1/ As people flee Twitter, or threaten to, in response to Elon’s takeover and the harassment it has already spawned and likely will bc of less content moderation, there are some things I’ve noticed. Please follow this thread and share it. It’s sorta important…
2/ To illustrate the point I want to make (and will, shortly), first, a brief story. It takes place in New Orleans, in 1996. I am sitting in a workshop (as a participant, not facilitator), and we are discussing racism and community building…
3/ After a Black woman has been sharing her stories of dealing with racism, a white woman begins to cry. As one does. Then when the facilitator calls on her, she talks about how “hard” this work is and how dispiriting…
4/ She despairs of ever undoing racism, either among some in her own family or professional circles, or society more broadly. She again talks of how “hard” it all is and how it makes her want to give up sometimes…
5/ At this point the Black woman who had previously spoken reached out, touched her leg, and with a cutting snark too brilliant for the white woman to get it, said, “Is it hard, dear?” The white woman cried more and insisted it was, yes…
6/ That day was the day I forever understood that Black people are possibly the only thing standing in the way of utter destruction. White folks, even liberal ones, will often fold up their tents and go home when it gets too difficult…
7/ But Black people cannot, by and large, do this. They have never been able to do this. They have to stay and fight no matter the cost. Now, back to the “Twexodus”…
8/ I can’t say it scientifically. Not even sure how to prove it quantitatively. But I can say that after much careful observation, the people threatening to jump ship (and from what I know those who have) have been overwhelmingly white…
9/ Even as Black Twitter catches the most hell, deals with racism, misogynoir, all the things, all the time…they are here, fighting and refusing to concede this ground…
10/ While a distressing number of white progressives talk about how “toxic” it will become (or has already) and how they just can’t be around that. “Is it hard, dear?” Rings in my ears yet again…
11/ And yes, I know that women face more than I do as a man. Rape threats are an entirely different thing. I get it. But, um, yeah, so Black women face that every day. They aren’t bailing the same way…
12/ To those white folks worried about Twitter toxicity. Please, AMERICA has been toxic for Black people for hundreds of years. If they can manage to fight on, survive and thrive despite it, you can deal with ugliness in your timeline.
13/ And please know none of this is meant to romanticize suffering or the strength often born of it. It is simply to say that when you’ve been wading thru the shit for hundreds of years, you learn how to wade through it. It’s the only choice you have…
14/ But when you haven’t had to (a privilege) it’s easy to take your toys and go home, so to speak. I think the white folks who DON’T do this tend to be those of us whose consciousness was formed by the Black freedom struggle…
15/ because when THAT was your entry point for social awareness you learn that justice is a long game, and you might well never see it. Better than you have come and gone without seeing it. But you have to take your place in the long line of those willing to die for it…
16/ White folks who, on the other hand, were not principally informed by that struggle get dispirited easily because they haven’t learned from that inter generational resilience…
17/ Some of us came to anti racism first, and THEN our progressive politics because of how we were raised and around whom (this is often the Southern white progressive story). Others came to progressive politics and then that included anti-racism but just as one of many issues…
18/ I would say that if you come to your anti racism just as one more thing in your liberal/left bag of issues, you won’t be ready for the difficulty you’ll face no matter which issues you focus on in your work/life…
19/…but if you start with a grounding in the Black freedom struggle, or develop that grounding, you will develop the kind of resolve and long-view that keeps you in the fight and wards off the kind of despondency that leads many to pack it in…
20/ James Baldwin explained it this way: “If one is continually surviving the worst that life can bring, one eventually ceases to be controlled by a fear of what life can bring; whatever it bring must be borne…” Black people know this. White progressives must learn it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People who say Social Security is a Ponzi scheme are the most uninformed people in the world. The argument, it seems, is that because current workers pay current retirees it's some kind of scam, like a Ponzi, but this is just silly. A 🧵...
2/ First off, the only way SS could have been set up was for current retirees to have their benefits paid by current workers, because when it was established, retirees obviously hadn't paid in enough to fully fund their retirement accounts. So yeah, that's how it works...
3/ But that doesn't make it a Ponzi. Everyone gets retirement money commensurate w/earnings. No it's not YOUR money you get back (there's no lock box where contributions are stored), but it's an amount based on what you DID pay in, which was previously paid to earlier retirees...
Saying "He who saves his country does not break any law," is not only ridiculous, legally, but it's an incitement to extremist violence. Whether one is "saving one's country" is a matter of interpretation. And to Trump, anything that makes America whiter saves it.
A 🧵...
2/ This is the position of every neo-Nazi and other white nationalist too. So whether it's anti-Black violence, anti-immigrant violence, or other related forms (anti-Muslim, anti-Jewish), extremists will see this statement from Trump as a green light...
3/ And the threat is not academic or hypothetical. Right now the DOJ is prosecuting leaders of the Terrorgram Collective -- a white supremacist group designated as a terrorist org in the waning days of the Biden administration. So far Trump's DOJ is still prosecuting them...
MLK believed in the equity efforts Trump opposes (including affirmative action). He fought to end housing discrimination. Trump was sued for practicing it. He acknowledged America's systemic racism problem. Trump would ban that concept in schools and government trainings. A 🧵..
2/ I realize many of you don't know any of this about King's views bc all you've heard is one line (out of context) from one speech and you never read his books. If you had even listened to the entire I Have a Dream Speech you would know better...
3/ In that speech he accused America of giving Black folks “a bad check." Then in 1964 in Why We Can't Wait he mocked those who opposed what we would now call affirmative action for not understanding what equal opportunity required. Here's what he said...
2/ First, as @kareem_carr noted, there is no source offered to verify this data, and there's good reason to believe it's made up, bc the FBI doesn’t release data two weeks into a new year, on last year’s homicide rates. The data lag tends to take longer than that...
3/ And yes, that matters because it calls into question why someone would just make up these numbers and share them like some bombshell. The motivation can only be, logically, to stoke racial fears and resentment. There is no innocent explanation. None...
For people who assumed the NOLA truck terrorist was an undocumented border crosser, despite no evidence (he was, in fact, born in the US), what is wrong with you? Do you even care that your ignorant hot takes are wrong? Or is deception OK in the service of your cause? A 🧵...
2/ Will you now just pivot to Islam and call for crackdowns on Muslims, including citizens, since the terrorist had an ISIS flag and (from what we can assume) was motivated by Muslim extremism?...
3/ And that begs the question: what would you have called for if this guy had been white and/or Christian? When a white dude blew up a half-block of downtown w/a truck bomb in Nashville several years back y'all went quiet soon as his ID was made. We know why...
Funny (but not surprising) how John McWhorter in today's NYT (link at the end) took my quote about Daniel Penny's killing of Jordan Neely and proceeded to "rebut" it while ignoring two-thirds of what I claimed, and the argument underlying the other third. A 🧵...
2/ First, I called Penny a "racist, classist, ableist murderer." I said it. I meant it. I stand by it. Interestingly, McWhorter ignored the classism and ableism pieces altogether, even though I deliberately included them and view the three things as intersectional here...
3/ ...meaning, I think it was the combo of Neely's blackness, his economic status, and his mental illness (disability) that made Penny's reaction more likely. So, for instance, I doubt he treats a Black stockbroker in a suit that way on the subway, even if acting a bit "off..."