In 1994, the Krok family was the 5th richest in South Africa. Headed by identical twins Solly and Abe, they had made their vast fortune from selling cancer-causing skin-lightening creams to Black consumers since the 1950s. This is not spoken about enough.
[𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝]
The Krok brothers bought a pharmacy in the Johannesburg CBD in the 50s, and from here they distributed 'SuperRose', a skin-bleaching cream aimed at Black women, which they advertised with slogans like "Men run after women who use SuperRose creams and soap".
The Kroks had purchased a pharmacy between the train station and the busy Noord Street taxi rank, putting them right at the centre of the lucrative commerce generated by black foot traffic. Their first-ever product was Bloodlax, which they marketed as a 'blood purifier'
Now, because of Apartheid laws and culture—specifically colourism—many Black people felt pressured to lighten their skin due to the 'benefits' that came with a fairer tone. A lighter skin often gave one confidence that employment prospects would improve, for instance.
Eldridge Mathebula, a leader of the Black Consumers' Union said: "Psychologically [some Black people] believe they will have more opportunities and be more successful in whatever they do if their skin is whiter."
Solly had this to say about what drew them to the industry: "If a Black had a light skin, they were perceived to be in a different status than a Black dark person. I believe it was a status symbol that I'm lighter, I’m more educated, I'm more affluent or I'm more Westernised".
By the late 60s, it was estimated that 60% of black women in urban areas used skin-lightening products. Bleaching creams became the 4th most used household product, after soap, tea, and powdered milk. The Kroks were emerging as the major players in this market.
The Krok brothers had their big break after they started manufacturing their own products, specifically when they experimented with hydroquinone instead of the mercury used by other brands. Hydroquinone is a photography developing agent that interferes with melanin production.
When the South African government banned the use of mercury in cosmetics in 1975, the Krok's competitors went out of business. Armed with hydroquinone in brands like Hollywood 7, He-Man, Kool Look and Aviva, the Kroks were now their own competition, and soon became millionaires.
According to historian Lynn M. Thomas, "Over time, the Kroks pushed the trade in more dangerous directions by encouraging consumers to use multiple lightening products and producing ones that contained some of the highest levels of hydroquinone".
By the mid-70s, doctors were warning of the disfiguring effects of hydroquinone. They showed how hydroquinone, combined with the high levels of UV rays in southern Africa was causing a form of bluish-black hyper-pigmentation known as exogenous ochronosis.
A study of 13 skin bleaching brands—7 of which belonged to the Kroks—found that they contained between 2.5 & 7.5% hydroquinone. Two of the Krok's brands contained between 5.5 & 7.5%. The legal maximum was 2%. But even when they did obey the law, the Kroks still caused damage...
Even though the amount of hq in their original lotion was within the law, the Kroks recommended that it be used before applying one of their competitor's creams. By doing this, they encouraged consumers to double their exposure to the toxic agent. Explaining this, Solly said:
"So I said to my brother we don’t have to fight these guys. We said we don’t care if you use any famous cream as long as before you use that cream you cleanse with our lotion. And it became the hottest seller in the world."
With their dominance in the skin bleaching industry firmly established, the Kroks diversified into food, furniture, construction, engineering, and entertainment.
They also bought subsidiaries of foreign companies leaving South Africa because of Apartheid sanctions
When skin-bleaching products were eventually banned in 1990, the Kroks had made enough money to shrug this setback off. They were at the time reportedly making between R70 and R80 million a year from this one business, and by 1994, they were filthy rich.
From 1994, the Krok family was involved in even bigger things after 1994: capturing the courts, the ANC, and its Black elites and stealing intellectual property; but we'll talk about those another time. For now, please subscribe to my blog patreon.com/sizwelo
Source: Skin Lighteners, Black Consumers and
Jewish Entrepreneurs in South Africa by Lynn M. Thomas
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
South Africa is not on the brink of collapse. It is collapsing—slowly, carefully—under the supervision of its ruling elites. This is a managed collapse strategy: the deliberate acceptance of economic stagnation and slow degradation to protect existing wealth structures
🧵🧵
Under South Africa’s managed decline, public investment, industrial policy or breaking up monopolies have been ruled out. Instead, the government embarks on minimalist crisis management, designed not to solve economic and social decay but to spread it out over decades.
The pattern is not difficult to see: Budget cuts gradually hollow out the state, avoiding dramatic collapse but eroding public services over time. Alongside this, the government regularly announces reforms with no meaningful implementation, creating the illusion that change may be around the corner.
When people talk about South Africa’s high crime rate, they often blame it on poverty. But the thing is, many countries with even higher poverty rates experience significantly lower crime levels🧵🧵
The discrepancy in crime rates between SA and others is because the real problem in South Africa is inequality—you know, the vast gap between rich and poor. South Africa has one of the biggest wealth gaps in the world.
Poverty and crime are often linked in the public imagination, but the relationship is more complex. Numerous poorer countries—including many in Africa, Asia and Latin America—report lower crime rates than South Africa. What sets South Africa apart is not merely widespread poverty but the obscene gap between the rich and the poor.
Here’s a brutal truth: South Africa could have the cleanest, most efficient government on earth—and would still remain poor. This is because poverty is not an administrative problem. It’s a structural issue. And it has only one solution: mass industrialisation🧵🧵
Mass industrialisation means building an economy where large numbers of people are employed to transform raw materials into finished products across many industries. Steel plants, car assembly lines, textile mills, agro-processing hubs, chemical plants, electronics, etc.
Someone might say South Africa has industries, mines, cars and some factories. However, the difference between what South Africa is doing now and true mass industrialisation is scale, focus and purpose. South Africa is stuck in a mining-export trap, not real industrialisation.
Today, on Freedom Day, the dominant culture still teaches that many South Africans are poor because of personal failure—a lack of effort, discipline or talent. It tells a seductive story: that opportunity is equal, success is earned and failure is deserved. This is a lie🧵🧵
People often say that for the economy and the country to work, people must be hired on merit. However, the truth is that although widely held, the belief that merit rather than luck determines success or failure in the world is demonstrably false.
The idea that people attain success, power and influence based on their proven abilities and merit is an attempt to erase South Africa’s historical legacy by shifting the blame for racial inequality onto those still suffering its consequences—while allowing the privileged to feel righteous and self-made.
The South African government & private sector repeatedly claim the high unemployment rate is due to a “skills shortage”. This is not only misleading but also deflects from the real issue: South Africa lacks the industrial capacity to absorb its labour🧵
For years, we’ve been told that the problem isn’t the economy’s failure to create jobs, but rather a “skills mismatch.” If only workers were better trained, the thinking goes, they’d find employment. But here’s the truth: You can’t train your way out of an unproductive economy.
Deindustrialisation has hollowed out South Africa’s economy since the 1990s. Manufacturing—once a growing sector under import substitution industrialisation (ISI)—has been replaced by a financialised, export-dependent model designed to serve global capital, not local workers.
Most of us grow up thinking taxes pay for everything the government does—schools, roads, hospitals, etc. We’re told that if we want better services, the government has to “raise money” through taxes. But here’s the truth: That’s not how it works.
🧵Thread🧵
The government isn’t like a household. It doesn’t need to earn money before it can spend. It creates the money, spends it into the economy and then it collects taxes afterward. So, it’s not a matter of “how will we pay for it?”—it’s “how will we manage the money we’ve created?”
This idea might sound wild, but it’s been around for a long time. In 1946, the head of the American central bank said in an article called “Taxes for Revenue Are Obsolete” that the government did not need taxes to raise money. Why? Because it could create money. What taxes were really for, he said, was to manage the economy—to control inflation and reduce inequality.