After ending two weeks on the BMT inpatient service, here is a 🧵 on my favorite BMT CTN trials that I teach to every new fellow/PA/NP/pharmacist/trainee on rounds.
I love these trials, and look forward to the ongoing ones!
I think that is enough for now- I do have another favorite- BMT CTN 1301 comparing methods of GVHD prevention- but that is a complex trial that deserves a thread of its own!
1. I will stop using restrictive neutropenic diets for patients who are undergoing transplant
as shown in this non-inferiority randomized trial. Patients are already going through a lot, lets not make it tougher for them by imposing dietary restrictions.
Just out in European Journal of Hematology, an in-depth patient level review of 456 deceased patients with myeloma, highlighting low palliative care involvement and⬆️transfusion usage, pain/anxiety, and hospitalizations at end of life.
Can't give enough credit to Geoff McInturf, Kimberly Younger, @Aspenbaby and Charles Walde- all med students/residents at @KUcancercenter for diligently combing through hundreds of patient charts for this.
This project is close to their hearts, especially as some members of this team have seen close relatives endure blood cancers. To be able to mentor them and guide them through a project they found so much meaning in was so special! Thank you again.
Heres a thread about cilta-cel, about the importance of intention-to-treat analysis, about ethics and access. It comes from a place of immense personal angst that I feel about the long waiting lists and the patients who die waiting to get this drug.
Cilta-cel is heralded by many as the greatest thing in myeloma, with Janssen (and many physicians) repeatedly telling us that there is a 98% response rate.
I want to start by saying this truly is a great drug and an amazing advance. I am thankful to the great scientists for this technology, and for the company for doing this trial, and the investigators. It is easy to write a tweet, but much tougher to do the actual work.
Ever wondered about the staging of myeloma? Why is it so confusing? Why are there three stages (as opposed to 4)? How many staging systems are there? What all contributes to risk? Heres a 🧵 that goes over the past, present and future of myeloma staging.
In the 1960s and 1970s, a number of clinical and laboratory parameters were identified that were independent predictors of survival such as hemoglobin calcium, serum creatinine, and severity of bone lesions.
Of note, these assessed disease "burden" rather than biology.
In 1975, a staging system was then proposed known as the Salmon-Durie system, which became widely-used!
The ATLAS trial presented at #ASCO22
-Given design (3 drugs maint, and PFS as endpoint), answer was obvious.
-Low power to detect any survival difference
-No quality of life presented, suspect would be worse if properly measured in KRd arm
-Please don’t adopt in practice! #mmsm
Other thoughts:
-induction suboptimal by US standards, suspect benefit would be even less if len was given. Remember- that len based consolidation helps if induction regimen did not contain len (emn02-h095), but does NOT help if induction regimen contains len (STAMINA trial)
Presenter described treatment as well tolerated. There was a treatment related death in KRd arm. After randomization, 5 patient in len arm withdrew due to “patient decision/other” but 16 withdrew in KRd arm.
That’s informative censoring.And likely because KRd was tough to handle
Theres a lot of talk about "top 5 or top 10" abstract lists at #asco2022 and a lot of hype.
In this 🧵, I highlight 5 flawed myeloma studies. I mean no offense to the well intentioned investigators, but do this to encourage critical inquiry and debate.
Those that were MRD positive paid the "MRD tax" in a big way- 36 months of coming to the infusion center twice a week.
With an endpoint of PFS and comparison of 3 vs 1, result guaranteed.
Wonder what QOL was in K arm?
2
Dara-RVD for smoldering.
SO PROBLEMATIC.
What does "MRD' negativity even mean in someone with smoldering myeloma? Why should the results of this trial matter any more than the dozens of other duplicative small trials? How can you cure some people who WERE NOT gonna progress?