Next week, at the #ISSDP2022 conference, I will present the first paper in preparation for my book with @policypress on ‘Drug Policy Constellations’. It examines the role of morality in influencing UK drug policy. kar.kent.ac.uk/97946/ Here’s a summary. 1/11
TL:DR. The contents of drug policy decisions are influenced by the different moralities which bring people together in constellations of policy actors and policy positions. 2/11
The paper uses the policy constellations approach, which I created with @GFZampini in our earlier article on UK drug policy. It explains that networks bring not just people but power and moral ideas together in overlapping constellations. linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S… 3/11
Using auto-ethnography, plus critical realist discourse analysis of policy documents and elite interview transcripts, I identified five ethico-political bases of UK drug policy. #criticalrealism 4/11
I then mapped the UK drug policy field, using two-mode social network analysis. This uses the connections between policy actors and the policy positions they hold to map them into connected clusters. #SNA 5/11
[This is one of my first forays into #SNA, so I’d be particularly interested in feedback on this aspect of the paper.] 6/11
The distribution of actors and positions across the sociogram maps onto the four ethico-political bases of traditionalism, paternalism, progressive social justice, and liberty. Compassion is a shared value across the policy field. 7/11
Using the modularity statistic in @Gephi, I identified three macro constellations in UK drug policy. The most powerful policy actors cluster together in the hybrid medico-penal constellation, in which paternalism overlaps with the use of drug policy for social control. 8/11
The UK drug policy reform movement can be grouped into three, overlapping micro constellations which focus on: racial justice; progressive reform; and individual and commercial freedom. 9/11
The ethico-political bases I have identified explain the shape of the UK drug policy field better than do party political affiliations. Labour (red) and Conservative (blue) policy actors can be found across the drug policy spectrum. 10/11
These ethico-political bases, I argue, help us understand the role of morality in UK drug policy, and why it takes the forms it does. You can download the paper (pdf) and the presentation (ppt). kar.kent.ac.uk/97946/ Comments and questions are very welcome. 11/11
If you're interested in the role of morality in drug policy (and, indeed, any aspect of drug policy), I highly recommend this brilliant book by @AlisonRitter1taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.…
A thread on studies by some US economists of the ‘moral hazard’ of harm reduction practices: i.e. the idea that harm reduction increases overall drug use and related harms by reducing the costs and harms of use to the individual, rational decision-maker. 1/7
Thread: I've just been counting the number of bad ideas in @thetimes report on the new #drugstrategy2021 (text taken from @LexisNexis). Let's start with the premise that (1) there is an 'alarming rise' in drug offences, and (2) half of all murders drug-related...
The reason for (1) the increase in drug offences is that the police have been carrying out more stop-and-searches. We don't know what the underlying trend in drug use is, although there are worrying reports of increased drug-related deaths.
The idea (2) that half of all murders are drug-related is based on data suggesting that either the victim or the perpetrator used controlled drugs. By that logic, 100% of murders are water-related.
The #SewellReport really is a verbose, sloppy and intellectually dishonest piece of work. In the bits I know about (drugs and crime), there is a pattern of misleading readers by mischaracterising the sources it cites. Here are some examples. 1/n
To back a claim that cannabis is a 'gateway' drug, it cites a 2002 ACMD report. Here's what a later (2008) ACMD report says on the issue
To support the idea that stop and search works, they rely on a study in the BJC . While this study found a small association with lower recorded drug crime, it conclude, 'claims that this is an effective way to control and deter offending seem misplaced'. academic.oup.com/bjc/article/58…
If not by institutional racism, then how can the commission explain ongoing disadvantage in the criminal justice system, employment, housing, school exclusions?
The report apparently states “We found that most of the disparities we examined, which some attribute to racial discrimination, often do not have their origins in racism.” Which is pretty close to MacPherson's definition of *institutional* racism.
The commission tries to minimise the existence of institutional racism by re-defining it. Note that Macpherson's definition included 'unwitting prejudice, thoughtlessness, ignorance'. Their new definition is more about direct discrimination.
I have resigned from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Recent political vetting and
exclusion of suitably qualified applicants to join means that the ACMD is losing its independence. A thread to explain follows…
After the unjustified dismissal of @ProfDavidNutt in 2009, several ACMD members resigned. A
working protocol was put in place to protect the independence of the ACMD from ministerial
interference. gov.uk/government/pub…
The independence of the ACMD was a big factor in my deciding to apply to join in 2014. Please note that members of the ACMD are not paid by the government for their work – it is done in members’ own time, or in time paid for by their employer (for me, it was a mixture of both)