To those still wondering perhaps why I keep on about the startling differences between the House/McCaul and Senate/Burr #OriginsofCovid report, I'm going to outline what I find to be the most glaring omissions.
First, the title. That should say enough but lets keep going.
Feel free to follow along as we go over this document together. These are not my opinions or findings, I just believe fair and open analysis of this document is imperative to our understanding of the Origins of COVID-19. It warrants consideration.
"It is beyond doubt that the CCP actively engaged in a cover-up designed to obfuscate data, hide relevant public health information, and suppress doctors and journalists who attempted to warn the world."
Burr & Co. report doesnt mention any CCP involvement.
Burr report also conveniently leaves out all mention of Dr l. Zheng-Li Shi and Dr. Ralph Baric. Curious that such an investigation would leave out any mention of one of the world's top domain experts on Coronaviruses or UNC's work with WIV, NIAID, et al.
SENATE REPORT from Burr & Co also fail to address key pertinent questions to the CCP.
Burr & @GOPHELP report also fails to address or ask these pertinent questions that the House / McCaul recommends to be addressed to the World Health Organization. These absolutely should have been addressed by Burr. The world deserves an answer to them.
In the addendum to the House/McCaul report it includes further evidence of how top scientists at the WIV and Dr. Peter Daszak, an American scientist, furthered the cover-up by the CCP and the WHO.
It requires further investigation but at the very least fair analysis by Burr!
"We conclude there is ample proof that the virus could have been genetically manipulated, and that it is vitally important we fully investigate this hypothesis to determine if that happened here."
Senate report: *crickets*
House report: 🔥🔥🔥
Another big difference is that Senate / Burr report leaves out the recommendation that Peter Daszak testify before Congress and that there be a ban on funding or conducting gain of function research. This is a serious and urgent matter that Burr and Co fail to address.
Burr report also fails to mention very crucial discoveries that not only demonstrate that the virus leaked from WIV but that the 2019 International Military Sports Council Military World Games event in hosted that year in Wuhan was the first super spreader event.
Burr report fails to disclose the evidence of genetic manipulation and gain of function research in the years leading up to the pandemic as well as the extensive funding from NIH and NIAID to institutions like UNC, EHA and WIV to conduct this research.
Burr report conveniently leaves out key evidence of a lab leak cover up at Wuhan. This would be public record and open source information that is available, why would Burr leave this information out? Maybe to ease tensions with China? Or to also assist in covering up for them?
Burr report also leaves out that Peter Daszak was the only representative of the United States on the WHO-
China Joint Study team in early 2021 and that the United States put forth a list of experts to be considered,
none of whom were chosen. Daszak was not on that list.
"..based on the preponderance of available information; the documented efforts to obfuscate, hide, and destroy evidence; lack of physical evidence to the contrary; that SCov2 was accidentally released from a WIV lab sometime prior to September 12, 2019."
Burr didnt get the memo?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The complaint reiterates many times that it is about Daszak's behavior and conduct, withholding information, shielding COI's, non compliance to formal inquiries into the use or potential misuse of taxpayer funds..actions that cleart violate NAM & NASEM policies.
See below.
Cohen continues, "Science obtained an email—from someone who had no connection to the investigation—that explained the decision to members."
What we need explained is whether NAM properly investigated the complaints, or did NAM disregard the complaints for political reasons?
If you want to understand more about why Bill Gates pushes so hard for vaccines and appears front and center in official media discourse about vaccines, it's important to read the CEPI preliminary business plan (2017-2021) presentation to the WHO.
“CEPI is the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. It was officially unveiled in early 2017 by Bill Gates, along with cofounder Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The giant philanthropic health fund, Wellcome Trust, was also among the original founders.”
"In the CEPI plan, which WHO adopted, Bill Gates manages vaccine production and profits from the pandemic while WHO manages the medical & scientific community. WHO’s role became managing the pandemic in the interest of the CCP and Bill Gates, two of the largest donors to WHO.”
Senate Minority Staff Oversight's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee led by @SenatorBurr re: #OriginsOfCovid report was released today. I have seen a lot of discussion about this so I thought I'd chime in on what I find very odd.
The Burr report states, "The objective was to review publicly available, open-source information to examine the two prevailing theories of origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.."
However, there was one very important document that Burr & Co failed to review, cite or even mention. Why?
The Burr report's conclusion references: the WHO Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens, the COVID- 19 Lancet Commission, and the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence 90-Day Assessment on the COVID-19 Origins.
From the very beginning of this Pandemic, I have heard pundits, politicians & other public health officials speak about "winning hearts and minds" when talking about vaccine acceptance strategies. Pacification is the more formal term for winning hearts and minds. How ironic.
🧵
Using nudge theory strategies to steer the behaviors of an entire population is not how to win over anyone's heart or mind. That is called brainwashing or the more accepted term - behavioral modification or control.
When you have a federally funded institution openly admitting to utilizing behavioral control techniques through social "nudging" with the intent of "ESTABLISHING COVID-19 VACCINATION AS AN ACCEPTED SOCIAL NORM" that is behavioral modification en masse.
@HouseForeign compiled a fascinating & well researched report on the #OriginsOfCovid that raise a lot of questions about EcoHealth Alliance, Daszak, NIH & WIV. I'll stay impartial but I'm curious why there's not enough oversight or inquiry into this.
RE: @HouseForeign : "we now believe it’s time to completely dismiss the wet market as the source of the outbreak. We also believe the preponderance of the evidence proves the virus did leak from the WIV and that it did so sometime before September 12, 2019."
"We have uncovered evidence of how top scientists at the WIV and Dr. Peter Daszak furthered that cover-up. Their actions include bullying scientists who questioned whether the virus could have leaked from a lab;.."