Yesterday the CPUC released their updated proposal for the future of solar yesterday. The bottom line: it’s still drastic and will make it harder for everyday people to get solar. Here are some initial details… #SaveSolar#KeepSolarGrowing
Most consumers who get solar after April 2023 will see an average 75% reduction in the credit they receive for sharing their extra energy with the grid. This is the steepest decline we’ve ever seen in the United States. #SaveSolar
Churches, schools or businesses who go solar after April 2023 will see an even bigger reduction in the solar credit. #SaveSolar
Protections for existing solar users will remain in place with no changes (NEM1 or NEM2). The proposed changes will affect new solar users starting April 2023.
There is no overt solar tax in the CPUC's most recent proposal. However, the proposal would force new solar users to go onto an "electrification rate" that includes a $15/month charge.
When changes like these have been implemented elsewhere in the U.S, solar adoptions have dropped by a lot. That's what the utilities want, but it isn't good for the people.
Bottom line: The CPUC's newest proposal will still make it much harder for people who don't currently have solar to get it, including the people and community institutions that need it the most. This doesn't align with California's clean energy goals. It does align with PG&E's.
The CPUC is scheduled to make a final decision on December 15th. So the public has a little more than a month to weigh in.
Join our in-depth webinar where we unpack the details of the CPUC's proposal, the impact on consumers, and how you can take action: secure.everyaction.com/LS2NjeO020amIv…
Congress is close to making some important investments to help working people get rooftop solar & batteries. And @californiaPUC might undermine this gift by passing a #SolarTax and other changes that block working people from getting solar. #SaveSolar
This is crazy! And it's only happening because of the political power that @PGE4ME@SDGE@SCE have over the California state government. #SaveSolar
It's a fact: The @PGE4me supported Solar Tax of $300-$700/year + 80% cut to net metering that @californiaPUC is considering would destroy California's solar market even if Congress passes their plan. #SaveSolar
California needs more clean energy and we need it fast. In May CAISO — the state’s electricity grid operator — announced that California needs 1,500 to 2,000 more megawatts of electricity by 2026 to avoid more rolling blackouts. #SaveSolar
Today, California consumers install more than 20 MW of sun-charged batteries every month. That’s roughly the equivalent of a power plant every year. #SaveSolar
This is a good step, but the @californiapuc will undermine itself if they make it impossible for everyday people to reduce the burden on the grid with rooftop solar and batteries. #SaveSolar
Rooftop solar even w/out batteries significantly reduces the burden on the grid all the way to 6pm during the summer, well within the peak demand zone, as this chart from August 14, 2020 shows.
Rooftop solar with batteries can do even more to reduce stress on the grid, and accelerate the retirement of dirty, polluting peaker plants.
1/18 CBSMornings and @BRP1949, your story omitted some really important perspectives and data. Whether you intended to or not, the result is a one-sided story. #SaveSolar@GavinNewsom
2/18 Had @CBSMornings done even a little bit of research, you would have found that indeed, not only do solar users pay for the grid, but they actually make the grid cheaper for all ratepayers.
3/18 Solar users pay for the grid through the $10 minimum bill, plus an average of $50-$120 / mo for power when the sun's not shining, plus "nonbypassable charges" the utility deducts from the net metering credit.