Some numbers from India's #T20WorldCup campaign. To start, India arrived in Australia winning 26/35 T20Is after last year's WC smashing everyone in bilaterals. The brilliance of SKY, Hardik and their new ball bowlers masked their various other inefficiencies in this tournament.
India were the best team in batting Powerplay bw the two WCs with an average of 52 runs in the first six overs. This World Cup, they scored at 6.02 per over in Powerplay - only UAE scored at a lower rate than India in this phase.
India's top order were blown away on spicy tracks against quality bowling attacks of 🇵🇰 (31/3) and 🇿🇦 (33/2). In the other four games on better batting tracks they scored 32/1 v 🇳🇱, 37/1 v 🇧🇩, 46/1 v 🇿🇼 & 38/1 v 🇬🇧.
They preferred to survive rather than cash in as the scores suggest - in none of those four games they lost more than one wicket yet they never really took it to the opposition.
Rahul scored 68 off 76 balls (4 outs)
Rohit 72 off 76 (4 outs)
Kohli 50 off 51 (no dismissals)
Talking about bowling Powerplay, India were massively reliant on swing and Bhuvneshwar and Arshdeep turned up big time putting India in the ascendancy in four of the six games, failing to do so only in the two games at Adelaide Oval.
The problem was that India did not have Bumrah to sustain the pressure post PP or a wrist spinner to give breakthroughs in the middle overs. 🇵🇰 & 🇿🇦 rebuilt during this phase while England cashed in on the two finger spinners who found little help in Adelaide under lights.
Excluding the matches against 🇳🇱 & 🇿🇼, the two finger spinners had combined figures of 1/169 in 17 overs at an ER of 10 rpo. Axar bowled 6 overs in these 3 games and a better call would have been to play Hooda instead as second spinner with Hardik covering up with enough overs.
Hardik stood out with the ball in middle overs these games making crucial strikes against 🇵🇰 & 🇧🇩 while in the two games he failed, India ended up losing - vs 🇿🇦 and the semifinal.
Already without their best bowler, India further handicapped themselves benching their wicket taking leg spinner in conditions that called for wrist spin. The additional batting depth offered by Ashwin did not necessarily translate to better intent from their top order either.
India made several defensive selection calls, reverted back to their safety first batting approach despite a weakened bowling unit which were masked by individual brilliance or weak oppositions in the games they won but cost them against quality teams.
Against a team like England heavily skewed towards batting, India batted conservatively (100/3 in first 15 overs) and had no Plan B when the new ball didn't yield breakthroughs. A safety first batting approach has knocked out India in yet another T20 World Cup!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇮🇳 vs 🏴 semifinal tommorw offers loads of interesting battles, sub-plots and narratives and I'm particularly looking forward to the Powerplay battle bw England openers & India's new ball bowlers.
With Bumrah ruled out, India have been heavily reliant on early swing. Both Arshdeep and Bhuvi have been in brilliant form and India was the best side in Powerplay in Super 12 with the ball - 10 wickets at 17.10, ER 5.70. 32/2 v 🇵🇰 27/2 v 🇳🇱 24/3 v 🇿🇦 60/0 v 🇧🇩 28/3 v 🇿🇼
England like to get on with the things right from the start, given their batting depth. Hales has been the aggressor (SR 158) in PP letting Buttler to graft his innings (SR 108). It's likely to be the same way vs 🇮🇳 with Buttler's poor H2H vs Bhuvi (5 outs in 32 balls, 4 in PP).
Sunil Gavaskar was the greatest opening batsman against the deadly West Indies pace quartets of the late 1970s and 1980s.
MYTH BUSTER.
Thread.
Gavaskar scored more runs against WI than anyone else in Test cricket history - 2749 runs (Avg 65.45, 13 X 100s).
He opened in all but one innings scoring 2513 runs at the top of the order at 59.83, arguably the toughest slot to bat against an all firing pace attack.
Clive Lloyd, the mastermind behind the all pace strategy, was forced to adopt it following a 5-1 thrashing in Australia in 1975/76 in the hands of Lillee and Thomson. However, it was when India chased down 406 in PoS in 1976 Lloyd finally had enough of spinners.
Something about #ViratKohli innings yesterday. There were just eight dots out of the 50 he balls faced, six of which came in his first nine balls he faced. The last two came of his 24th [a leg bye] & 25th balls which meant each of his last 25 balls were scored off.
Among the 57 batsmen with 1000+ runs in T20Is, Kohli’s SR of 136.70 is only the 16th best. He hits a boundary only every 6.1 balls, which is ranked 30th in the list. However, only 53% of Kohli’s career runs have come in boundaries [4s+6s].
Of the 57 players with 1000+ T20I runs, only 14 players have a lower percentage of runs scored in boundaries than Kohli. And none of the 14 hits boundaries as frequently as him [6.1] – next best being Kane Williamson’s 6.7 balls per boundary.
[1/14] THREAD - India's defeat in the semifinal was a logical culmination of a sequence of events that the team management/selectors overlooked in the lead up to the tournament buildup last year or two.
[2/14] - Over-dependence on top three
India's top three contributed 63% of all runs scored by India since the last World Cup - more than any other side. To a large extent, Rohit-Kohli-Dhawan hid the fragilities of a wafer-thin middle & lower order.
[3/14] - Non-existent middle & lower order
In 34 successful run chases by India since Apr 2015, one from the top three top-scored in 30 of those. In four others, the top order set a reasonably strong platform for the middle & lower order to get them home.