my rule is that if theres anything very epic + old that should be kept in some type of archive (but isnt) i will obtain it. originally it was just a ‘christian material culture’ archive but then i expanded a little into history (mostly civil war stuff, because i kept finding it)
lets take a look at a few things before i get into work today
i literally just found these and you can also
i think this is 1840s
this was way more than my average price (35) but someone was staying at my house and bought it for me
no date but maybe 1850s ie pre-civil war polyglot bible
i think this is really cool
if anything is over 100 years old and christian and not really expensive ill just get it at this point
1870s, a book called ‘satan in society’
this one is kind of a personal flex if you know my interests
basically this is the christian science book, but its from the early 1900s so it was published when she (mary baker eddy) was still alive:
these are just the ‘archival’ books i keep on a separate shelf away from the normal books
basically the trick is, im just telling you guys because realistically if people like us dont find these theyll just sit there forever or get damaged or get thrown away:
you want to go to places where women are looking at furniture and old clothes, that just so happen to have some books. like, think - if someones grandparents die and they just take their stuff somewhere to sell, that kind of place. i usually dont go to specifically book places.
alright im supposed to be working but just a little PSA that people like us should be finding and archiving this stuff
this ones not that old (mid 1900s?) but its sick, check it out:
its great. do it. go rescue the books
i will say one unexpected thing is that reading them just feels really cool
i have a ~500 page book of some relatively niche state … information (biography) from 1870 and holding it and reading it all the way through just felt really epic. same with the others.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
there are two groups of people that primarily have a problem with this (im generalizing, sorry if youre one of these two people and arent like this).
- very sexually attractive people
- highly credentialed sheltered academic style people
for those two groups of people (i cant add more designators but, do a little math urself) essentially everyone they meet or see IRL is kind of nice to them. either theyre really hot, and… thats a factor, or theyre essentially always in a situation where being mean is untenable.
THE TALE THUS FAR (recap): i moved out of my spot a few years ago to run a small theological and weird stuff art studio. its going well.
my first goal was: if you are on a certain part of the internet, you would see my stuff. i achieved that goal, i think. got it off the ground
it took me a while to get a grip on the controls. what im releasing, spending time on, how often - balancing all that with making $, balancing the deep stuff with the funny stuff, the aesthetics with the internet, seeing what the long term road would be
because the reformers still have some concept of a hierarchy and tradition and stuff like that. there was a third group who saw them as not going far enough that by virtue of being fringe was an enemy of both groups. they werent all united, its like a folder of weirdos. […]
i think whats partially annoying about a lot of intra-christian stuff online is people (correctly) realize relativism is false, but then incorrectly think they can prove everything about their metaphysics objectively, as tho its as simple as measuring a line + checking its length
the fact that there is one absolute truth doesnt necessarily correlate to it being provable in the same way that we can prove that water boils at 100 degrees celsius. but this is the way a lot of intra-christian dialogue is conducted, as though its that simple and empirical.
ultimately there is a distinction between empirical and spiritual knowledge. clearly i think spritual knowledge is real. however im often frustrated by how naïve it is to think you can just prove your metaphysics to someone and if they dont get it, something is wrong with them.
here's one of my favorite real life useful examples and practical demonstrations of a seemingly niche and abstract theological principle:
[intellect vs love] as seen in plotinus vs augustine when applied to: addiction
i.e. christianity vs neoplatonism in behavior modification
when i handle spiritual ideas, one of the angles i take on them is "okay, so, what does this mean in terms of: what you should do?"
whats the endpoint for this path and ideas in terms of: well, what do you do about it?
therefore i naturally reached this point with neoplatonism
neoplatonism (developing and implementing the ideas of plato over time, they wouldn't have called themselves this) has all the "plato stuff", if ur unfamiliar w it. theres this realm up there, ideal forms, here we are in the physical world, and there is some.. interplay, lets say