jonathan(love)wu Profile picture
Nov 8, 2022 33 tweets 10 min read Read on X
FTX was the world's 3rd largest crypto exchange.

Today it's said to be insolvent and in the midst of an acquisition by Binance.

Here's everything you need to know about Alameda Research and the collapse of FTX:

👇
Troubled crypto exchange @FTX_Official has faced severe liquidity issues in the past few days and has now agreed to terms its primary competitor and investor, @binance.

It's hard to understate how big a deal this is.

Less than a week ago, on November 2nd, CoinDesk broke a story claiming to have acquired Alameda Research's balance sheet.

It showed a damning view of the relationship between Alameda, a hedge fund, and FTX, an exchange.

coindesk.com/business/2022/…
The balance sheet's accuracy was subsequently confirmed by Alameda's CEO, Caroline Ellison.

So why was this a big deal and how did it result in one billionaire acquiring another billionaire's company and the entire crypto market going into free-fall?

Alameda is FTX founder and billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried's first venture, a wildly successful crypto hedge fund he founded after getting his start arbitraging the Japanese Bitcoin premium:

forbes.com/advisor/invest…
Alameda pivoted to becoming a market maker after arbitrage opportunities dried up, making massive sums employing quantitative trading strategies.

It earned a reputation for exceptional returns and a less sterling reputation for quietly dumping on retail:

FTX was in fact founded *after* Alameda, as a platform "for traders, by traders."

By its own measures FTX is the 3rd or 4th biggest exchange in the world.

And since its inception, there has been wild speculation on the relationship between the entities. Image
It doesn't help that in its early days, Alameda was the first market maker for FTX, giving the exchange the liquidity it needed to get off the ground.

The crux of this current crisis is a narrative violation surrounding that relationship.
The prevailing narrative of FTX-Alameda had been one of brazen corruption:

FTX gives Alameda priority orderflow, allowing its sister hedge fund to front-run other traders.

Taking a few privileged basis points on the 3rd largest exchange would be a perpetual money machine.
But FTX isn't Alameda's data source.

FTX is Alameda's piggy bank.

Sam uses a highly profitable exchange as a source of capital for a wildly profitable trading operation.
In a moment of foreshadowing, Sam tells David Rubenstein about Alameda's early days:

"We were cobbling together credit agreements."

It must be wildly frustrating to have a winning strategy but no capital to deploy.

FTX was invented to solve that issue.

Let's return to Alameda's balance sheet:

The incriminating revelation from Coindesk was that a plurality of Alameda's assets ($5.8 billion of the $14.6 billion reported) were in FTX's own exchange token, $FTT.

A large majority of the rest were in Solana ecosystem tokens.
As with other exchange tokens, owning and staking $FTT offers certain benefits to traders on FTX's exchange:

- discounted trading fees
- access to airdrops
- free withdrawals

And "VIP access."

ftx.com/ftt
Another key to $FTT's design?

1/3 of FTX's own trading revenue was used to purchase and burn $FTT supply (the equivalent of retiring shares).

Sam himself promoted the weekly $FTT buy from his personal account:

Image
At the same time, $FTT had remarkably low circulating liquidity relative to Alameda and FTX's holdings.

In other words: even if Alameda wanted to sell the $5.8B of $FTT it had, there wouldn't be enough buyers:

Alameda's holdings represented 2-3x $FTT's circulating supply!
This "low float, high FDV" strategy is worth touching on, because it applies to other tokens on Alameda's balance sheet, most in the Solana ecosystem ($SRM, $OXY, $MAPS).

$MAPS for instance has a circulating cap of $5m to $1.1 BILLION fully diluted: ImageImage
Sam actually cynically describes this exact token dynamic to @matt_levine on an Odd Lots episode hosted by @TheStalwart!

It's like he's showing us his gameplan, not only for farming and dumping crypto yield, but executing FTX's strategy:

Now the pieces are in place for FTX and Alameda to collude while retaining a legal and legitimate-seeming arms-length relationship, all using $FTT as the lynchpin:
Here's how it works:

- FTX creates $FTT
- Alameda buys or premines $FTT at super low price
- FTX pumps $FTT
- Alameda posts $FTT back to FTX as collateral, borrowing "real" assets from FTX's customer deposits
Both entities get to show auditors they have legitimate credit agreements and claim a genuine arms-length relationship.

That's how the circular piggy bank facilitates the transfer of customer funds out of FTX and into Alameda's prop trading business.

All while looking legit.
So how does this all break?

Well, the low float and constant buy pressure from FTX means the only thing that could make $FTT go down is if there were some huge, exogenous $FTT sale.

And this is where CZ comes in.
Two days ago, Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance, announced he was selling all of Binance's $FTT holdings, worth $500+ million.

I'll let the rampant speculation fly as to why, and what he knew, but he did it, citing "recent revelations."

Caroline from Alameda then offered to purchase the FTT OTC for $22 to reduce price impact.

A strange move to telegraph a price level, given she could have bought at any price lower.

To which CZ politely declined.

Again a strange move, given he could have sold $FTT higher.

Occam's razor would say the goal was therefore to sink $FTT's price. And sink it did.

Sell pressure against FTT pushed against the stated $22 level,
and defense of the FTT "peg" at $22 fell around 8pm EST on November 7th.

By morning on the 8th, FTX had paused all withdrawals of user funds. Image
Before the end, Alameda and friendly-to-FTX entities scrambled to facilitate customer withdrawals and preserve confidence.

@FTX_Official tweeted memes.

SBF stepped in to assert FTX's solvency:
The fear that Alameda's shoddy balance sheet was commingled with FTX's led to a liquidity crisis and ultimately to today's offer by CZ to acquire the exchange.

So, that's it, right?
But then--why defend the $22 number?

Because Alameda was clearly a debtor to entities other than FTX.

If it's just an agreement between kissing cousins, who cares?

But Alameda was also a counterparty to failed crypto banks Voyager and Blockfi:

It's perhaps clear now why Sam was so intent on bailing out failed crypto lenders over the summer:

They needed to defend the solvency of their own banks. And at the time, FTX had more than enough liquidity to do so.

Now there's a seeming multi-billion dollar hole at FTX, and Sam, the previous lender of last resort, has had to turn to CZ for help.

There is a new king in crypto.
In a year of turmoil the last 24 hours have been the worst thing that has happened for the crypto space, by orders.

It underscores the need again for transparent, overcollateralized systems that can deleverage in an orderly manner.

It ironically underscores the need for crypto.
tl;dr

- CZ dumps $FTT
- Alameda faces external margin calls, looks to FTX for liquidity
- FTX depositors have withdrawn; piggy bank is broken
- FTX's assets are loans Alameda can't repay, against real customer liabilities
- FTX in the hole for billions
- CZ buys FTX
If you got something out of this, shoot me a follow: @jonwu_

Stay safe out there 🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jonathan(love)wu

jonathan(love)wu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonwu_

Aug 5
It seems unintuitive that a small 25 basis point interest rate hike in Japan would spike all risk assets, including tonight's -20% $ETH candle.

But you need to understand the way the carry trade works:

It's a leveraged unwinding.
The quick explanation of the carry trade is borrow at 0 rate and invest in something with higher than 0 expected returns:

1. borrow Yen for nothing
2. buy an asset outside Japan that yields more than nothing
3. ???
4. profit
The same behavior happened during the ZIRP era.

Take a margin loan out against your equities at a 2% variable rate and buy an AirBnB with it that yields 7%.

7% - 2% = 5% of free money, right?! ...right? Image
Read 18 tweets
May 9
Making an announcement soon? Don't hire a PR agency.

Definitely not through Series A, and maybe not ever.

You can execute PR internally with a junior resource without having to pay a $50K / month retainer.

Here are the basics in <5 minutes (bookmark this):
First, I take it when we're talking about public relations, we mean just the part that means "relationships with journalists" and not marketing or social media or "comms."

So to understand PR, you have to understand journalism and what makes something newsworthy.
Journalists are typically underpaid and overworked.

They enter the business for noble reasons (truth seeking, justice, accountability) but are constantly pushed to act against those ideals in order to drive ratings and views.
Read 19 tweets
Apr 9
Switching into crypto is one of the most asymmetric things you can do for your career.

Why? There's a low-status moat around it.

Cross the moat and you'll experience less competition, more career acceleration, and highly asymmetric opportunities:
I'll start with a story about low-status moats:

When I was in business school I attended an annual real estate conference.

Investors and developers would come and give advice on breaking into real estate development or real estate private equity.
Every year they'd answer the same two questions:

1) "Where do you think we are in the real estate cycle?"
2) "What advice would you give students trying to break into the industry?"
Read 19 tweets
Mar 22
Hearing from a few teams who are scrambling to get a marketing strategy in place before we go parabolic.

You're fine. If you're struggling with narrative and positioning here's what to do in the next 30 days.

Plus 1 thing you absolutely should NOT do:
1) Founders: start tweeting every single weekday.

Four single posts, one long post.

No excuses. Drop whatever it is you're doing, stare at the screen, get it done. Marketing leaders: literally sit next to your CEO and encourage them.

Pat them on the head. Give them treats.
An A++ personal feed should look varied, with some mix of:
- explainers
- insights / "takes"
- shilling your project
- media (video, pictures)
- retweets of your partners & ecosystem

If you are just doing 1 content vertical, challenge yourself to vary it up. Do one type a day.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 13
I've talked to 50+ crypto projects in the last 10 days looking to hire a CMO or Head of Marketing.

They're not going to have an easy time.

Here's why hiring an all-star marketing leader won't fix your problems:
Before we even get to what a CMO does, let's talk about how hard they are to find.

The head of talent for a leading crypto VC estimates the total # of "true" CMO candidates in crypto at 10-15.

Already, your odds are not good:

Hundreds of projects looking to hire 10-15 people.
And if you're lucky enough to find a "true" CMO, their comp can easily be in the 7-figure range.

- $250K++ cash
- 50-100bps of equity at Series A/B

Read 16 tweets
Feb 16
I saw a headline that went unnoticed yesterday:

"White House confirms US has intelligence on Russian anti-satellite capability"

Here's what would happen if an adversary took out America's global positioning system:

(+ why you should have 30 days of supplies)
People are sleeping on the threat of anti-satellite weapons.

Even the White House downplayed the threat.

Spokesman John Kirby said it was "troubling," but claimed no immediate threat and that anti-satellite weapons couldn't cause physical destruction on Earth's surface.
So why then are anti-satellite weapons so "troubling?"

Because destroying GPS--a constellation of 31 satellites owned and operated by the US government--would send us back to the stone ages.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(