It has been a couple of weeks since #EmergencyState was published - in this thread I'm going to share some of the reviews so far. And not just the good ones! 😬☺️🧵
"well written and accessible [to] coherently draw together the ratcheting of fiat law into everything from the public joy of a walk in the country to the private joy of the bedroom.This is no dry legal telling of the tale" @iofiv on @davidallengreen's blog davidallengreen.com/2022/10/guest-…
"self-righteous", "courtly", "the book doesn’t quite sing",
Quentin Letts in @thetimes - thetimes.co.uk/article/emerge…
You decide if that makes you want to read it or not!
"Wagner’s book is a vital contribution to a debate we need to have: how to ensure that the biggest casualty of the next pandemic is not the democratic model" @stephenkb in @FTft.com/content/6bf923…
"This book is the definitive legal guide to the law of the pandemic and will serve as an important historical account of this dark and challenging period in our history." @lawsocgazette (which gave it five stars) lawgazette.co.uk/reviews/emerge…
"invaluable... it’s hard to disagree when he writes: “British society became as close to a police state as in living memory.” The most important legacy of the pandemic may be to avoid that ever happening again." @JewishChronthejc.com/life-and-cultu…
I think that's the reviews so far - I have heard a particularly interesting one, by someone particularly interesting, is in the pipeline... it will certainly be a spicy one! I will post when it's out
Can the “North London” jibes please stop? I appreciate it is a chance for the new prime minister to make a cheap jibe against his opponent but it demeans him most. Also every time I hear “North London” I think “do they mean Jews” which I assume isn’t what he means but just stop
This government, no matter which of the 3 prime ministers (so far), have made consistently nasty, personal comments about “lefty lawyers”, tofu, north London etc. Maybe if they stopped being so hostile and listened to people for a change they might not be in the trouble they are
If the government had paid more attention to “lefty” (or any) lawyers they might not have been found by the police to have arranged illegal gatherings throughout lockdowns. Sometimes the experts are right
My view on Braverman is that forwarding a private government document through her private email and being caught because she cc'd the wrong person was a serious error of judgment but there are other things to be more worried about her being Home Secretary newstatesman.com/politics/uk-po…
She seemed, under Truss particularly, to be incapable of maintaining cabinet discipline - regularly undermining govt positions (e.g. about not leaving the European Convention on Human Rights) - but all this points to what I said in my article 2 years ago: she is an ideologue
Even Patel (who seemed a hardline and not very effective Home Secretary) didn't say things like she "dreams" to send asylum seekers to Rwanda. The Home Secretary has responsibility for some of the most vulnerable and persecuted in society, this isn't good independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Raab's bill of rights was a pig's ear of a bill and I would be surprised if it is allowed to be resurrected, but as @davidallengreen says, the Human Rights Act is Raab's Moby Dick
Important to remember that just because Sunak is having a "fresh start" media moment, the country is being subjected to the same ministerial merry-go-round and lawmaking chaos.
Raab in Justice a good example - his flagship bill of rights was junked in the last round of chaos
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill is a huge power transfer to the executive, allowing the government - with almost no parliamentary scrutiny, to change vast swathes of our law. The most consequential and boringly named bill in our history?
Because it's in the Conservative party Constitution which can't be changed in the next 24 hours and itself would need to be approved by the members? public.conservatives.com/organisation-d…
.. and proud
See this article. The use of "self-confessed" suggests this it is a bad thing. I don't think it is. I think the government with its rhetoric in the past few years has tried to make it out that it is newstatesman.com/ideas/intervie…
There are many great lawyers who are not in any shape or form "activists" and that's great - as I have said for many years there is no need to be a "lawyer in public" as some are, but I also think there is great value when lawyers engage with the public beyond their cases