Michael Thomas Profile picture
Nov 1, 2022 19 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Recently I learned about a man who has trained 1,000+ people to block wind and solar projects.

I read through all his training materials, presentations, and seminars.

Here's what I learned about him and how his students plan to "win the war on clean energy."

🧵
The odds are pretty good you haven't heard of this man, John Droz, Jr.

He's only been interviewed by a few journalists. And when asked about his influence he always responds the same way:

"This story isn't about me." Image
But the story of climate action and delay in America is very much about Droz.

For most of his life, Droz was a semi-retired real estate developer. In 2011, he reinvented himself and became a "physicist."

That year, his home state of N.C. debated a bill about climate change.
Droz put together a series of presentations, some as long as 168 slides, and headed to the capital.

He had crunched the numbers and looked at the science.

According to Droz, climate change was a sham pushed by clean energy lobbyists. Image
Remarkably, many legislators listened to him.

Even the Washington Post listened to him. In an article about sea-level rise, they quoted the real estate developer as a "local physicist." Image
Droz's efforts worked. In 2012, N.C. passed a bill that prevented the state from taking action on sea-level rise.

This work got the attention of the biggest climate deniers in the country.

That year, ATI, a dark money think tank brought him on as a fellow.
At ATI, Droz developed a playbook that would eventually be used by thousands of people to stop clean energy projects.

In 2012, he organized a secret meeting and training session to share his strategy with some of the country's most influential climate deniers and activists. Image
For Droz, winning the war on clean energy is all about communication.

The man is obsessed with what he calls “Press relations (PR) strategy.”

Those two letters—PR—are in hundreds of documents he's produced over the last decade.
What’s the goal of this PR?

As he wrote, “Public opinion [on clean energy] must begin to change among citizens at large.”

But changing minds wasn’t all Droz was interested in.

The next line in his memo reads: “Ultimate Goal: Change policy direction based on the message.” Image
Droz, like many climate deniers, understood the power of offering the public and lawmakers a set of “alternative facts.”

All credible experts agree wind energy is better for the environment than fossil fuels.

Droz knew it was possible to convince people otherwise. Image
Clean energy projects create jobs and tax revenue. They're great for local economies.

Droz offered an alternative assessment. Image
At the secret meeting in 2012, he proposed an idea:

Established think tanks like Heartland, CFACT, and Cato could publish these "alternative facts."

And volunteers in communities across the U.S. could present them to local lawmakers. Image
Of course, these volunteers couldn't just be against clean energy.

Droz wrote about this in a later training document titled "What Not To Say."

He writes that if you're against something, "You will be painted as a denier and as a person against progress (going green)."
One of Droz' most effective students, Susan Ralston, mastered this principle.

She named her organization "Citizens for Responsible Solar."

The group has blocked huge projects across Virginia. Their main argument: Solar should be on rooftops, not rural land. Image
By far the most unique tactic, I saw in Droz' training materials was his suggestion that clean energy opponents never compromise.

According to Droz, the way to win "the war on clean energy" is to come out with aggressive demands and stick to them. Image
This approach has led his students to pass laws that literally or effectively ban clean energy in communities across the United States.

When they don't succeed at that, they file lawsuits that can drag out for years.
All around the country, clean energy opponents are using this playbook to block solar and wind farms.

Projects that could have offered substantial carbon emissions reductions in almost every state have been blocked as a result.
As for John Droz? He's reinvented himself once more.

In searching public records for his name, I came across dozens of emails to officials everywhere from Arizona to Pennsylvania about his "independent analysis of the 2020 election."

Droz is now an election security expert.
Later this week I plan to publish a story about who is funding and spreading clean energy misinformation.

Stay tuned.

And if you missed it, you can check out last week's story below:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Thomas

Michael Thomas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @curious_founder

Oct 1
One of the tragedies of Hurricane Helene is how few people had flood insurance.

I pulled data from FEMA for every county in North Carolina.

In most inland communities, less than 1% of homes were insured before the storm.

distilled.earth/p/hurricane-he…
Image
Take Buncombe County, where Asheville is located, for example.

The county has 137,123 housing units.

But just 941 of those units—less than 0.7%—have flood insurance through the NFIP, the federal insurance program that issues 97% of the country’s flood insurance plans.
A recent report found that 16,306 properties located in Buncombe County were at risk of flooding in a 1-in-100 year storm.

Last week’s flood was a 1-in-1,000 year event. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 29
The world's largest climate and weather data archive is located in Asheville, NC.

Due to an historic climate disaster, its currently offline.
I was going to NCEI's website for a story I'm working on about Hurricane Helene and America's increasingly fragile insurance system.

Public resources like this are essential to journalism and our understanding of the world.

distilled.earth
But these public resources are under threat.

Trump's top allies and former administration officials have proposed dismantling NOAA and NCEI.

They want to gut our early hurricane warning systems, our climate modeling, our scientific institutions.

theguardian.com/us-news/2024/a…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 20
I think about this cartoon a lot. Image
Now is probably a good time to plug my work.

I write a newsletter about climate change. You can subscribe to it here:

distilled.earth
Sometimes I write about internet memes like this one about wind turbines made from coal:

distilled.earth/p/this-anti-re…
Read 5 tweets
Sep 2
The Economist just published this incredible and tragic chart.

Given how many people are killed each year by big cars, it's worth understanding how we got here.

Story time 🧵 Image
In the last few decades, the SUV market in the U.S. has exploded.

According to automakers, changing consumer preferences explain this growth.

But these preferences didn't just change naturally. Automakers, and their successsful lobbying efforts, played a critical role. Image
In 1975, Congress passed a law that forced automakers to double the average fuel efficiency of their vehicles to 27.5 miles per gallon by 1985.

For a few years, the bill worked as intended.
Read 15 tweets
Aug 27
This example from @TheEconomist's latest article on crypto mining in Texas is crazy. Image
@TheEconomist I get the argument that bitcoin miners make for why they should be able to participate in demand response programs.

They are a big electricity load and can help cut peak demand.

But these programs were designed to incentivize energy savings. Attracting bitcoin miners with..
@TheEconomist .. a new source of revenue does the opposite. It creates better economics for an activity that has little value beyond financial speculation.

It also makes the economics worse for participants that are sacrificing a productive activity (e.g. making steel to build homes).
Read 4 tweets
Aug 22
Climate change is often framed as a complex problem that requires a PHD to understand.

The solutions are also framed as complex.

But it's actually pretty simple. The issue is that the politics of it—mostly incumbent power—are hard.

That difference is subtle but important.
Here's the problem of climate change in a nutshell:

Humans are burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests, and factory farming.

Those activities are pumping gasses into the atmosphere.

If we don't stop, the stable climate modern life depends on will become unstable.
Here's the solution in a nutshell:

- Replace fossil fuel power plants with carbon-free energy
- Electrify everything (cars, homes, factories, etc) to run on said clean energy.
- Invent some technologies for the stuff we can't electrify our way out of.
- Eat more plants
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(