I've been asked why the govt announcements of new austerity measures is so bad for private #forensic science providers /1
it should be obvious but I'll try and spell it out, here's the percentage change in external spend on forensic science by police forces 2011-2020, it's sort of a measure of volumes submitted to forensic science providers, [sort of - data provided police forces rarely clear] /2 Image
when cuts hit police forces, they do everything they can to protect their internal spend, they call it protecting the front line, but somehow we still have 43 forces, with 43 chief constables and 43 PCCs/mayors. They cut external spend to the bone, including £ to private FSPs /3
the last time austerity measures were introduced, the govt closed the forensic science service. Private FSPs were profitable and ready to invest mega £ into what they thought was a growing market with the removal of its biggest player, and yes they got a little bounce in profit/4 Image
Then austerity hit, police forces took huge chunks of cash out of the market, not only by going with the lowest possible tender pricing but also by reducing the volume of forensic submissions to the bare minimum, and sometimes not even that. /5
to the point where one FSP finally keeled over, it required emergency taxpayer funding to keep the machines on whilst current cases could be completed. It was to miracuosly survive /6
The govt only interevened when it looked likely that a second FSP was on the brink. They forced the police to allow prices for services to be raised to stabilise the market. Their concept of a stable market was one that didn't make a profit, but didn't cause a crisis either /7
Now, with new austerity measures to come, what do you think will happen? How do you think the police will react to cuts? There is no guarantee of volume of submissions in any of the forensic contracts, they are at the whim of each individual police force. /8
Compared to 2010, the private market is in no position to withstand austerity measures, it simply has nothing left. /9 /ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tiernan Coyle ☘️

Tiernan Coyle ☘️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeSuisTC

Mar 10
thread - Future state of #forensic science provision in england and wales, a tale of three reports /1
TLDR - after over a decade of disasterous forensic crises, police forces finally move from denial to acceptance on the change curve, waving the white flag, telling the government they're unable to manage forensic science nationally* and ask for help
*England and Wales - /2
House of Lords report publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ld… recommend a National Institute for Forensic Science and a Forensic Science Board both independent from policing /3
Read 33 tweets
Feb 1
I've had some time to read this now and am able to share my views on it, not sure how long this thread will be, I will unroll it at the end. Firstly an introduction to this document - what is it? It's a review requested by @PoliceChiefs into @TFProgramme and @FCNnetwork /1
@PoliceChiefs @TFProgramme @FCNnetwork AFAIK you won't find this document on the internet atm last time I visited @PoliceChiefs website it wasn't in their publication list. I'm very grateful to @PoliceChiefs for providing it to me via FOI, which they did speedily and without any quibble whatsoever. /2
@PoliceChiefs @TFProgramme @FCNnetwork I came across its existence via a very simple FOI request to PCCs asking them had they joined @FCNnetwork , Norfolk and Suffolk mentioned it in their response /3
Read 30 tweets
Oct 27, 2021
1/ Thanks to all who shared their views of @CharterForSci with me, I'm not a member so I really appreciate the frankness of the responses. I'm still going through them. Thread.
@CharterForSci 2/ I thought I'd share my views of the society as a non-member because with a new CEO imminent there is an opportunity for the soc to reappraise itself and its role. TLDR - it needs radical change to survive.
3/ I was a member of the society up to it becoming a professional body. I enjoyed the fun meetings, even presented at a couple and getting a copy of S&J. The professional route it took, wasn't for me.
Read 19 tweets
Jun 15, 2021
starting to work my way through #DanielMorgan report, will post as I go through but likely without comment at this stage. Remember some #forensic work dates back to 1987 and should be judged accordingly. /1
clothing and fibres #DanielMorgan /2
the shaded box represents comments from the panel in relation the #forensic work, they hired an independent expert to advise them. #DanielMorgan
Read 19 tweets
Apr 26, 2021
@LordsSTCom report 'Forensic science and the criminal justice system: a blueprint for change' debate starting at 3.35pm #LordsForSci
Lord Patel opening the debate #LordsForSci
scheduled for 3 hours yay #LordsForSci
Read 105 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(