The fragrance of sandalwood: A history of the Mysore Sandal Soap
How Sri Krishnaraja Wadiyar IV and his Dewan, Sir M. Visvesvaraya, established the century-old legacy of this soap brand, which was later elevated to new heights by Sosale Garalapuri Shastry.
It all began somewhere in May 1916, during the First World War. At the time, Mysore was the world's largest producer of sandalwood.
Mysore would export the majority of sandalwood to Europe. But, due to the chaos of the world war, the city could not export the sandalwood.
In 1918, the Maharaja received a rare set of sandalwood oil soaps. This inspired him to produce similar soaps for the public.
To take things further, he asked Sir Visvesvaraya to make arrangements for soap-making experiments at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc).
There, he discovered the brilliant chemist Sosale Garalapuri Shastry and sent him to England to hone his soap-making skills.
The diligent scientist, fondly remembered by many as Soap Shastry, was instrumental in realizing Visveswaraya's dream.
The first government soap factory was set up near K R Circle in Bengaluru to manufacture sandal soap. In 1918, this technique of using sandalwood oil for making soaps was standardized.
In the same year, another factory for distilling oil from sandalwood was set up in Mysore.
Sosale Garalapuri Shastry worked on the soap's culturally significant packaging as well.
As the logo for the factory, he chose Sharaba, a legendary creature with the body of a lion and the head of an elephant.
The cover also had a special message, ‘Srigandhada Tavarininda’ ( from the maternal home of sandalwood’) printed on all the soapboxes.
In addition, he designed a rectangular container with floral patterns and distinct hues. This container resembled a jewelry box.
In 2006, the soap received a Geographical Indicator (GI) label, which means that only KSDL soap has the right to call itself "Mysore Sandalwood" soap.
If Boroline is a Bengali’s best friend, the Mysore sandal soap is definitely an integral part of a Kannadiga’s identity.
Due to this near-monopolistic presence in the market for sandalwood bathing soaps, KSDL has also become one of Karnataka’s few public-sector enterprises that turns consistent profits.
In fact, the company registered its highest gross sales turnover (of ₹476 crore) in 2015-16.
The company has also successfully branched out into other soaps, incense sticks, essential oils, hand washes, and talcum powder, etc.
Nonetheless, the Mysore Sandal Soap remains the company’s flagship product, the only soap in the world made from 100% pure sandalwood oil.
References:
(i) History Of Mysore Sandal Soap by Gijo Vijayan
(ii) Mysore Sandal Soap: A Maharaja’s Gift ~ Live History India
(iii) This sandalwood soap traces its origins back to WW1 (The Print)
(iv) The Fascinating History of Mysore Sandal Soap ~ The Better India
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
He argues that the Indian state has made the annihilation of caste structurally impossible by absorbing caste into its constitutional and bureaucratic logic instead of dismantling it.
He starts with Ambedkar’s 1951 resignation letter.
Ambedkar warned that reservations for backward classes were being shaped by political expediency, not justice. He feared the state was turning caste into a permanent administrative category with no clear end point.
What Ambedkar envisioned as a radical project of ending caste slowly morphed into a project of managing caste.
The language of “social and educational backwardness” recast caste as a legitimate basis for state action.
What if Indian academia is not producing knowledge but staging its simulation?
Vivek Dhareshwar calls it intellectual parasitism. A condition where concepts are consumed without being metabolized.
A thread on his radical vision for a new humanities. 🧵
Intellectual parasitism is not mimicry. It is dispossession.
It is when Foucault, Derrida, Butler are recited like mantras, their concepts floating free of the historical and social wounds that made them necessary.
Theory becomes a fetish. Thinking stops.
In this regime, the classroom is not a site of encounter. It is a theatre of citation.
Learning becomes procedural. Texts are mastered but not suffered. Concepts are deployed but never ruptured. Knowledge circulates without consequence.
How did the British and missionaries react to bare-chested women in South India? A story of colonial morality, caste, and cultural erasure that still shapes our thinking on dress and modesty today.
A thread 👇
A company painting of a basket maker and his wife, late 18th century.
In pre-colonial South India, women—across many castes—often went bare-chested. This was not seen as shameful. It was part of local aesthetics, climate, and caste codes. Modesty had a different meaning.
Enter the British and Christian missionaries with their Victorian morality, which equated nudity or partial nudity with "barbarism" or "backwardness".
The bare-chested woman became, to them, a symbol of India’s moral decay.
"The construction of a mosque on a spot regarded as sacred by the conquered population was meant as an insult… an insult to an ancient idea, the idea of Ram.”
"A convert’s deepest impulse is the rejection of his origins.”
In an interview published in Outlook magazine, Naipaul had said;
"You say that Hindu militancy is dangerous. Dangerous or not, it is a necessary corrective to the history I have been talking about. It is a creative force and it will prove to be so."
"So in India at the moment, you have a million mutinies - every man is a mutiny on his own - and I find that entirely creative. It's difficult to manage, it gets very messy, but it is the only way forward."