Before proceedings begin today, Rhodes's defense counsel is raising concern about the effect of this piece of evidence on the jury in light of recent events. 🔽
https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1587946054271524864
In particular, he wants to voir dire the jury on whether they heard POTUS say yesterday:
"After the assailant entered the home asking: “Where’s Nancy? Where’s Nancy?” Those are the very same words used by the mob when they stormed the United States Capitol on January the 6th."
"After the assailant entered the home asking: “Where’s Nancy? Where’s Nancy?” Those are the very same words used by the mob when they stormed the United States Capitol on January the 6th."
As we get closer to the defense case, AUSA Nestler wants to establishe the complicated rules of the road in a five-defendant trial.
AUSA: Defendants do not have a right to cross-examine defendants or other defense witnesses unless the testimony inculpates that defendant.
AUSA: Defendants do not have a right to cross-examine defendants or other defense witnesses unless the testimony inculpates that defendant.
AUSA says they don't want Rhodes testifying and having all four co-defendants crossing him with leading questions favorable to their cases.
Cross-examining of Agent Moore resumes.
ICYMI, yesterday: A string of messages that Rhodes allegedly sent ordering Oath Keepers leaders to "Clam up" and "DELETE" incriminating messages — via Kellye SoRelle, his purported lawyer and alleged paramour. documentcloud.org/documents/2326…
ICYMI, yesterday: A string of messages that Rhodes allegedly sent ordering Oath Keepers leaders to "Clam up" and "DELETE" incriminating messages — via Kellye SoRelle, his purported lawyer and alleged paramour. documentcloud.org/documents/2326…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
