Rafizi admitted in his press conference that Invoke as a group had lost money.
But he said one of its subsidiary is making money.
He then explained the big increase in net assets in Invoke that suddenly raised his personal net worth . . . .
. . . by saying that new investors had pumped in a big sum of money into Invoke by subscribing to new shares at a valuation of RM75million just this year - despite the company losing money and despite Rafizi's claim that the "profitable" invoke subsidiary . . . .
. . . is on course to make almost RM1million in profits this year.
RM75million is still a P/E ratio of 75 times of a potential RM1million profit.
This new investment is a big sum that is probably equivalent to RM15million to RM20million or about 15% to 20% of Invoke's shares.
He then justified that this RM75million is believable because a government agency, Cradle listed the valuation of Invoke at RM105million.
Now here's the catch. Valuations listed on Cradle are actually provided by the company itself.
Meaning it was Invoke who provided the RM105million valuation that Cradle then listed.
But Rafizi is also right when he said whatever sums and whatever valuation that an investor is willing to pay to take up shares in any company is willing buyer, willing seller.
Therefore, there is a loophole for a "investor" to channel funds to any company - including political funds.
They just have to agree on a super high valuation and then take up some new shares or buy existing shares from the owner to channel huge amount of funds to the target.
Let's look at some of the earlier investor of Invoke according to Crunchbase.
Invoke Partners Ltd (Taiwan) is the largest early stage investor.
But there is no such thing as Invoke Taiwan.
Invoke never partnered with anyone to open a Taiwan branch.
If you do a search for Taiwan on Invoke's website, there is zero result.
So who are these people? And why from Taiwan?
And then when you look at the directors of Invoke, a person by the name of Andrew Claster is listed.
Andrew is a senior member of USA President Obama's presidential campaign.
Obama is from the Democrats party.
They are hugely supported by George Soros, who is their main funder.
We also know Anwar and PH's long-standing links to the overt arm of the CIA, the NED.
Therefore in order for Rafizi to dispel any suspicions that his valuation is fake and that any new funding is not politically motivated, . . . .
Rafizi should :-
1) Reveal the identity of the new funders this year - including identity of the original funder called "Invoke Partners Ltd (Taiwan)".
2) Reveal the use of funds for the new big investment this year. Was any spent on political use?
3) Clarify his relationship, if any, with Soros and the NED.
thanks . . . .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nampaknya lidah rasmi PN, Agendadaily cuba memfitnah BN dgn memainkan isu kononnya Presiden UMNO, Zahid Hamidi mengakui akan membentuk jajaran politik baru bersama PKR dan DAP yang dikenali sebagai Perikatan 3.0
Sebenarnya kelemahan propaganda yg dibuat oleh Agendadaily ini terlalu bnyk sangat dan cukup mudah untuk dikesan penipuan tersebut. Apabila jajaran ini dikaitkan dengan kerjasama BN/PH, maka jelas ia adalah satu bentuk penipuan.
Meskipun Zahid Hamidi adalah presiden UMNO, namun keputusan parti dibuat melalui mesyuarat MKT ataupun sekurang-kurangnya melibatkan Top 5. Maka barulah keputusan itu akan diputuskan secara kolektif.
PH propaganda is that if BN win's GE15 then they will :-
- release Najib; and
- drop Zahid's corruption case?
Well . . . when PH won GE14, the first thing they did was to :-
- release Anwar; and
- dropped Guan Eng's corruption case; and
- dropped 16 other cases related to PH people; and
- pulled back the police report based on the RCI findings that Mahathir and Anwar was implicated in the RM33b (RM200b now) BNM forex scandal and classified the case as No Further Action (NFA); and
- appointed their own private lawyer as AG; and
- appointed own party member as MACC head; and
- broke the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2019 by interfering in the appointment of judges; and
- appointed own people as Elections Commission's head; and
When refusing Najib's lawyers request for an adjournment to prepare themselves, Maimun had stated that Najib's lawyer had breached rule 6(a) of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 that says :-
- An advocate and solicitor shall not accept any brief . . . .
. . . unless he is reasonably certain of being able to appear and represent the client on the required day.
However, Maimun conceded that this is just a rule of etiquette and not legally-binding.
But strangely, Maimun does not state that Nazlan could have breached the Judges Code of Conduct 2009 under the Federal Constitution that requires all judges to be free from any perceived or real bias - which would have required Nazlan to declare . . . .
AMLA is basically about movement of money that is deemed illegal.
How is that money illegal is based on a "primary offence".
For example in Naji SRC case, the RM42million (the AMLA charges) that Najib received in stages in late 2014 to middle of 2015 is deemed illegal . . . .
. . . because Najib participated or was involved in a cabinet meeting in year 2011 (the CBT charges) to give a RM2b government guarantee to SRC to borrow from KWAP.
(I wonder which person would wait 4 years after he had supposedly committed CBT to actually receive the money?
And then this thief never hide the loot but was in his own bank account and never steal the money for own use but used it for CSR.)
Without the primary offence being proven then the AMLA charges cannot stand since it cannot be proven that the money is illegal.
After re-reading the leaked MACC investigation papers on Judge Nazlan, I have finally figured out the reasons :-
- Both the prosecutors and Nazlan said in court that there was no need to prove that the funds that went into Najib's account was from KWAP;
- Why UMNO's statement to government to confirm if the leaked investigation papers are legit went unanswered and was ignored; and
- Why it suddenly becomes a big issue if Nazlan can be investigated by MACC and whether he can be charged by the AGC - a decision that . . . .
. . . the Federal Court under Maimun dare not decide yet.
The reason is:
- the MACC investigators following the detailed money flow found out the RM42million that went into Najib's account WAS NOT FROM KWAP but from Putrajaya Perdana Corporation (PPC);
You are free to try to transfer money to those accounts to test if his judgement that only the account holder (Najib) has control of incoming funds transferred from other account is correct or not.