Things we have learned about @Sflecce and his war against @CUPEOntario from the #OLRB hearings:
1. Lecce acknowledged he lied about educator workers seeking a 50% wage increase - surprise #leccelies
2. The legislation to invoke the NWS clause was drafted well in advance of job
1. Lecce acknowledged he lied about educator workers seeking a 50% wage increase - surprise #leccelies
2. The legislation to invoke the NWS clause was drafted well in advance of job
action - showing he never had any intention of bargaining in good faith. This was all part of a plan to break education unions
3. Lecce can invoke PRIVILEGE to avoid testifying while stripping worker's RIGHTS
4. Gov't lawyers argued that asynchronous learning at home is harmful
3. Lecce can invoke PRIVILEGE to avoid testifying while stripping worker's RIGHTS
4. Gov't lawyers argued that asynchronous learning at home is harmful
to students, and an inferior way to learn, while their client continues to insist all secondary students complete TWO online, asynchronous courses to graduate.
5. The gov't doesn't want to discuss if worker rights are violated, they just want to be told their actions were LEGAL
5. The gov't doesn't want to discuss if worker rights are violated, they just want to be told their actions were LEGAL
CONCLUSION: @Sflecce manufactured a crisis & used the NWS clause as a union-busting tactic & a way to justify the introduction of vouchers in the future (see @brianlilley article which is clearly a Con trial balloon).
Despite the rhetoric this is NOT about keeping kids in class
Despite the rhetoric this is NOT about keeping kids in class
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
