An overly-long and still non-comprehensive reading list for understanding #NIRS#muscleoxygenation in sport science! š§µ
1/15
Start with this concise opinion piece from Perrey on the emerging promise and future direction of NIRS research & application pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35321522/
2/15
Perrey & Ferrari's review on NIRS in the context of sport science gives background and is a great jumping off point for NIRS studies in your particular sport of interest pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29177977/
3/15
Barstow has a comprehensive overview of technically and biologically important aspects of NIRS, with recommendations for standardised methodology and nomenclature. This is a must read IMO for starting to understand the nuances of NIRS interpretation pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30844336/
4/15 @JanBoone2906 et al at Ghent University have published definitive experiments describing NIRS response profiles during incremental ramp testing. Start here to visualise how NIRS responds in an intensity-dependent manner pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27613650/
5/15 @MuriasLab et al at U of Calgary have also exhaustively investigated NIRS responses during exercise, characterising the deoxygenation breakpoint / HHb-plateau along with other threshold demarcations pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25606817/
6/15
There is a wonderfully productive ongoing debate on the association between NIRS and other physiological breakpoints pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29975303/
7/15
This debate has helped reveal operational limitations of how we use and think about 'thresholds'. To me, a critical aspect is the uncertainty inherent to any breakpoint detection method. Elegantly demonstrated by @KevinCaen@JanBoone2906 et al pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35435465/
8/15
Another exciting application of NIRS is for non-invasive measurement of mitochondrial function, introduced by Ryan, @InfraredRx, @harrybrossiter et al. This method is now widely used across clinical and sport applications pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28684592/
9/15
It's important to consider what *isn't* illuminated by NIRS. NIRS is hyper-local. There are critical spatial and (bio)mechanical effects to consider, such as deep vs superficial muscle heterogeneities pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26404619/
10/15
Vastus lateralis is the primary locomotor muscle studied in cycling. Rectus femoris in running. There are important modality- and quadricep head-specific recruitment & deoxygenation patterns pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28970805/
11/15
Consider NIRS responses of non-locomotor muscles during exercise such as bicep or deltoid, and what this might reveal in terms of systemic metabolic priorities pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20204819/
12/15
Adipose tissue thickness has large effects on NIRS signals. Especially consider differences in male & female subcutaneous fat distribution on quadriceps when interpreting locomotor NIRS signals pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28151429/
13/15
Consider how NIRS measurements at the microvasculature (capillaries) are *expected* to differ from classical experiments that measure at larger conduit vessels (e.g. femoral or brachial aa. & vv.) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32940560/
14/15
We have to consider *mechanical effects* like isometric vs rhythmic (e.g. cadence) contractions, which change recruitment patterns and spatial distribution of tissue & fluid volumes into and out of the illuminated area pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27126859/
15/15
There are so many more applications & nuances to NIRS
Start with the reviews at the top of this thread and come back later for the more nuanced experiments toward the bottom
Dig through the citation trains of these papers to discover what else you might be interested in!
16/15
Or listen / watch me try a few times recently to articulate a story about oxygenation response profiles during incremental exercise testing, trying to keep all of these nuances straight š„“
Lactate curves in a 5-1 multi-stage cycling test across workload (W/kg). Modelled with VO2peak (range 44-74 ml/min/kg). ā Wpeak ā ā VO2peak along x-axis.
Nice to see the expected longer steady-state achieved by higher fitness subjects before inflection point 1/2
I think the really interesting trend is BLa plotted on relative workload (% individual Wpeak, as proxy for intensity).
Higher fitness:
Longer steady-state
Nadir at ~60% Wpeak (vs no nadir)
Inflection starts at higher intensity
Higher BLa at Wpeak (higher La- flux?) 2/2
Ok, might as well look at Fat oxidation while we're here š Plotted on normalised workload (W/kg) 3/4
Looks like FatMax (W/kg) occurs within ~1 stage (0.5 W/kg) of BLamin
Bias = 0.09 W/kg
95%CI Limits of agreement = -0.5-0.7 W/kg
Pearson r = 0.84, 95%CI 0.71-0.92