Delighted to speak at the @PoliceChiefs & @AssocPCCs Partnership Summit, which has focused on the police’s key priorities of cutting crime and building confidence.
Here’s a thread on the key points I covered: 1/6
I have asked @CollegeofPolice to consider options for a new non-degree entry route, to deliver officers of the highest calibre and ensure that forces are open to those who do not have a degree or want one. 2/6
My team and I at the @ukhomeoffice will look closely at ‘non-crime hate incidents’ to ensure that the police’s priorities are focused on tackling crime, not debating gender on Twitter. 3/6
I gave the police my full support to use all the powers at their disposal to deal with disruptive protesters, so that the rights of a selfish minority are not placed above the rights of the law-abiding majority. 4/6
I made clear that organisations and local leaders who have failed to protect our children from grooming gangs will be held to account. We will deport individuals who were involved in this criminality where the law allows it. 5/6
I am overseeing new guidance on data-sharing, and bringing together local examples of best practice, to drive up standards and efficiencies across policing. #commonsensepolicing 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The public rightly expects the highest standards of behaviour from police officers and the vast majority meet this expectation.
But recently too many high-profile incidents and reports, especially in London, have damaged trust.
This cannot continue.
1/4
It’s unfair on the public and lets down other serving officers.
Culture and standards in the police must improve.
And where an officer has fallen seriously short of these expectations, demonstrable, public action must be taken.
2/4
It’s absolutely vital that the police act to restore trust, return to #commonsensepolicing and treat the public and victims with the respect they deserve.
3/4
Thank you @Telegraph for correcting the record. No, I haven’t banned government lawyers from doing anything. Instead, I instigated the first major review of the quality of government legal advice. The conclusions were overwhelming: 1/5
government lawyers are too cautious in their advice and this has hampered ministerial policy objectives needlessly. Whilst the government wins the majority of its cases in court, there is a clear trend of lawyers advising negatively, only to be proven wrong in court. 2/5
Moving away from the ‘computer says no’ approach, I put in place new Legal Risk Guidance for government lawyers on how to support ministers better, adopt a solutions-based approach and use innovative legal thinking.3/5