Eventually politicians will strip CDC and other public health agencies of their power, and I won't be able to argue with them.

Why?
Public health misused and abused its powers

Closing beaches
Pouring sand into outdoor skateboard parks............
🧵
Discouraging people from outdoor activities
Lying about the evidence for cloth masks in community settings
Lying about the evidence for masking outside
Not running any randomized control trials of masking in high income nations
Pushing masks on 2-year-olds in contrast with world health organization recommendations, evidence, and basic common sense
Culling animals
Using the police state to enforce lockdown

Not letting people hold their father's hand when their father dies.

Not letting people visit their mother when she's hospitalized
Closing schools

But just for poor kids who go to public school, rich kids get to go to school

Making testing companies rich by recommending unproven testing
Inventing a 6-ft distance

Enforcing stupid distances to make it hard to run school buses

Lowering the regulatory bar for vaccines
Lying about the myocarditis after the safety signal is found in Israel

Never making drug companies test lower doses in young men. Doing absolutely nothing to mitigate the risk.
Lying about natural immunity.

Repeatedly lying about it so you can force boosters on people who've already had covid, despite no evidence, and lacking biological rationale
Continuing the emergency state long after it's appropriate.

Continuing emergency powers when the emergency has passed
Vaccine passports

Discriminating against people by vaccine status.

Preventing Novak Djokovic from competing in US Open
Preventing Kyrie Irving from playing but he can watch the game.

Making children wear masks to go to the zoo in California in November 2022 to protect the animals who shouldn't be close to the kids anyway, and they're all outside anyway
Firing healthcare workers who got COVID-19 taking care of sick patients, because they didn't want to get a vaccine for the virus they had already had and cleared
Firing healthcare workers to the point that no one wants to work in healthcare anymore, and it is hard to staff
Discouraging people from getting routine health care.

Publishing propaganda in MMWR to justify your broken agenda
Funding the ecotrust dude after all the issues about where the virus is coming from.
Spending 10 billion on paxlovid without randomized data in vaccinated people
Spending billions on remdesivir when it doesn't do s***.
Spending so much money on useless tests, that faculty members quit universities to go run testing companies selling said useless tests
Using useless test to keep kids out of school.

Inventing unproven Quarantine policies to keep kids out of school
Closing Palo Alto schools, but leasing the space, so parents can drop their kids off in zoom school, wear an instructor who's an underpaid worker opens a laptop so they can take a class with their teacher.
If you stand back and consider the million things public health did to combat the pandemic, the ratio of incorrect to correct things might be 100,000 to one.
And doing all this without running a single cluster randomized trial to figure out anything. To just do it on a whim without data.
So as someone who has long believed in the value of the regulatory state, and long been a champion for increased funding of public health, if the politician asks me should we destroy the CDC, I would have to say 'yes, please and let me help you'
We have to totally destroy it, and try to build a new institution that actually uses science to guide policy, and realizes that You can never follow the science. Science can just articulate trade-offs, but all trade-offs must be decided by citizens.
Scientist advise, citizens decide

That was the mantra that public health experts did not adhere to, letting their narcissism and hubris drive policy. And somehow managing to run zero cluster randomized trials of NPIs
If you want to know about more public health failures, watch this video
Here is a sharable version of the thread
vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/p/we-need-to-s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vinay Prasad MD MPH

Vinay Prasad MD MPH Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VPrasadMDMPH

Nov 2
If you dramatically change human behavior, sever global transit and travel, massively disrupt children gathering, and have a new pathogen, it's not surprising you disrupt cold and flu like illnesses. (Temp)

But eventually they will come back. Many articles seem surprised....
It was entirely predictable that diseases kept in check by partial natural immunity, would surge in the absence of partial natural immunity
Some claim the solution is more disruption, closure, unproven non-pharmacologic interventions, but this is not the solution.

If anything, the solution is to try to pull cases forward into times where hospitals are not overwhelmed
Read 7 tweets
Oct 31
There is some bizarre desire to link Covid to cancer via p53. The study is obviously meaningless.

Yet some promotors live in a fantasy world where if we 'just masked up again' we could stop Covid 19 infections

That is not an option, sadly 🧵
The virus is too contagious. No matter what you would do, it will infect everyone. That process is almost over. And then it begins again

Best to try to have most of that infection (of older people) after vaccination rather than before.

But stopping spread is not an option
Dampening spread post vaccine can't happen. People wont stop socializing, no matter how much you fear mongering. (exhibit A - America)

They are immune to fear based messaging. (it did work better in 2020)
Read 14 tweets
Oct 31
Here is why a "blood test that screens for multiple cancers" will likely fail

There are 3 types of cancers you can find on screening
1. Cancer that will kill u no matter what
2. Cancer that will kill u, unless you cut it out (what you want to find)
3. Cancer that won't harm u🧵
To date, there is no molecular, pathologic, histologic, or omic way to tell these 3 apart.

Blood based screening for cancer might be finding #2, but prob. a lot of #1 and #3

Here is the hard part, you are often worse off for finding #1 and #3
You get a surgery to remove your primary organ, but #1 had already spread to the spine, and that spot and other metastatic spots will result in death

You just became a patient for more years
Read 9 tweets
Oct 31
During the op ed I wrote at least 5 pieces on censorship, and how social media was getting it wrong 👇👇 🧵🧵

medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 30
The most concerning part of the annual COVID19 booster is Who Decided?
Who decided based on 8 and 10 mice Ab levels, we will institute a mass booster campaign for 200+ million?

Down to 5 year olds. & Diff than Europe

The answer is political appointees
That's scary 🧵
Obviously since the White House inappropriately pressured FDA's Gruber and Krause to approve a booster in young people, against their judgment, or resign (and they choose the latter)....

Politics has run the show.

Not science

nytimes.com/2021/08/31/us/…
The Biden administration routinely announces what the FDA is going to do, and has taken the lead in setting vaccine policy

They are essentially playing doctor

These people were not selected for medical acumen

Ashish Jha got to his job from tweeting. It's all in the media....
Read 10 tweets
Oct 29
Reading this paper
It most certainly DOES NOT show mild covid leads to long term neurologic abnormalities...
In fact, the methods are likely missing the VAST MAJORITY with mild COVID
It shows that sick Vets who have a COVID diagnosis in the VET system have more billing codes 🧵
It is really concerning to me that people do not understand what this means.

If you have 100 veterans, and want to know their covid status, you should draw Ab against nucleocapsid

If you look in the VA dataset, you will not find veterans with covid, you will find...
the sickest most vulnerable vets with COVID who got tested in the VA system and have a VA test result

This is hardly the real denominator

You are probably missing mild covid 2:1, 3:1, maybe even 10:1. You are missing all the mild covid!

Many vets tough it out at home
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(