David Rothkopf Profile picture
Nov 13 19 tweets 5 min read
In '20, @JoeBiden was second guessed by many (me included). He wasn't exciting. Too old school. Talked about healing. Talked about a clear agenda when the other side had little to offer but hate & good TV ratings. And he won decisively despite the skepticism of the "smart money."
For two years, he was derided for reaching out to the other side, for his compromises with the left or with the centrists in his own party, for not be exciting enough. He ignored the Beltway buzz. He did the dullest thing imaginable: he governed.
The American Rescue Plan lifted millions out of poverty and helped stimulate a job boom that now has produced 10 million jobs, a record, more than the last three GOP administrations added up. Record number of quality judges were appointed. Executive orders undid Trump's damage.
He made the bold decision to end America's longest war. He passed the largest piece of infrastructure legislation in half a century. He helped tame a pandemic. Critics, even within his own party said, "Don't do too much, don't spend too much, the bond markets won't like it."
But the jobs kept being created. When Putin challenged the decency and the West in Ukraine, Biden led and has been central to NATO and global support for Kyiv that has produced extraordinary results and made all safer. It was all part of restoring American standing worldwide.
He and a disciplined Democratic Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act that also was the biggest piece of environmental legislation in US history. He took steps to reduce healthcare costs for Americans even when zero Republicans supported it.
In fact, with few exceptions, the Democrats passed a rich agenda, that also included the important Chips and Science Act that will help the country compete and create more and better jobs in the future, in the face of constant GOP obstruction.
Still, the savants and pundits said, the Democrats would be crushed in the 2022 elections. The GOP had momentum. Inflation would do Dems in--even though it was a global phenomenon and the GOP was closely linked to its causes from Putin to corporate profiteering.
There would be a Red Wave. Biden was too busy focusing on democracy and protecting the fundamental rights of women and voters when, the GOP talking heads and the bogus polls said what was front and center was inflation and only that and the Dems were doomed.
But Biden stayed laser focused. He said his first act in the new Congress would be to guarantee a woman's reproductive freedom. He made moving, heartfelt speeches about why it is essential to reject the lies, the election deniers, the coup plotters.
The result was the best result for a new president in a midterm election in sixty years, maybe longer. The Democrats held the Senate. It is still unclear how many seats they will lose in the House. But it won't be what was predicted.
In fact, it is still possible that the Ds could hold the House, still possible the Dem margin in the Senate could be better than it was. Election deniers running for top posts were rejected. Legislatures were flipped. The Republican leadership is turning on itself.
And Biden's first comments after the election were about the work to come, the governing ahead. Joe's too old. Joe's too boring. Joe's too quick to compromise. Joe's too stubborn. Joe's out of touch. Joe's...just off to the best start of any POTUS in more than half a century.
Left in his wake, defeated by his experience and his wisdom and his determination and his truly exceptional world class team, are the media favorites, the highly rated pundits, the best-selling columnists, the know-it-alls, the fancy insiders.
I could write the same thing about @SpeakerPelosi or @SenSchumer, co-authors of this remarkable record. You could say it about so many members of the united, mobilized Democratic team that this time around weathered the GOP efforts at suppression, ignored their lies & showed up.
You could sat it about the Gen Z voters and the women and people of color who saw the threat and made the effort to fight for democracy. You could say it about all of you who have participated in the wholesale rejection of the greatest threat to our system we've seen since WWII.
Common sense is not exciting. But what we just saw was a victory for common sense. Decency doesn't drive clicks. But what you just saw was a victory for decency. Governing is tedious, incremental, arcane. But what you have seen for two years are the benefits of governing.
The conventional wisdom has been wrong about @POTUS @VP @SpeakerPelosi @SenSchumer @WHCOS, the president's cabinet, @TheDemocrats and their team from day one. Maybe we will learn. Probably we won't. But we can be grateful that they will ignore all that.
We can be grateful that at a perilous moment in US history, they will focus on the work that needs to be done, on the threats we face at home and abroad, and on what matters. And if the past is any indication, they will continue to succeed...against the odds, on behalf of us all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Nov 5
I will admit to (characteristic) confusion on how to handle developments at Twitter. At first I was, "I'm outta here" if Elon buys. But after talking to some of you and my colleagues, I was persuaded to wait and see. So, I'm waiting and seeing. That said...
It seems clear Elon is screwing this place up big time. The way he treated the Twitter team, his apparent disregard for the value of moderation, his complete misunderstanding of the value of verification and his continuing odiousness all suggest an app circling the drain.
Now, this $8 monthly fee also sets off alarms. The idea that verification is now meaningless means the site is less valuable as a source of information. The idea that the algorithm will prioritize people who pay is also disturbing and actually has a de-democratizing effect.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 4
The GOP has been trying to change the subject re: the campaign all year. They don't want it to be about Roe. They don't want it to be about the threat to democracy. They don't want it to be about their plan to end Social Security & Medicare. They don't want it to be about Trump.
They don't want it to be about the fact they voted against every Dem plan to help people cope with rising prices. They don't want it to be about their votes against the Biden-Dem initiatives that have lifted millions out of poverty and created millions of jobs.
You can hardly blame them about wanting to change the subject. Their record is terrible. So they lie. And they embrace racism, anti-semitism and hate. And they have had plenty of help from many in the media who have bought into their distractions, deflections and dissembling.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 28
I'm doing one of those embarrassing public about-faces that are usually associated with the Conservative party in the UK and US football analysts predicting this is the week Tom Brady and the Bucs will finally turn things around.
Despite my unbridled loathing for Elon Musk and my deep concern for what his take-over of Twitter may mean not just for Twitter but for public discourse and politics and the US and elsewhere, I've decided to remain on the platform for now.
Why? A few reasons:
1.) We're at a very dangerous moment in U.S. politics and it is important to use all the platforms available to counter the message and offer an alternative to the racist, sexist, irresponsible, anti-democratic MAGA GOP.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 26
The coverage of the Fetterman-Oz debate revealed so much that is wrong with our media & our politics. Much of today's media coverage, including headlines in both the @NYTimes and @WashingtonPost, focused on the temporary and superficial consequences of Fetterman's stroke.
Is it worthy of comment? Of course. Was it or should it have been the primary take-away from the debate? Not even close. It reflected a view of debates as being much like what was described by Oz, as "television shows." It ignored that they have a more serious purpose.
Fetterman stumbled and searched for words. But what he said should have been more important than how he said it. He exhibited clear thoughts and, perhaps more strikingly when considering his opponent, clear conscience and good values.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 25
It is hard to argue with this statement. Of course, what is not said is that "free and independent" is not sufficient for the people of Ukraine. They want it to be a whole Ukraine, the Ukraine that existed before the Russian invasion in 2014.
Further, it must not be a temporarily free & independent Ukraine. It must be an enduringly free & independent Ukraine. That means Russia must not only renounce all claims but, because they violate every deal they make, Russia must be effectively deterred from future attack.
That means Ukraine must have the weapons it needs to defend itself and the international relationships that will help it do so as well. Ukraine may also seek justice for the victims of Russian war crimes and reparations for Russian damage.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 23
Stability has always been paramount in China. Xi however, is making the same error as Mao (& autocrats worldwide.) He's mistaking the consolidation of power for a stabilizing force. China deeply needs reforms, better governance, solutions for economic problem & brewing divisions.
He has failed at delivering those in his prior terms in office. Developing a cult of personality, purging the leadership of dissenting voices, asserting a Chinese global role before it has addressed the fractures and gaps in its own foundations, turning the clock back won't work.
China is strong today because its leadership over the past 40 yrs recognized it must adapt & change to grow and flourish. It has done exceptionally well when it innovated and was open to new ideas. Repression and strong men have always weakened it (as they weaken all countries.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(