What this cashes out to for an "operator" in digital disinfo & extremism spaces - your average #NAFOfella at information war, in other words - is that if you run across an Indian spammer or (in the OP's case) rando shithead...
They're probably fash, and they endorse lynchings.
The key factors is BJP affiliation, conservative ideology, and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
Spot those on a timeline (or even Facebook page), and by and large, you've got yourself an Indian fashie on your hands.
I should also add a clarification of what I mean by "dictionary sense of lynching"
The reason why trashpreneur #parmesanGirl is going through my followers list, and blocking anyone who follows me, is because of a fundamental lie of disinformation that she has to keep up: the lie of popular support.
Understanding it requires starting with the basics of disinfo.
Given unrecoverable intent, disinfo studies have a kind of lack of basis.
You can get past this pretty easy with data - and I'm a huge fan of data tools, you see me use them all the time.
But there's more to this than, like, counting tweets and scrolling timelines.
There are also basic felicity conditions that underlie speech.
Insofar as disinformation is an *intentional* act, it will tend to break one of these maxims, or some other unenumerated felicity condition.
Given its modularity and relative plentitude (we have about 5k in inventory and ordered 83 in Sept. 2021) I'm actually sort of surprised we haven't sent them.
So, I don't think NAFO folks - or for that matter, much of this Twitter audience - is going to be familiar with Meth Squirrel, a perpetually write-in candidate for Alabama's Republican Senate nomination?