It was always politically contrived BS that a GOP-controlled Congress would cut off "aid" to Ukraine because Kevin McCarthy made a stray comment suggesting he opposed a "blank check." This means nothing -- even ardently pro-Ukraine Dems now say they agree with McCarthy's comment
GOP candidate for Pennsylvania's 17th congressional district told me he had not yet "looked into" the whole issue of US policy in Ukraine. Just hadn't found the time -- so couldn't articulate any real position one way or another. That's the high caliber of GOP thinking on display
Just days before an election where he's running to wield war appropriations authority on behalf of Pennsylvania citizens, this GOP candidate (Jeremy Shaffer) claims almost total ignorance about one of the central issues he'll soon have to vote on in Congress. Inspiring stuff
Even in the case of high-profile GOP candidates who've been relentlessly painted by the media as somehow "opposed to aid for Ukraine" -- it's another load of BS. Here's a previously unreported October 13 quote from JD Vance affirming his *support* for sending US arms to Ukraine
We've seen this all before. Specifically, we saw it in the 2006 midterm elections, almost verbatim. Don't delude yourself
Fiona Hill, the superstar witness from Trump's first impeachment hearing on the eternal necessity of arming Ukraine, was asked last week whether GOP would actually cut off "aid." She assured everyone that their campaign rhetoric does not match what's happening "behind the scenes"
While the media fixates on outlier GOP personalities like Marjorie Taylor Greene, the vast bulk of the GOP caucus will be comprised of under-the-radar individuals like 42-year incumbent Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) -- who is lobbying for the US to somehow prosecute and imprison Putin
If the GOP wins majorities tonight, it should be underscored that GOP candidates spent the entire campaign declining to take any substantive position on Ukraine war policy, thanks to a deliberately obfuscatory talking point strategy coordinated by the national party committees
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Local newspaper reports that by early afternoon yesterday, more than 35 polling places throughout Luzerne County, PA had *run out of paper* and voters were turned away. Current tally shows Oz leading Fetterman in the county, 53% to 44%
County Council member Brian Thorton said: "Hundreds if not thousands of voters left the polls today due to the ineptness of our election bureau." Election Board member Alyssa Fusaro said: "I'm at a loss for words. I am upset. I am angry. It's a disenfranchisement of voters."
Something tells me that because Democrats won the marquee races in Pennsylvania, and because Luzerne is a Republican-leaning county, we're not going to hear very many dramatic doom-saying proclamations about how Democracy Was Destroyed
Congressman Andy Kim (D-NJ) is in a tight re-election race, but still just took out some time to answer a few foreign policy questions like a relatively normal human. This is maddeningly rare, so I give him genuine credit
I asked Kim some reasonably probing questions on Ukraine war policy and he answered them agreeably, without throwing a fit, running away, or having any sort of crazed meltdown. This is in stark contrast with many of his colleagues, both Dem and GOP. Just calling it like I see it
Kim answered the questions using what were clearly his own individual thoughts and reasoning, and not just DCCC talking points (which I can spot from a mile away). Whether or not I personally “agree” with his answers is irrelevant here; I can recognize who takes the job seriously
These people are unbelievable. The GOP candidate for NJ’s seventh congressional district, Tom Kean Jr., suddenly turned into a complete mute and ran into his car when I tried to ask him a simple question about foreign policy
I introduced myself to his staff. Once the campaign event was over, they pretended like they’d help to facilitate an interview. Went up to Kean, and then entire operation launched into an emergency extrication protocol. These people behave like partially sentient, paranoid robots
Last weekend I had a similarly ridiculous interaction with Kean’s opponent, the Democratic incumbent Congressman Tom Malinowski. There is very little partisan difference in the ridiculous behavior of these candidates
The audio clip of @Malinowski accusing me of working for the Russian government because I asked him a very simple question about a piece of legislation he co-sponsored is embedded in the article for your convenience
Seems fairly ominous that a sitting member of Congress would just randomly hurl fact-free accusations that a US citizen is a subversive paid functionary of a hostile foreign government seen as the chief geopolitical enemy of the US
This crazed behavior is so “normalized” that Malinowski’s outburst will barely even register as a blip. If pressed, most journalists would probably even come up with a way to cast blame on *me* somehow, rather than the slandering Congressman
At a recent campaign event, I asked Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-NJ) if the bill he sponsored to designate Russia a "state sponsor of terrorism" would abrogate the prospect of any future diplomatic relations with Russia. He replied by accusing me of working for the Russian government
Malinowski doesn't have the portfolio of a typical House member. Above all he's a product of the DC foreign policy complex, namely its crusading liberal interventionist wing -- drawn from his days running the "democracy and human rights" policy briefs at the State Department
Wikipedia has become a joke. Main evidence cited for why the GOP gubernatorial nominee in Illinois is "far-right" -- he "supports a statewide ban on abortion except in cases where the mother's life is in danger." Disagree all you want, but that's just a mainline GOP position
The term "far-right" (or "far-left," for that matter) used to connote some fringe, extreme position that was well outside the mainstream. It's now been retrofitted for commonly-held positions. Polls generally show Bailey's position reflects around 40% of GOP voters nationwide
Based on figures from the 2020 election, this translates to approximately 30 million Americans holding a position on abortion that reflects the one espoused by Bailey. Is it a majoritarian position nationwide? No -- but it's also not fringe as suggested by the term "far-right"