my rule is that if theres anything very epic + old that should be kept in some type of archive (but isnt) i will obtain it. originally it was just a ‘christian material culture’ archive but then i expanded a little into history (mostly civil war stuff, because i kept finding it)
lets take a look at a few things before i get into work today
i literally just found these and you can also
i think this is 1840s
this was way more than my average price (35) but someone was staying at my house and bought it for me
no date but maybe 1850s ie pre-civil war polyglot bible
i think this is really cool
if anything is over 100 years old and christian and not really expensive ill just get it at this point
1870s, a book called ‘satan in society’
this one is kind of a personal flex if you know my interests
basically this is the christian science book, but its from the early 1900s so it was published when she (mary baker eddy) was still alive:
these are just the ‘archival’ books i keep on a separate shelf away from the normal books
basically the trick is, im just telling you guys because realistically if people like us dont find these theyll just sit there forever or get damaged or get thrown away:
you want to go to places where women are looking at furniture and old clothes, that just so happen to have some books. like, think - if someones grandparents die and they just take their stuff somewhere to sell, that kind of place. i usually dont go to specifically book places.
alright im supposed to be working but just a little PSA that people like us should be finding and archiving this stuff
this ones not that old (mid 1900s?) but its sick, check it out:
its great. do it. go rescue the books
i will say one unexpected thing is that reading them just feels really cool
i have a ~500 page book of some relatively niche state … information (biography) from 1870 and holding it and reading it all the way through just felt really epic. same with the others.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"therapy" is one of the most engaging topics. it clearly has a polarizing worldview surrounding it - we may look back and see "therapy culture" as the hallmark of this time.
but, something about it is obscure. what is this cloud around "therapy", exactly?
i have one idea.
...
one distinction that characterizes many fields over the last century, but has failed to trickle down to normal everyday people, is the difference between modernism and postmodernism.
although this sounds like the lead in to some academia, this distinction is essential.
to oversimplify: modernism is, basically, the first half of the 1900s. modernism as a project can be likened to building a big tower. we just got rid of all the "old worldview" stuff holding us back, and with our new tools, all our fields and knowledge are going to come together
american halloween theology: the philosophical mythology of insane clown posse
folk religion generally defies strict boundaries. it is, by definition, often fully enmeshed with aspects of a cultural landscape.
it is in this spirit that we briefly look at the insane clown posse.
the insane clown posse was originally known as the inner city posse, and made music far more aligned with the typical themes of rap and hip hop. based in detriot, they realized that pursuing this path would just lump them in with east and west coast artists, hindering them.
it is worth noting that detroit is, obviously, not a neutral place. in the american mind, detroit stands as a former manufacturing el dorado, which died, succumbing to various forces, and leaving a shell of itself behind. this may or may not be true, but thats part of its mythos.
saw this when i was 12 or 13 for some reason and it affected a huge portion of my life. a trojan horse: it appeals to people who have a crappy job and feel like they’re better than the customers, and then asks: if you’re so smart, why are you the one working there? brutal.
i had a ton of “lame jobs”. its something i enjoy, in a sense, for a time. if it was 1994 i probably could have been content just working the exact position documented in the film - a clerk. sadly they broke the social contract and put cameras into every workplace like this.
this ended the ability to do anything other than work, which was the whole point of having such a job.
thats really the point of the movie. both main characters feel like theyre better than the public, but only one uses his low station to his advantage: by freedom-maxxing.
oh yes. it is time for… our second annual children’s book recommendation thread.
the last one changed amazon’s suggested products list forever. such power we wield.
we take childhood reading very seriously here. allow me to send you some book ideas from the cyclops family hut.
the last recommendations thread was done around our first kid’s book release. that thread is below.
we have another kid’s book dropping before the holidays - presently, the main thing we are pumping is that i have all my books together as a package now. scope-able on my profile:
last intro note: premise. a normal person might describe my wife as a “crunchy mom”. her vibe is in the mix here. books clearly affect a kid’s spirit and psyche so we tend towards things we feel will nurture the brain-spirit in some way. basically, we are the bottom of this meme:
apathy about other people that you come into contact with is really a form of contempt. if you dont care what a person thinks, you obviously dont think very highly of them.
i have this. its the best and worst feature of my personality. recently, i tried to figure out why.
[…]
in some ways, its served me very well. it allowed me to get through basically anything as an artist. if you go down the “whole path”, inevitably you get some harsh critiques or insults. if you don’t care what other people think, you’re just immune. it doesn’t affect you - at all.
on the flip side, the slight contempt for normal people (you see this online here, “normies”) or others in general is caustic. its rarely articulated - you never say it or consciously think it, you may not even notice it, but it forms the subtext for your social interactions.
i’d like to discuss christian and mormon orientations toward knowledge.
for a variety of reasons, mormon theology has been a large topic on X recently. this is one of my main areas of interest, but its difficult to briefly hop into.
so, i really enjoyed reading perelandra:
perelandra is the second book in the space trilogy by c.s. lewis. obviously there will be some spoilers in here.
in the book, there’s a few characters that are obviously proxies: a woman is eve, one figure is the devil. the narrator is obviously, to me, a stand in for the author
ransom, the narrator, who i just read as lewis himself, finds himself in an analogy for the garden of eden. he is observing the devil slowly tempt eve, basically. he’s able to get involved and argue a little bit but, he has to sleep, the devil doesnt - he cant stop the process.