Nowhere in this story is there an explanation for why NBC News reported these details. Did someone lie to the reporter? If so, who? Did HE lie? If so, why?
Details, details. The important thing is that we noticed, which makes us "conspiracy theorists."
Now that Twitter's "curation" team is gone (the morons who spun the news to fit in a sidebar blurb), how will @NBCNews explain pulling this news story about Paul Pelosi? I'm guessing they won't. They'll just stonewall until everybody stops asking. deadline.com/2022/11/nbc-ne…
"Editor's note: This piece has been removed from publication because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
In what way? This sort of language is usually reserved for a reporter editorializing. What did @Miguelnbc say that fell below standards?
Now @NBCNews has completely scrubbed this video because it doesn't meet their "reporting standards." Why? Which fact did he get wrong? And why does it keep happening in this story?
First DePape was in his underwear, then he wasn't. There was a third person in the house, then there wasn't. Now this. You're not a conspiracy theorist to ask why this keeps happening.
But no, the journos just jumped right to "MAGA did it." Because they were told to by the Dems.
The thing about conspiracy theories is... conspiracies exist! That's why we have a word for them. Sometimes it's true.
If somebody censors you, lies to you, lies about you, and generally treats you like a mortal enemy for disagreeing with him, are you supposed to feign concern when he's fired? jimtreacher.substack.com/p/twitter-lays…
There was a time when I would’ve sympathized with the people getting laid off from Twitter. That time was before I joined Twitter. jimtreacher.substack.com/p/twitter-lays…