Kate Pryde Profile picture
Nov 4 10 tweets 5 min read
@aginggleefully I know what you’re getting at—but disagree strongly.
Some of the connections we’ve made around here are valuable beyond measure.
(For instance, YOU!)
I hope we can keep and grow the networks we’ve developed here, and that IF we go elsewhere we can all reconnect there.
@aginggleefully Exactly how do you propose keeping in touch? By exchanging our other online handles and platform locations? By exchanging and storing each other’s contact info—such as email addresses—PIECEMEAL, as we did 20 years ago?
That would be inefficient and we would lose SO many contacts!
@aginggleefully Transferring our networks elsewhere is possible—but it will take TIME.
MUCH more time than the “little while longer” you and some others envision.
Already, some who have outright closed their accounts here—not even left them up with a “forwarding address”—are now hard to find.
@aginggleefully And though we circulate those old saws about anyone who REALLY wants to find us being able to do so if they’re REALLY determined, why would we WANT to make it any harder for like-minded peeps to get/stay in touch?
Especially for political organizing, as well as other purposes?
@aginggleefully I for one don’t want to go back to the old inefficient piecemeal ways of networking—where for instance you had to know what/whom you were looking for before you could find it!
A universal platform/town hall is invaluable, and this is the closest thing to that we have right now.
@aginggleefully Maybe after a while something similar—or better—will evolve elsewhere, and we (and future newcomers to activism) can all meet there. But until ONE “alternative” emerges and becomes established as the clear go-to, let’s not splinter into dozens of separate “alternative” silos!
@aginggleefully Remember—when some on the RIGHT thought this place was LEFTIST-run and controlled, righties started their own “alternative Twitter”.
But most of those people ALSO maintained a presence here, to stay accessible to each other—and STAY IN THE DEBATE.

And we should do the same now.
@aginggleefully THE ELECTION is JOB ONE right now, and that’s where our energies should go at least until it’s over.
I’m sure certain interests would LIKE us to shoot ourselves in the foot by ditching this communication tool mid-battle—AND to be distracted by the debate over whether to do so.
@aginggleefully My take:
IT’S A TRAP.
Let’s not fall for it.
For now:
EYES ON THE PRIZE.

And even after next week, let’s consider carefully and not be hasty. Go elsewhere—and give this place less of our time, clicks, etc. if we choose—but maintain a presence here.
But for now:
#EyesOnThePrize

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kate Pryde

Kate Pryde Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mutant187

Oct 25
@PamKeithFL This is questionable!
Don’t know WHAT their motive is—whether it’s as stated, or a scam to psych US into waiting until the last minute—but waiting IS a BAD IDEA!
What if people wait—then something comes up? Blizzard, car trouble, family emergency?

Best NOT to promote waiting!
@PamKeithFL The POINT of early/mail voting is to allow ample time and ways to vote, as feasible for us—and leave time to rectify any glitches.

REPUBS usually oppose early and mail voting—because these options make voting easier!
Should we let them trick US out of using all our options now?
@PamKeithFL ANOTHER POSSIBILITY:
Republicans want to reduce the early-voting and mail-voting usage stats, so they can then claim there is little demand for these options—so we might as well eliminate them (“and save the money we’ve been using to staff early voting and process the ballots”).
Read 4 tweets
Sep 16
For the ✡️ #HighHolidays
—if you belong to a congregation you love…enjoy!
If not, there are still many options.
Contact your favorite egalitarian, inclusive shul and see if you can take part in services—in person or virtually—for whatever you can pay without financial hardship.
THIS THREAD will list congregations and groups that offer equal-participation #HighHolidays services, in person and/or virtual, without set “ticket” prices—or at least with the option to give “another amount” (just send it in; no humiliating negotiations or discussion required).
In these times, who needs the tsuris? Not us!
(But enough of that argument. For now).

SOME congregations do it right: they offer access to services that reflect the best of Jewish values—the values we really want for our families and ourselves—on a “give what you can” basis.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 14
@danielgibber Should making a living and working toward justice be the focus of most of our time?
For most people, yes.
Is religion a supplement and inspiration—but NOT how we use the bulk of our time?
For most people, yes.
It’s no sin to live mostly in THIS world.
After all, who PUT us here?
@danielgibber If some choose to sideline themselves from the public discourse for 22+ DAYS—with elections only 54 days away—be my guest.
Those who do so hurt only their own interests and causes.

Yes, the High Holy Days call for meditation and 2-3 full DAYS in “timeout”.
Not 3 whole WEEKS+.
@danielgibber Maybe the more privileged individuals and groups among us can deputize/hire PR firms, campaigns, and other institutions to speak FOR them while they’re on a 3-week “hiatus” from public speech.
We grassroots activists cannot.
Social media are among our main tools for being heard.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 7
@F125AXer @bungarsargon But which courses of study “have limited utility towards better paying careers”?
Virtually all those who succeed in every field—journalism, academia, writing, the arts—DO have elite degrees in relevant subjects.
The degree is a prerequisite for—though not a guarantee of—success.
@F125AXer @bungarsargon Why should a student with an interest in and aptitude for a given field not have access to the academic prerequisites to work in that field, just for lack of parents who can pay out of pocket?
And why should our political and cultural leaders be drawn only from the upper class?
@F125AXer @bungarsargon It’s elitist for people who HAVE good careers in journalism, writing, teaching, the arts, etc.—which careers they wouldn’t have without the liberal arts educations they had—to criticize working/middle class kids for aspiring to those careers even if they must borrow to get there.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 28
@Josef_Jones @RabbiErin @JewishWonk No, they’re shaming themselves.

Apparently, they just don’t want to do what it takes to make themselves manifestly welcoming to those—the vast majority in recent generations—who can’t afford anything like the standard sticker prices and don’t want to grovel for “charity rates”.
@Josef_Jones @JewishWonk And yes, maybe other denominations—LDS and Scientology—do require specific “donation” amounts. But most churches—and Orthodox shulim—don’t.
And the regressive-tax “% of income” policy—which is some liberal shulims’ stab at “doing it better”—is still a hardship for the non-rich.
@Josef_Jones @JewishWonk What’s more, most of the congregations that think requiring 1%-3% of income is an “improvement” over the fixed-price dues model still “ask” specific large sums for Hebrew school, assorted fees, etc. And still require concurrent (paid) membership and fees along with Hebrew school.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 28
@Josef_Jones @RabbiErin @JewishWonk Yes—there are expenses.
Building, utilities, clergy, teachers, etc.
SAME AS AT EVERY HOUSE OF WORSHIP.
Orthodox, Baptist, Methodist, Unitarian; all have similar bills to pay.
But only liberal shulim think they must require a specific (and large) sum of money—or proof of poverty.
@Josef_Jones @RabbiErin @JewishWonk And it’s NOT just that members of more traditionalist congregations feel “obligated” to give generously and members of liberal congregations don’t.
Liberal churches (Unitarian, UC of C, etc.) are just as mellow—“give as you can; no questions asked”—as are fundamentalist churches.
@Josef_Jones @RabbiErin @JewishWonk And it works fine for them.
So “liberal” vs. “traditionalist” or “fundamentalist” (or “more hardcore theist”) DOESN’T explain the difference in fundraising policies.
So what does?
Are liberal Jewish congregations saying that non-Orthodox Jews can’t be trusted to give generously?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(