(Pinging to un-shadowban the thread.)

If anyone reading this has Elon's or Linda's ear, please forward it to them!

@elonmusk, @lindayaX, @support & @premium, PLEASE end 𝕏's SHADOWBANNING of replies! What good is a tweetstorm if we can't find the 2nd tweet while viewing the 1st?


Also, @elonmusk, @lindayaX & @support, @premiu, PLEASE put a stop to the avalanche of porn-ad "fake engagement spam" on 𝕏.

Here are 100 examples of 𝕏 accounts with fake profiles, used solely for advertising porn sites, all of which I saw in my feed and reported & blocked over roughly 48 hours. (Check my block list for hundreds more.) They're all easily identified by the pornography links in the profiles, yet Twitter/𝕏 has not even disabled many of the accounts:


I did not pay for a 🟦blue checkmark🟦 to get bombarded with porn-ad spam.

If I try to directly mention more than a few of the fake profiles, Twitter complains: "The text of your post exceeds the number of allowed @ mentions." So I've stripped the "@" from most of these:
@Kristen499030 @Cheryl761157239 @Christy30634338 @Claudia1576846 @Kara64616027244 @Aaliyah83242495 @Paty799042 @Pamela116899698 Naomi1257622117 Naomi7642310808 Adrienne167057 Naomi0177459766 Mila16595386122 Mila16551252909 Laura312368174 Laura5457647412 Liz131282514359 Amy162447836271 Amy296335838232 Rica137288 Rhonda77327239 Renee1912291623 Rosa39198249062 Sabrina1162852 Ryan08989677107 Sabrina25065601 Roberta842445 Samanth04129508 Samanth88094951 Sara99283412066 Sarah292649 Andrea1146566 Sejal336534 Shannon21995401 Shannon29060570 brooklyn97085 Andrea1167203 Oscar0066332528 Rob479079418443 Shannon77069605 Shannon77754516 Shannon82162120 Shelly286816698 Shelly298337310 Lucy05662887743 Sherry753675658 Sheila518813426 Sheena551350186 Shawn9724724568 Sherry959070288 Angela088028292 Stacey115174 Ellie2074174205 Stephan20439268 Penelop71292214 Penelop58043498 Penelop52797551 Susan5923810338 Steve4676198240 Donna0144726518 Theresa5132497 Thelma285812 Donna6260551050 Tiffany79162893 Tim619912857565 Maria2541887922 Jennifer376848 Cynthia97629988 Julie5002346258 Jamie1743184449 Mariam850057710 Dorine144800 Lynn1176926853 Maria752774673 Kara00919827506 Jutamas678716 Amanda10286121 Amanda160070688 Karen9451863212 Karen6416165988 Amanda074116923 Alyssa845299054 Allison646266 Allison632587 Alison890556571 Alisha023388874 Alicia1342164 Alicia1342138 Alicia1332098 Alicia1319696 Alexis823038372 Alex92740111375 Zoey136362 Adam22592295798 Adam55498197045 Alyssa1986873 Angela872236973 Angela535054384 Mila80293315871 Zoey110688
sealevel.info/Twitter-X_porn…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

Jan 23, 2025
1/4. Rising CO2 levels improve plants' water use efficiency and drought resilience, through reduced stomatal conductance. Simply put, plants need to process less air to get the carbon they need for growth, and thus they lose less water to transpiration.
x.com/ncdave4life/st…

That's one of the reasons that catastrophic famines no longer happen. For all of of human history, until recently, famine was one of the great scourges of mankind: the "Third Horseman of the Apocalypse." But widespread famines are fading from living memory, and rising atmospheric CO2 concentration is one of the reasons for that.

That's a very, very Big Deal. For comparison:

● COVID-19 killed about 0.1% of the world's population
● The catastrophic 1918 flu pandemic killed about 2%
● WWII killed 2.7% of the world's population
● But the nearly-worldwide drought and famine of 1876-78 killed about 3.7% of the world's population.
@Panta_Rhei06 @simonmaechling --

2/4. Improved water use efficiency and drought resilience are especially beneficial in arid regions, like the Sahel, which is one of the reasons that region of Africa is "greening" even faster than most other places.
Image
3/4. I asked ChatGPT about that benefit of CO2 emissions and rising CO2 levels:

"With reference to the agronomy literature, quantify how elevated CO2 helps plants use water more efficiently, and increases crops' drought resilience, by reducing stomatal conductance and water loss through transpiration."

ChatGPT replied with a very good answer:

In agronomy, the effects of elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and drought resilience are extensively studied. One of the key mechanisms through which elevated CO2 levels improve water use efficiency is by reducing stomatal conductance and, consequently, water loss through transpiration.

Stomata are small pores on the surface of plant leaves that regulate gas exchange, including the uptake of CO2 for photosynthesis and the release of water vapor through transpiration. When CO2 levels are elevated, plants can maintain the same or higher rate of photosynthesis while reducing stomatal conductance. This reduction in stomatal conductance leads to a decrease in water loss through transpiration without significantly affecting CO2 uptake, resulting in improved water use efficiency.

Several studies have quantified the effect of elevated CO2 on stomatal conductance and transpiration. For example, a meta-analysis published in 2013 (Kimball et al., 2013) found that under elevated CO2 levels, stomatal conductance decreased by an average of 22%, while transpiration decreased by only 17%. This indicates that plants under elevated CO2 levels were able to reduce water loss more efficiently than they reduced CO2 uptake, leading to an overall improvement in water use efficiency.

Improvements in water use efficiency due to elevated CO2 levels can increase plants' drought resilience by allowing them to maintain adequate hydration during periods of water scarcity. This can be particularly beneficial in arid and semi-arid regions where water availability is limited.

Overall, the literature suggests that elevated CO2 levels can improve water use efficiency in plants by reducing stomatal conductance and water loss through transpiration, which can enhance their resilience to drought conditions.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 12, 2025
1/6》 Marcus, please tell me that you're not fooled by a fake "study" of a three-day-old event, from a climate industry propaganda outlet. Do you know how long real studies take?

This is the real global trend:
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@Marcusgibson @WeatherProf 2/6》 NASA measures it from MODIS satellites. They show a decreasing trend in fires.
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145421/…
archive.ph/WfDJh
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/90493/r…
@Marcusgibson @WeatherProf 3/6》 The main factors affecting fires are land management and forestry practices.
phys.org/news/2022-11-1…
forestpolicypub.com/2021/07/30/gri…
Global warming has negligible impact on wildfires.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 11, 2025
1/8. Gov. Newsom's press release falsely blames "a hotter, drier world." In fact, the world is warming only very slightly & slowly, and it hasn't gotten at all drier. Here're the facts:
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
As you can see from the graph, the fraction of the globe in drought has decreased slightly, not increased.

Oh, and BTW, NCA4 (circa 2018) estimated that global average temperatures have risen only 1.14 ±0.13°C since the 1800s, and the warming is disproportionately at chilly high latitudes.Image
2/8. Also, higher CO2 levels greatly reduce drought impacts, by making plants more drought-resistant and water-efficient, through reduced stomatal conductance. That's very beneficial in arid regions, like the Sahel & much of California. Here's an article.
web.archive.org/web/2017061915…
That's is one of the reasons that region of Africa is "greening" even faster than most other places.

@NewScientist reported the "remarkable environmental turnaround," including a “quite spectacular regeneration of vegetation,” and "a 70 per cent increase in yields of local cereals such as sorghum and millet in one province in recent years."
@WeatherProf 3/8. National Geographic @NatGeo also wrote about it.
web.archive.org/web/2009080201…

sealevel.info/Owen2009_Sahar…
Read 9 tweets
Oct 10, 2024
1/8》Doc wrote, "You’re not going to change my mind."

Please do not be impervious to evidence, like trillionofcells. That would make me sad.Image
2/8》Doc wrote, "Wasn’t Gleick cleared of any wrongdoing?"

No, he was not cleared. That was disinformation from The Grauniad:
x.com/ncdave4life/st…

In fact, Gleick eventually admitted the identity theft, and disseminating the forgery & the stolen documents (though only after he was caught & publicly identified).

I can see that you didn't read my article about it. You should:
sealevel.info/Peter_Gleick_D…
3/8》Gleick never admitted being the forger, but there can be no doubt of that, either.

It was the incongruous appearance of his name in the document, with the strangely flattering description of him as a "high-profile climate scientist," in a document which said NOTHING positive about ANY other climate activists, which first drew Steve Mosher's attention to Gleick. But it was the idiosyncrasies of Gleick's own writing style, found in the forged document, which Mosher mostly discussed, when explaining why he believed Gleick wrote it.

Mosher explained it, at length, in a series of blog comments, beginning here:
rankexploits.com/musings/2012/t…

Note that that was all BEFORE Gleick confessed to being the person who had impersonated the Heartland Board Member to steal the other documents. THAT iced it: there's no question that Gleick was the forger.

(BTW, Mosher used to be with Berkeley Earth.)
Read 9 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
1/8. The IPCC authors expect  a worsening trend. No such trend is actually detectable, so far.

In fact, here's a paper about the downward  trend in hurricane destructiveness, tho I suspect the decrease might be a fluctuation rather than a durable trend.
nature.com/articles/ncomm…
2/8. The IPCC authors are sly. They know hurricanes & other tropical cyclones aren't worse, but they dodge & weave to avoid admitting it. Here's a tricky quote from AR6:

"It is likely that the global proportion of Category 3–5 tropical cyclone instances has increased over the past four decades."

ref: ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1…
3/8. That's a textbook illustration of Chesterton's point:

"Falsehood is never so false as when it is very nearly true."

It's "spin." It is calculated deception without QUITE lying.

Look at that graph again:

(Updated version: )climatlas.com/tropical/globa…Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 14, 2024
@JamesFaris_ & @BusinessInsider, here's reality:

Hurricanes and other tropical cyclones:


tl;dr: Hurricanes are not worsening.

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
climatlas.com/tropical/globa…Image
Tornadoes:


tl;dr: Tornadoes are not worsening.

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
climateataglance.com/wp-content/upl…Image
Droughts & floods:


tl;dr: Droughts & floods are not worsening.



sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitor…
sealevel.info/US_percentage_…Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(