There is a full scale political crisis for the home secretary Suella Braverman and new PM Rishi Sunak in the failure to prevent the Manston migrant processing centre being totally overwhelmed by asylum seekers. Here are the important facts. 1/20
Both Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel rejected advice from home office officials to book hotel accomodation to cope with the surge in asylum seeker numbers illegally crossing the channel. 2/20
They did this because they believed this was the way to put pressure on their officials to find a way to speed up the processing of asylum applications. 3/20
Braverman has never booked hotel rooms. Patel booked such rooms for a period but then stopped many months before resigning as home secretary. 4/20
Braverman and Patel will be pressed by opposition parties to explain why they refused to follow home office recommendations, when Grant Shapps did take home office advice and started to book hotel rooms in the few days he spent as Home Secretary. 5/20
Robert Jenrick has revived the booking of hotel rooms in just the four days he has spent as immigration minister. I understand Shapps signed off the use of between 10 and 12 hotels. 6/20
Astonishingly, neither Patel or Braverman has ever visited Manston, I am told. 7/20
There are currently 4000 asylum seekers sleeping on Manston's floors, compared to the official maximum of 1500 to 1800. The conditions are described as "very austere" according to a witness. 8/20
There are no beds or even proper mattresses, only blankets and a few army-style rolled up mattresses. "It's like a giant village hall" said a source, who said the staff there were "amazing", and that the medical centre is "good". 9/20
Under English law, not European human rights law, the maximum length of stay is supposed to be 24 hours. There are some asylum seekers at Manston who have been there for three weeks to four weeks.10/20
There is an assumption that charities specialising in help for asylum seekers will sue the government for keeping asylum seekers at Manston longer than the maximum 24 hours. 11/20
As Home Office source told me, this creates prospect for Sunak's government that it will be forced to pay out maybe £5000 or £6000 each not to those fleeing persecution in dangerous countries but - for example - to Albanian economic migrants, many of whom may be criminals. 12/20
"That would be a disaster for the government, but it is very likely to happen" said a source. 13/20
In respect of the immediate humanitarian problems at Manston, this should ease a bit this week, as migrants are moved to hotels, and with bad weather in the Channel slowing the numbers making the journey from France to the UK. 14/20
But October and November are usually months where large numbers of asylum seekers risk their lives crossing the Channel, because many of them do seasonal work on French farms over the summer and then attempt to come to the UK. 15/20
The Home Office expects between 10,000 and 15,000 asylum seekers to come to the UK before the end of the year, so Manston will remain under unsustainable pressure. 16/20
The second massive political headache for Sunak and Braverman is the cost of putting asylum seekers in hotels. This costs circa £150 a night. 17/20
To cope with the immediate surge in numbers, the Home Office has both booked entire hotels and what are called "spot booking", or individual rooms in hotels. "It's incredibly expensive" said a home office source. 18/20
There is a particular problem with Albanian men crossing the Channel illegally to find work for around 9 months or to work in crime, such as county lines drugs trade. According to Home Office, up to 2% of Albanian men have come to UK illegally or contemplate doing so. 19/20
When Braverman addresses the Commons today on all this, as she is expected to do, she will be fighting to keep a job she's had only since Wednesday. 20/20
PS Source close to Priti Patel insists she was signing off hotel accommodation all through summer. “No matter how unpalatable it was she always did it because not to do so would have breeches statutory duties…
“We never breached statutory duties”. So the big question for Braverman is whether she has breached statutory duties.
Another source: “Priti was definitely still signing off over the summer as a load of asylum seekers were moved into a wildly inappropriate location near a roundabout in rural Lincolnshire. It annoyed local people but was far worse for the people moved in themselves”.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What is extraordinary is not that Boris Johnson pulled out of the Tory leadership contest tonight. 1/10
What’s extraordinary is that he believed he had a chance of returning to No10 so soon after being evicted by those mass ministerial resignations less than four months ago. 2/10
The point is that so many Tory MPs still believe he is both untrustworthy and shambolic, such that they could not contemplate serving in a government led by him. 3/10
Sunak has the momentum in the MPs contest. He is circa 60 nominations away from having 179 backers, or the support of more than half of MPs - and before a single vote has been cast. At that point it is realistic to ask whether either Mordaunt or Johnson could reach…
the threshold of 100 nominations. It is possible this will all be done and dusted, with Sunak crowned new Tory leader and UK prime minister, at 2pm tomorrow afternoon. To be clear, we are in the territory of realistic hypothesis, not certainty. But Sunak’s lobbying…
operation seems to be working. In a way, having warned very loudly that Truss’s tax-cutting plans would be a catastrophe, perhaps that should not be a surprise. It is probable also that many MPs have looked over the precipice, since Johnson’s supporters started their campaign…
It is hard to exaggerate how big a moment this is for the Conservative Party, and for Boris Johnson. If he chooses to run to be leader and PM, he may well win - thanks to his popularity among Tory members (though considerably fewer than half Tory MPs are thought to…
want him back in No10). His virtue, according to his fans, is that he is what they call a “winner”. But although he is an impressive campaigner, in the 2019 election campaign, circumstance endowed him with three advantages that have gone: the pledge to “get Brexit done”; an…
opposition leader in Corbyn deeply unpopular with some former Labour voters; and a public sector balance sheet which made it possible to do what he loves doing, that is promising lots of public spending. He has no such endowment now, so any campaign led…
Talking to member of the cabinet last night, it’s clear there is a collective will among ministers to try to keep Liz Truss in office till 31 October, so that the chancellor can determine which further taxes need to rise and what spending should be cut in that de facto budget,…
the medium term fiscal plan, without the instability of not knowing who will be next PM. But their loyalty to her extends no longer than Hallowe’en, and this minister also told me the cabinet’s support couldn’t even be guaranteed for just those seven days. For Truss, of…
course, any stay of execution delivers her the hope that maybe there are plausible circumstances in which she won’t be evicted. For her those ten days are incredibly precious, a theoretical lifeline, which is why she had to put out that humiliating 1.33am statement stating…
Here is Downing Street's version of why @SuellaBraverman's security breach was a sacking offence. 1) the information she sent out related to a new policy to let in more high skilled workers, and stimulate growth - which was relevant to the @OBR_UK assessment of...
how fast the economy will grow and was therefore price sensitive (it was highly confidential till announced by Jeremy Hunt on 31 Oct says source); 2) it was sent out using the private email server on Braverman's phone (an accident, says Braverman); 3) it was sent to a...
Tory MP who is not a member of the government and also ended up with someone not even an MP because Braverman put in the wrong address in the CC email box (and it was this person who shopped Braverman). As Dominic Cummings points out, under Johnson plenty of ...
On Monday the prime minister said: “I’ve fixed the mistakes”. That’s not quite right. What she might more properly have said is “my new chancellor is trying to fix my mistakes, but lasting damage has been done”. 1/20
The point is that the mini budget has increased the hole in the public finances by more than the direct impact of the mini-budget’s unfunded tax increases. 2/20
By undermining investors’ confidence in the government’s economic competence, the mini-budget increased the relative interest rate the government has to pay to borrow - and that caused an indirect but significant deepening of the hole in the public finances. 3/20