I'm playtesting #Mastodon explainers. Let me know if this makes sense please. :)
Imagine if your gmail account meant you could ONLY email gmail users. That would be silly! Especially if you don't want Google to have all your data. So why are social networks like that? (1/?)
Mastodon isn't a platform- it's a protocol for anyone to run a platform that connects to others. So e.g., I'm on an "instance" set up by a prof friend, but my feed (like your Facebook feed or your Twitter feed) includes content from anyone I follow across any instance. (2/?)
Because if Facebook or Twitter go out of business tomorrow, or you decided to leave, you'd lose everything. But imagine instead if you decided to leave Twitter and go to Facebook instead, you could take your network with you--and also still talk to anyone still on Twitter. (3/?)
Or another option is you and your friends can start your own social network where you can create your own policies while still interacting with anyone on other platforms. Your data and your network aren't owned by a giant company - it can be owned by someone you trust. (4/?)
A lot of folks are getting hung up on choosing an instance. One thing to know is that even though you do have to pick one to start (because you need somewhere to be!) it doesn't matter as much as you might think because you can follow whoever you want. (5/?)
There seems to be a common misconception of Mastodon instances as "silos"--because I'm on the "hci academics" instance those are the only people I'm talking to. Not true! I see people from dozens of instances on my feeds and don't even need to know what instance they're on. (6/?)
There are actually different Mastodon feeds you can view--one that is based on the people you follow across any instance, one based on people in your instance, and one based on folks across lots of instances who are engaged with by people you engage with. (7/?)
It's also not hard to switch Mastodon instances, and you can take your followers with you, so if you decide you made the wrong choice or you find a better one later, it might not be a big deal. So I recommend just choosing one (even at random) to try it out, to start. (8/?)
Think of a Mastodon instance as like, an after school club or marching band or something at your school. You can't control who's in it, but you do know when you choose to join the general types of people who are in it, but... (9/?)
Even though you can still be friends with whoever you want at your school, you know you'll see the folks in your club more than random people you don't know, and you're also more likely to meet people who are friends with people in your club. (10/?)
But also if you quit the club and join another club, you don't have to stop being friends with them, and you certainly don't have to stop being friends with everyone else at the school. Because like, quitting a club shouldn't dissolve all your friendships. :) (11/?)
This is a great explainer on picking an instance, using apps, the nuts and bolts of Mastodon (and also addressing some common misconceptions): fedi.tips/how-to-use-mas… (12/13)
To be clear: I am NOT saying that Mastodon is a solution to all our social media problems. I actually think that it creates a whole new slew of problems and some of them are going to be big ones.
But I think it's very good to be exploring other ways of doing things. (13/13? ☺️)
@threadreaderapp
unroll please
so I can post this on mastodon ;)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ok so
it appears that the new strategy for advocating for changes to Twitter's content moderation policy is to do things that directly impact Twitter's owner
this seems... not ideal
Also I've been thinking a lot lately about how it's harder to imagine harms to people not like yourself. This is a particularly good example of not seeing a potential harm (and thinking about how to mitigate it) until it impacts you.
I think this represents a common misconception about Mastodon! The entire point of federated social media is that it isn't a silo. On Twitter you are in a Twitter silo. On a Mastodon instance you can interact with anyone on ANY instance.
That said, right now Mastodon *feels* like a silo because there aren't many people there - so yep, it isn't a global community. But neither was Twitter at the beginning. If we can only be on social media where everyone else *already* is, then we'll be held hostage forever.
To be clear, I think the "global community" part is really important for scientists, which is why I'm not leaving Twitter right now. (But I would very much like to be *able* to.) This is my quote from the article that precipitated this discussion:
The ML ethics team at Twitter has done amazing work. e.g. they were *auditing their own systems* and *publishing papers about it* and generally making me feel better about everything happening there.
Anyone should know by now that firing your ethics leads is not a good look.
I've been completely baffled by everything happening the past few days and now I'm just convinced that Elon Musk is doing a speed run for destroying a tech company.
Two years ago we published a paper about online community migration, and I think the findings and recommendations are relevant to what I'm seeing right now on Twitter. Especially the barriers and challenges to relocating (and maybe some solutions). 🧵cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/CSCW…
Here are some bad things that are likely to happen when people pack their bags and leave a platform: (1) content loss (which *might* be less of a big deal on a social platform like Twitter compared to a content creation platform like YouTube)
(2) fragmented communities - when some people move and some people don’t, the community necessarily splinters, or even “disintegrates” all together (3) social changes - culture and norms of a community will inevitably shift in reaction to the broader culture of the new platform
"The goal of a [program committee] has become to destroy rather than to develop." sigbed.org/2022/08/22/the…
Please bear with me; I'm about to compare the toxic culture of rejection in computer science peer review to a high school orchestra competition. 🧵
A friend told me a story about a low income high school orchestra participating in a competition. A cellist who doesn't own her own cello & had never had a private lesson started a solo. After 1 minute a judge (a college music prof) said "you can stop, I don't need to hear more."
First of all, what an unnecessary, jerk move. And it wouldn't have been surprising if that girl never touched a cello again.
But the point is, competitions with a couple of "winners" and mostly "losers" makes us look for losers. If we find a reason to reject, we can stop there.
A TikTokker (@ curt.skelton) has convinced a *significant* number of people that he’s actually been AI this entire time and I think this is an interesting window into people’s perceptions of the capabilities of AI. (This video has 12 million views.) 🤖🧵
I was always surprised by how many people thought that the “I forced a bot” things were real, but on the other hand, we’re certainly a farther along in creative AI than we were five years ago.
Like, AI is currently not capable of creating anything like curt.skelton’s full TikTok account, but on the other hand I did “force” DALL-E to make me a fake 22 year old guy who looks like the love child of Matt Smith and Conan O’Brien.