Government is arguing that CUPE Ontario called and encouraged an unlawful strike of its members and that strike happened.
Strike is defined in s. 1 of OLRA (see attached)
Section 100 of OLRA permits the OLRB to make an declaration that an unlawful strike has occurred and to "in its discretion" make any other order directing anyone to do anything to stop the unlawful strike.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Basu is addressing CUPE's argument that OLRA must be interpreted consistent with "Charter values", which includes respecting rights to collective bargaining and to strike.
He argues that Charter values includes "notwithstanding clause". And Charter values are "fraught".
- Government named CUPE-Ontario as respondent, but "CUPE Ontario" is not a union. Suspect that OLRB will permit correction here.
- CUPE denies that it called for an unlawful strike or that one is occurring.
- CUPE argues it is engaged in a political protest vs draconian legislation, which is protected expression.
- IF this protest is a 'strike', then definition of strike in OLRA is a Charter violation.
A couple of arguments I discussed in my Tweets are in the response:
1. It is not a 'strike' if the employer voluntary closes for the day. There was no workplace to go to today. Schools voluntarily closed before any action occurred.