Quite the report from @BloombergUK... the more that one reads and hears about these new chip controls and how the Biden admin has run this, the more it looks like a dog's breakfast.
'Japan and the Netherlands were ready to formalize multilateral controls (for) 5-nanometer chips... but the US then wanted to raise that threshold to more mature technologies that would lead to a bigger impact on chip companies’ China sales. That’s when talks collapsed.'
'They were promised the govt wouldn’t move ahead with the controls before having allies onboard. However.. officials failed to convince partners or inform the chip firms of their plans to implement the measures in Oct. Just days before.. they were no longer picking up calls..'
'For the China hawks within the Biden admin, early Oct was seen as the only window they had to unveil new restrictions before it got too close to the meeting between Biden and Xi at the G-20 summit'
Failing to get allies or your own firms on board isn’t good for leverage either..
Initial readouts suggest that cramming these new controls in before the Biden-Xi meeting didn't move the dial with the Chinese side at all.
Which, if you've been following the direction of Chinese cyberspace policy under Xi, is hardly surprising. scmp.com/news/china/dip…@SCMPNews
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wonder how many of those giving hot takes that the 'world' is united in response to Russia are watching how the debate is playing out beyond the US/EU media space...
The UNGA vote later today will be a bellwether. But look to how countries respond to the weaponising of SWIFT.
Sure enough...
'willingness of the emerging market giants to sustain business relations with Russia highlights a deep rift over Europe's biggest crisis since the World War II, and threatens to chip away the dominance of the U.S. dollar in global trade. ' reuters.com/business/after…
'Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Turkey – have thus far declined to implement any sanctions measures against Russia. Neither have... Israel and most former Soviet states outside of Europe.' lawfareblog.com/what-sanctions…@lawfareblog
'...Rares first threw out their defence.. concerned about “sweeping and imprecise particulars”, “hearsay”, “speculation” and “circular inferential reasoning”.. Some parts.. were “embarrassing because they were conclusory and had no content of substance”'
'In August 2019, a full bench of the Federal Court unanimously rejected an appeal against Rares’ ruling. ... the particulars of the truth defence drawn up by the ABC and Nine had “many problems” including “vague allegations”, “vague words” and was “untenable”.'