holding office again.
Among the many and disastrous acts or failures to act committed by this Parliament and its three governments over the two-and-a-half years since the ‘pandemic’ was declared by the World Health Organization in March 2020, are the following:
1. Authorising the Bank of England to create a £895 billion quantitative easing programme in March 2020, and the Government to spend £410 billion on lockdown, both causing the spiralling inflation that is predicted to reach 18% in 2023, the highest since the 1970s.
Read 15 tweets
Oct 21
TWENTY-FOUR REASONS NOT TO TAKE A COVID-19 ‘VACCINE’; or, every argument that starts with the terror of a crisis and then uses it to justify coercive action does so in order to circumvent critical thinking and terrorise the public into unthinking compliance.
1. YOU DON’T NEED THEM. Unless you’re over 69 or have a health condition, you don’t need even one that works, with SARS-CoV-2 having a median infection fatality rate of 0.501% at 60-69, 0.129% at 50-59, 0.035% at 40-49, 0.011% at 30-39, 0.003% at 20-29, and 0.0003% at 0-19.
2. THEY DON’T PROTECT YOU. The claims they offer 95% protection are false, being based on inaccurate and manipulated figures on relative risk reduction taken from inadequate clinical trials. The absolute risk reduction across the whole population is between 0.84% and 1.3%.
Read 26 tweets
Oct 20
The political theorist, Hannah Arendt, argued that, in totalitarian societies, the police forces have greater power than the armed forces. Since March 2020, the powers of surveillance and arrest of the police in the UK have hugely increased on the justification of protecting us.
On 10 February 2020, the Health Protection (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 empowered the police to detain, isolate and take a biological sample from us on the grounds that we ‘may be’ infected with SARS-CoV-2, in the enforcement of which an officer may ‘use reasonable force’.
On 25 March 2020, the Coronavirus Act 2020 empowered the police to use whatever force is necessary to cover our faces with a mask, remove us to a place of detention, take a biological sample without our permission and impose restrictions on our movements and actions for 14 days.
Read 30 tweets
Oct 19
The accusation of ‘conspiracy theory’ is the blanket with which we comfort ourselves that the governments we elect are in power, that voting for them gives us political agency, and that transnational organisations are accountable to us. Below are some well-known ‘conspiracies’.
The Bank for International Settlements, founded in 1930, with a membership of 61 central banks in 2022. Currently implementing Central Bank Digital Currency programmable with restrictions on expenditure contingent upon our health status, carbon footprint and social compliance.
The United Nations, founded in 1945, with 193 member-states in 2022. Currently implementing Sustainable Development Goals that allocate capital, investment and other preferential treatment to governments and corporations according to their compliance with ESG criteria.
Read 20 tweets
Oct 18
The Great Reset of the global economy and the Global Biosecurity State constructed on its ruins will only succeed with our compliance or indifference. Below is an A-Z list of the more than 1,100 companies, banks and institutions that have partnered with the World Economic Forum.
Together, these businesses form the ‘COVID-19 Action Platform’, a coalition of the world’s most powerful businesses that was launched on 11 March 2020, the same day the World Health Organization declared SARS-CoV-2 to be a ‘pandemic’.
weforum.org/agenda/2020/03…
This Platform is the prototype for what the World Economic Forum calls ‘stakeholder capitalism’, by which national governments are replaced as the final arbiters of state policies by international corporations to create a new form of global governance and economic management.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(