JChoe Profile picture
Nov 13 9 tweets 6 min read
Here, I'll show you something fun about disinformation.

Organized disinfo - like we encounter in Russia's war on Ukraine - displays two formal features that define what it is: synchrony, and diversity.

Usually, that means they post the same memes.

Sometimes, they screw up. ImageImageImageImage
This is a Derek Utley-affiliated spam ring from 2019; I think they must have had someone new running things.

So instead of copy-and-pasting the same content, they shared it.

This gives you a glimpse of related accounts and pages - here, an apolitical page called "Memes". ImageImageImageImage
...and another page, called, imaginatively enough, "Memes 2".

This is, I want to stress, unusual, because instead of copy-and-pasting the image - so that they all (diversity) end up mysteriously saying the same thing at the same time (synchrony) - they just straight shared it. ImageImageImageImage
Again, I have receipts to show what that looks like.

This is from Kavanaugh's nomination in '18; notice more "diversity" in the posters.

This was all posted within a day, after a week of nearly silence on the Kavanaugh nomination in junk-news world. ImageImageImageImage
It's a kind of inverse of a natural-language processing concept, "term frequency/inverse document frequency", or tf/idf.

It's like, if one document in my collections says "splarg" a lot and it's the only one, if someone asks me, that's probably the splarg document.
Here, it's document frequency/historical term frequency

It's like if fifty people all say suddenly "NAFO are alien doggies from Jupiter" and literally f**k-all in the way of people saying that existed previously... that tells us something.

That's probably shenanigans.
The interesting thing here is that, as with diagnosing Gricean maxim breaks as a structural feature of disinfo, you don't need to fact-check it to discern that it's a lie.

In other words, just looking at HOW people lie can tell us WHEN they are lying.

Contemporaneous Facebook post with anomalous Derek Utley ring behavior:
facebook.com/choejoohn/post…

Contemporaneous Facebook post from Sept 28 2018 with screenshots of organized Kavanaugh disinfo:
facebook.com/choejoohn/post…

Gricean maxims and #ParmesanGirl:


:)
In plain-talk:

If no one says "splarg" and one guy says "splarg" a lot, that's the "splarg" guy (tf/idf).

And if 50 known liars all say the same damn thing at the same damn time, it's probably a lie, you don't need a fact-checker to figure that one out.

Lies have structure.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JChoe

JChoe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoohnChoe

Nov 15
You've gotta be wary of frequency bias, but:

Is anyone else seeing "#Russophobe" used to slur high-profile members of #NAFO who make jokes about it?

So, OK: few things about that.

Start with the context for "#russophobia" as a joke and a dogwhistle.
angdraug.medium.com/russophobe-is-…

🧵 Image
As some of the old hands in #NAFO are doubtlessly aware, "russophobia" is a recurrent disinfo theme, and this isn't the first time it's cropped up in the context of Ukraine.

So, here's @DFRLab (<-- follow them, we like them) talking about it in '18

medium.com/dfrlab/putinat… Image
Back in 2017, Brian Whitmore in RFE/RL traces Russophobia back to "19th-century Slavophile poet and diplomat Fyodor Tyutchev", and reinforces an exceptionalist, righteously-aggrieved victim narrative for Russia.

rferl.org/a/the-russopho…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 14
This dude from Ukraine made a 2,710 meter shot.

Assume a McMillan TAC-50, zeroed at 100m, shooting a 660 grain M1022 projectile with a ballistic coefficient of 0.65 at 2,700 meters per second.

That's 4.2 mils up, or 42 clicks up (hah).

At 35x it's off the bottom of the scope😂 ImageImageImage
*assuming a Nightforce ATACR 7-35x56mm scope with 0.1 mRad clicks

Crazy numbers, those are crazy
hey do you have a ballistic calc handy for a fact check @LivFaustDieJung?
Read 4 tweets
Nov 7
If you think about it, a leaderless movement of activists resisting disinformation around a war is a kind of "anti-weapon".

"True" anti-war activism the way I mean it - getting, not just talking about, outcomes like sanctions & war crimes prosecutions - doesn't fit elsewhere.
First, nuclear weapons gave the U.S. a counter-advantage against the numerically superiority of the Warsaw Pact.

This was the first offset.

"Small wars" (in the Marines' sense), COIN and asymmetric conventional conflicts led to the second offset: precision munitions.
The third offset, though this is still a somewhat novel term to some people, I think (or at least an unfashionable one) is developing American technology superiority and innovation capabilities.

This is one way we're planning to address "near-peer" adversaries, basically.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6
Let me show you an activist trick from the resistance years.

Interview ~150 people about a political candidate and ask them to use two, three words at the most to describe them.

Personality psychologists found that most words about people boil down to 5 dimensions -

1/4
- so in principle, every word you're hearing should cluster together with similar words.

Take those clusters together, and simplify them even further, until you have three to five (seven at most) words you use to describe someone.

The result is a consensus message.

2/4
When you take those boiled-down terms and then put them back into memes, the folks who responded to the poll are already "invested" and will spread your memes, because you listened to them and cared what they said.

This is the relationship you want.

3/4
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6
She burned her rep by publicly backstabbing a fellow Berner.

And for what?

For a frankly piddling amount of fame: she was ~50th place for 'trending' on Twitter, because she tried to attack NAFO as racists, and we accidentally called her 'Brie' (like Brie Larson & Alison Brie).
Here, I'll tell you a story about rep:

I've linked this NYT article before, but this is the spot where my company is mentioned and linked.

For the next two months after this came out, I turned down Washington Post & New York Times interview requests.
nytimes.com/2019/01/07/us/…
In January of 2019, when that story came out, I could have gone public with, essentially, a lot of details on how political operations on the center-left are financed.

I mean names, companies, meetings, phone logs; basically the kind of thing that Breitbart or Fox would use.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 6
Saint Olga of Kyiv was a Varangian queen whose husband was killed by Drevlians whose diplomats proposed a marriage.

Olga agreed then buried the diplomats in a ditch.

Then she burned more in a bathhouse.

Then she went to the capitol and killed 5,000 more at a feast.

Yup. Olga.
The lesson here is, don't f**k with Ukrainian women named Olga

...actually wait I don't think the name has anything to do with it 🤔
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(