The best way to monetize Twitter verification is to turn it into a reality series, where the verified have to defend their badges - to the death - against nearly identical wannabes - live on TV, er, streamed on Twitter.
This is exactly like emergency row seats on planes. Originally, they were supposed to be for those qualified to help in emergency, now it's whatever sloppy monster has an extra $54. And those rows are always full.
At the end of the day, nobody *needs* Twitter. Twitter is a vanity project. And the egos will pay.
It's also very likely that the $20 a month verification *announcement* is a trial balloon.
First, they leaked "$4.99", then $20.
I think Elon is trying to gauge the right price, based on reaction (to calculate likely attrition/adoption).
Twitter can easily create a tiered verification pricing system, based on size of following.
Brokerages charge 1-2% based on assets managed. Substack charges 10%. As revenues go up, so do fees.
Followers is less direct, but marketing reach is valuable & quantifiable.
The advantage of a tiered verification system is there's a built-in disincentive to have fake or inactive followers, depending on how it's priced and who's paying.
Elon isn't stupid. There will be additional perks to verification, besides ego-stroking, that will drive up the blue check value proposition. Though it will be a challenge to balance pay-to-play and perception of exclusivity.
Most big infrastructure-level tech needs have been met & settled (electricity, phones, mobile, internet, etc). Ditto survival needs (food, housing, transport). Watch Shark Tank to see the flimsiness of what's left.
Data & digital communication is frictionless. You can acquire millions of users/customers faster than anything tethered to the physical world. This meant certain industries were immediately vulnerable, esp media/ads.
I don't think the future is federated social networks. Complexity exceeds benefit for most.
Disrupters won't tweak the existing paradigm (posting X to Y publicly/privately) but innovate:
—mode of exchange
—content generation
—discovery
—reach
—context
—user experience
Great piece by @ChristineEmba on "effective altruism" & its sister philosophy "longtermism" that absolves adherents from the messiness of helping those on earth today, liberating them to work on existential threats to theoretical citizens of tomorrow.
@ChristineEmba To be fair, there are valid counter-arguments.
1) If you created massive value & wealth, why shouldn't you be able to work on whatever projects you choose?
2) Who's to say Musk/Bezos & others aren't right? Maybe we do need some forward thinkers working on future problems?
2/
@ChristineEmba 3) Even if you don't think billionaires should exist, it would be hard to argue that political leaders of today have allocated/managed resources effectively & are better qualified to solve big problems, if they seized additional resources from effective altruists.
3/
The tweet below got me thinking about an interesting concept: #MVI.
Like MVP (a product with just enough features to be usable by early customers), MVI is the minimum amount of information/data/research/analysis needed to make a viable business decision.
"A half-century..power play..by corporations, Wall Street, govts & central banks, has gone badly wrong...the West..now face[s] an impossible choice: Push conglomerates &..states into..bankruptcies or allow inflation to go unchecked"—@yanisvaroufakis project-syndicate.org/commentary/inf…
1/7
"Meanwhile, governments were cutting public expenditure, jobs & services. It was..lavish socialism for capital & harsh austerity for labor."
Always interesting to read Yanis's perspective. I agree there's been a hijacking of capital & resulting concentration of power.
2/7
Where Yanis & I part ways is he believes good (& bigger) govt can counterbalance private power. Ideally, yes. But our govt is a captive/accomplice/perpetrator/enforcer of that power.
Example: he supports a govt cryptocurrency to issue money directly.
Good immigration policy isn't that hard.
1—Let in entrepreneurs, top students & educated professionals w/citizenship intent+market need
2—Laborers, market need
3—Asylum seekers, caseXcase
4—Improve nations of migrants we don't need via trade
5—Path for illegals
6—Boot bad actors