Re: @chrisgreybrexit's thread about his heroic father-in-law: in September 1939, my Hungarian great-grandfather was in London. Seeking asylum for his Jewish family.
When war broke out, his wife pleaded with him to return to her and their three daughters. Fatefully, he did.
That decision ultimately cost him his life. He died in the camps only weeks from the end of the war. My grandmother, who doted on him, never forgave her mother for that heartbreaking request.
When they were deported to Auschwitz in 1944, my grandmother, great-grandmother and two great-aunts somehow stayed together.
They remained together as they were taken on to Frankfurt-am-Main, Zillertal, Ravensbruck and Mauthausen: via being experimented on, death marches and the utterly unimaginable, which I've documented on here several times.
After the war, my gran fled Hungary and settled in London
She went on to make a quite mindblowing success of her life.
And the rest of her family? In 1956, at the outbreak of the Hungarian uprising, she arranged for them to be smuggled over the Austrian border in the dead of night.
The British Embassy in Vienna organised immediate flights to London - and they were all in jobs by the start of the following week. That's the extent of the wonders my grandmother worked for them.
All of them went on to defy the odds in all sorts of ways.
My gran and her sisters all lived into their nineties.
And they never ceased being grateful to Britain for giving them that chance; the chance to start again and remake their lives after enduring the most horrific experiences it's possible to conceive of.
But in my grandmother's sitting room in Brighton was an old picture. Of her father.
Not a day went by when she wouldn't think of him. His death at the Nazis' hands left a hole in her which could never be filled.
In the ghettos prior to their deportation, he was beaten half to death in front of her. He never recovered from that beating.
The current discourse around refugees and asylum would have been unimaginable a generation ago.
UNIMAGINABLE.
There are few things quite so disgusting as this government and its yob media pals' rampant dehumanisation of just about anyone fleeing for their lives from horror.
Dehumanisation is exactly what the Nazis did too. And exactly what the Daily Mail did throughout the 1930s.
Apparently, substantial numbers of people in Britain, Europe and the US learnt NO LESSONS AT ALL from what the Nazis did.
The same substantial numbers who blame foreigners for their own failings, their own inadequacy, and who REFUSE TO VOTE FOR INVESTMENT IN THEIR COMMUNITIES.
I don't know about anyone else - but I'm getting pretty damn sick of privileged racist arseholes without the faintest bloody idea about what refugees and asylum seekers have been through stigmatising them.
Smearing them. Judging them. Dehumanising them.
And it's only by stigmatising, smearing, judging and dehumanising them that they can treat them like some 'other' - rather than the human beings just like us they all are.
Just about every single one of us will, at some point in the past, have been a product of immigration.
Immigration is how island nations in particular progress and prosper.
Can't find a school for your child? Can't get a GP appointment? Can't find affordable housing?
So VOTE FOR INVESTMENT you absolute morons.
Worried about how the UK's had such horrifically stagnant growth ever since 2010, and the huge cuts which are coming?
That's why WE NEED IMMIGRATION, you economically illiterate Brexit-cheerleading quarter-wits.
Without it, kiss goodbye to the NHS. And pensions.
Imagine a swathe of people so miserable, so stupid, so selfish and so racist that they think immigrants or refugees with nothing are somehow responsible for their ills.
Not the government that's been in place for 12 years making disgusting political choices throughout that time.
And here's the thing.
As Angela Merkel - who actually understands the lessons of history, unlike the absolute shower running the UK - recognised: if you give people sanctuary, they will never forget it and they will love your country and make a huge contribution to it.
Again, that's a very large part of how nations like the UK or US have prospered in the past.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.
Now look at both our countries - at the Tories and the Republicans - and despair.
Look, just as much, at Israel. Which has just elected a horrific bunch of grotesque racists.
It's hard to imagine any nation so spectacularly failing to learn the lessons of history. And in Brazil, as Bolsonaro supporters cry 'coup'? Guess what flag they wave?
Israel's flag.
That's how Israel is seen by the far right around their world. As their ally in hatred and ethnonationalism.
Things only ever get worse there. Never better. Because that's what happens when a nation heads down this disgusting path.
Things may also be about to get far worse in the US - where democracy itself may be about to literally die, murdered by gun-toting, flag-waving, criminal Republicans - and in the UK, we get the most vile government doing the most repugnant things every single day.
"It's OUR fish!"
"They're YOUR immigrants!"
"We demand freedom of movement for goods, services but not people!"
Think about what that says about us. About our 'values'.
It's enough to make me throw up.
Do you know how much of Britain is built on? About 9% at most.
"Don't let them in! We're full up!"
We're not 'full up' and we're a million miles away from being 'full up'. So take your NIMBYism and shove it. Sideways.
That very same I'm alright Jack NIMBYism which has caused most of the housing crisis: which is then blamed on the poorest and most vulnerable people by morons and racists.
It's not even NIMBY any more. It's BANANA. Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone.
Absolute legions of arsehole Tory MPs desperate for the government NOT to build housing... because their arsehole constituents don't like it.
Are we being 'invaded'? We were invaded long, long ago. By a bankrupt economic ideology which does nothing but destroy everything.
And which continues to lead the UK and others to its own logical conclusion. To sneering, snarling, hateful fascism.
Change the system, get these bastards out, or pay the price.
It's not just that the Selfservatives are living up to their name as never before.
It's that they're so far over the line now they can no longer even make it out.
The modern day Tory Party? It's a cult: of Brexit, bullshit, xenophobia, hatred and unheard of levels of arrogance.
They hold the entire British public in absolute contempt.
And a significant proportion of these faceless, gutless, talentless fools genuinely believe Johnson will magically sweep all before him - and genuinely believe the public want the Gaslighter-in-Chief back!
Listen to what they keep saying: what's best "for the party".
Not the country. The party. And what they mean is: "The only thing that matters to me is my job, and I'll back whoever I think might give me one".
1. I can't see even that irredeemable shower giving Johnson enough nominations. If they do, it's the biggest two fingers up to the public it's possible to imagine.
2. Sunak will be in the top two and may not fare so badly among the members this time.
It'd only have taken a swing of about 10,000 votes for him to have beaten Truss - BEFORE all the unmitigated chaos which followed.
3. The probable run-off is Sunak v Mordaunt or Wallace. Watch the latter closely. It might well end up being him. He'd walk it among the members.
4. But in so many ways, NONE of this matters. Because:
a) The Tories are absolutely incapable of uniting under any leader. Too many factions, too many egos, too much poison
b) The economy is only going to get WORSE. A lot worse.
History, someone once said, repeats itself: first as tragedy, then as farce.
Both Britain and the Tory Party have been here before. A long, long, long time ago - but the parallels between then and now show how class-ridden, undemocratic and corrupt we've always been.
In December 1783, William Pitt the Younger, aged just 24, became Prime Minister. This followed a long period of political instability - which had encompassed the loss of the American colonies, a national disaster and humiliation.
Nobody thought this new ministry could survive.
Just as few people thought, when she became Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher would last long either. After all, wouldn't her policies bring so much misery and chaos that she'd be out after one term?
Many in her own Cabinet thought she had next to no chance.
During the first week or two of the Tory leadership race, I decided to venture over to two VERY dark corners of the internet. The comments sections of the Telegraph and Con Home.
Even by their subterranean standards, I was completely dumbstruck at what I read.
Sunak was being attacked all over the shop: specifically for being a high tax, 'socialist' Chancellor. 🙄
Meanwhile, the choice of the right wing grassroots? The dangerously out of control lunatic Kemi Badenoch - by a very long way.
And why? Because she'd slash taxes! She'd finish off the state altogether! She'd end the 'madness' of net zero!
'Madness' - aimed at ensuring future generations have any kind of habitat at all.
This was 'true conservatism'. Unlike those awful lefties Johnson and Sunak.
This clown used to be a member of the Labour Party.
Apparently, he's literally never heard of taxing the rich and investing the proceeds to grow the economy, increase the tax take and reduce the deficit sustainably.
He's literally never heard of Keynesianism or social democracy
But then, he is someone who left the Labour Party over its failure to back bombing Assad on the same side as ISIS.
Shall I repeat that?
Dan Hodges left the Labour Party because of its refusal to do what ISIS wanted.
That was the 'moderate' position in his world.
'Moderates' like Dan were fans of Cameron, thought Miliband meant a 'coalition of chaos', wanted to HELP ISIS, and think the only option for any government is to cut spending... despite austerity having been an ongoing economic and social catastrophe.
"Price controls, untargeted subsidies, or export bans are fiscally costly and lead to excess demand, undersupply, misallocation, and rationing. They rarely work.
Fiscal policy should instead aim to protect the most vulnerable through targeted and temporary transfers" - the IMF
In other words, they don't get it EITHER.
Or to put it another way: the IMF are like so many modern day economists. Who don't understand or care about the actual impact of their theories on human beings.
The 'most vulnerable' in this case means MORE THAN HALF OF THE POPULATION.
But it's really saying something that these bastards are like the voice of reason compared with the UK government - which they've again called out today.
Kwarteng will be gone within a couple of months at most.